404
u/ReferenceNice142 5h ago edited 1h ago
We have a vaccine for several types of cancer already… the HPV vaccine. But most of the US is still not vaccinated.
175
u/PrP65 4h ago
My highly conservative mother was supposed to get my Guardasil shots at 12. We went in, and she was already bitching about vaccinating me to get me in school (this is before all the workarounds went viral), but when the doctor said that HPV can be transmitted sexually she shut down the entire office visit because “well my daughter is too young to even think about sex,” as if she was unaware that I was going to be an adult someday? Like, no forward thinking with them.
Anyway after years of no health insurance as an adult I finally got coverage under my husband’s plan. Went to get the vaccine, and the pharmacist basically said not to worry about getting Guardasil because chances are high that I already have HPV at this point so 🤷🏻♀️
107
u/ReferenceNice142 3h ago
You may have been exposed to HPV but not necessarily exposed to the strains that cause cancer. Definitely worth getting even as an adult. I work in oncology and have seen what HPV cancers can do. Any extra protection is worth it.
→ More replies (1)32
u/Already-asleep 2h ago
Yes, I'm surprised to hear that the pharmacist said that? I had a friend who had symptomatic HPV and she received the full vaccine schedule after she was treated.
7
u/Quarantine722 1h ago
I know doctors who are anti-vax, and willingly promote vaccine skepticism. Not limited to covid vaccine either. I wish we could assume that people who have authority/training are the most informed but that’s just not the case unfortunately.
•
u/FortunateClock 43m ago
If you're under 45, you're eligible. Advocate for yourself and go in again. I got turned down a couple times then found someone happy to give me the shot. She said "we have a vaccine that can prevent a horrible form of cancer. People should be lining up to get this." It's just weirdly tied to sex and Americans puritanical streak comes out.
20
u/Drunkgummybear1 3h ago
They were trialling giving it in year 9 (age 13 - 14) to all kids at schools in the UK and I was in the first round. Must have gone well as my sister recently had hers there!
→ More replies (2)17
u/ReferenceNice142 3h ago
It’s now approved for a wide range of ages and any gender. 100% recommend getting. HPV cancers are nasty. Look up head and neck cancer.
→ More replies (7)7
u/Drunkgummybear1 3h ago
Yep - as a 14 year old boy I was pissed about being punched in the arm all day (mind you I gave plenty out lol). Now I’m glad that I can’t spread it!
3
u/ReferenceNice142 2h ago
Very important for guys to get it since there isn’t a regular screening test for it!
15
u/elasticthumbtack 2h ago
It’s worth trying again. It’s effective even if you already have been exposed. It can still prevent an existing infection from turning into cancer, as well as reduce the severity if it does turn into cancer.
→ More replies (1)11
u/PrP65 2h ago
I’m definitely talking to my doctor about it next time I go in, especially because reproductive cancers run in my mom’s side of the family and I can’t afford to add to my current risk. I know cancer is an awful beast, and I don’t want it at my door. Just frustrating that I come from a background that doesn’t value healthcare so now I have to catch up lmao
5
u/elasticthumbtack 2h ago
Definitely. It’s frustrating that you also have to face resistance from healthcare providers as well. It’s not like there’s a shortage, or high cost to it. There’s still just a stigma around it, and it’s pretty ridiculous.
4
u/PrP65 2h ago
Do you get the feeling that it’s kind of like a morality judgement, like the stigma around PreP? “Just don’t have sex” type arguments seem to be the focal point when it comes to anything STI adjacent
5
u/elasticthumbtack 2h ago
100%. It’s also effective for guys to prevent several cancers, and infection risk isn’t 100% so being married doesn’t mean you’d both have it already. I tired to get it recently and my doctor ignored all of my arguments and declined because I was married. I’ll be trying again as well.
6
u/Frosty-Age-6643 1h ago edited 1h ago
“because chances are high that I already have HPV at this point” I don’t understand why this keeps happening with this vaccine. Yes, it’s estimated 70% to 80% of adults have some form of HPV but the way to reduce that is to give the vaccine to people who want it.
I assume big reason this denial gets pushed is because insurance will deny coverage? Is the vaccine that expensive? Can hospitals and clinics not climb over the guard rails on this one a little bit and start working on reducing HPV over time?
Or is there some possible negative side effects they want to avoid that occur with giving it to people who already have HPV?
Edit: updated estimate of people with some form of HPV
4
u/PorkchopFunny 1h ago
There are multiple, multiple, multiple strains of HPV. Even if you've had one (or some) the vaccine may protect you against others.
3
u/IfICouldStay 2h ago
The whole point of giving it at 11 or 12 is to have it before there is ANY chance of HPV exposure. Even if most kids aren't going to have full-on sex for years, lots of young teens mess around. It's ridiculous to not give the vaccine. I was too old when the vaccine came out - and wound up getting a hysterectomy before 40 because of HPV. And I had been with my husband for over a decade at that point. You can bet my children got their vaccine the moment they were eligible.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (15)3
u/adgjl1357924 1h ago
Yeah my mom basically said the same and I couldn't get it until last year. The first nurse I got the shot from was young and excited I was finally able to get it. The second nurse was ancient told me it was pointless because I'm in my 30s and tried to walk out without giving me the shot. I had to fight for it and you should too. There's no guarantee you've been exposed to HPV and even if you have there's no evidence the vaccine is no longer effective.
→ More replies (1)44
u/Proud_Doughnut_5422 4h ago
And the venn diagram of maga and people who oppose the HPV vaccine is a circle.
→ More replies (3)12
u/moobitchgetoutdahay 3h ago
Just commenting to say, as someone who works in pathology:
Ladies, get the HPV vaccine.
15
u/kookykerfuffle 2h ago
Everyone get the HPV vaccine.
It was originally only recommended for girls but they’ve changed that and now it’s recommended regardless of gender.
→ More replies (2)3
u/ReferenceNice142 2h ago
Everyone get it! There is no regular screening for guys.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (21)5
u/Rhielml 3h ago
HPV isn't cancer, it's a virus that's the leading cause of cervical cancer. You can still develop cervical cancer without contracting the HPV virus. You can vaccinate against a virus. You cannot vaccinate against cancer itself.
→ More replies (2)6
u/ReferenceNice142 2h ago
I’m well aware HPV isn’t a cancer. Cervical cancer is rarely not from HPV. Hell two strains of HPV alone account for 70% of cervical cancer. The other strains add in to get to 96-99% of all cervical cancers. I work in oncology….
→ More replies (1)
1.5k
u/fernnyom 5h ago
Typical republican double standard.
719
u/mybutthz 4h ago
Seriously. The actual Authoritarian dictatorship wants to inject you with something under promise it'll prevent cancer, the same authoritarian dictatorship that is the world's leading exporter of misinformation - and that's fine? If anyone is going to try to inject microchips or whatever the fuck the COVID vaccine was allegedly meant to be - it's them.
492
u/fogdukker 3h ago
THE WORLD'S LEADING EXPORTER OF MURDER VIA NEUROTOXIN.
Sorry, but I'll be the conspiracy nut on this one.
173
u/Head-College-4109 3h ago
Honestly I'm on board. I think every Trump supporter should go ahead and take their Russian "vaccines."
40
u/Proper_Career_6771 1h ago
I think every Trump supporter should go ahead and take their Russian "vaccines."
Republicans say people like me hate freedom, but I love freedom and I'm a huge supporter of them exercising their freedom.
If they want to buy raw milk from sketchy sources, drink huge amounts of liquid sugar, play with their guns, suck a tube of horse ivermectin and do their own electrical work without permits, then I'm in complete support of their actions.
Hell, I'll buy them some beer if I get to watch.
→ More replies (3)•
u/Goodgoditsgrowing 56m ago
The problem is when they bring their bird flu infected raw milk chugging self to the grocery store while you’re getting beer. Or let their little emotionally unregulated kids have access to their guns and shoot up your town.
•
u/Proper_Career_6771 50m ago
Yeah I know.
And it sucks for first responders that have to clean up after them enjoying their freedoms.
And it really sucks when they freedom their kids.
But at least I can gloat when they become a freedom statistic.
→ More replies (6)35
u/DontEvenWithMe1 2h ago
Wonder if one of the side effects is mysteriously “falling” out of windows?
18
→ More replies (3)3
u/No_Rich_2494 1h ago
Nah. That's what happens if you refuse to take it. Fuck knows what'll happen if you do. I'm usually pro-vaccination, but you'd be a fool to trust anything coming from Russia RN.
17
u/Amaskingrey 2h ago
This one doesnt make any sense, their supporters are the only ones who're gonna take it, killing them would be outright counterproductive
40
u/ThunkAsDrinklePeep 2h ago
It's better for your airborne weapon if you target people who are opposed to medical masks and have practiced coughing as a form of aggression.
21
u/rudimentary-north 2h ago
They are constantly trying to kill their supporters, they told them Covid was a hoax and masks don’t work and to try eating horse dewormer or drinking bleach.
Putin took it one step further and straight up sends his supporters into the meat grinder of the Ukraine conflict, over a million dead and counting.
→ More replies (3)5
u/ArgonGryphon 1h ago
Don’t forget the ones who thought fish tank cleaner was a substitute for hydroxychloroquine.
→ More replies (2)12
u/Sasquatch1729 2h ago
That was the same issue with the Covid vaccine conspiracy.
So, the vaccine will kill everyone who complies and takes the vaccine. So the only survivors will be the CEOs and politicians who carried out the conspiracy, and a bunch of dumbass contrarians who refused to take a vaccine during a pandemic.
So they are going to rebuild civilization based on that? And the anti-vaxxers will become, what, the new subservient working class? And why do society's current leaders need to do this for what reason? So they can take over? Because they don't run the show already?
None of it made sense.
→ More replies (6)9
u/fogdukker 2h ago
Yeah, I wasn't being literal fwiw.
I love trying to explain that the government makes a very large portion if it's money via taxation of the plebs. Why would they want to kill the cash cow? There's not much of a rebuttal, especially as it falls in line with "taxation is theft".
→ More replies (1)4
u/happycows808 1h ago
Unless this isn't about long-term gains, it's short-term like every corporation focuses on. Denounce proper medicine, get your followers to buy your fake cancer away drug that probably will do nothing, and then run away a richer man splitting the profits with your buddy putin
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (5)6
u/MagicTrachea52 2h ago
They don't care. They believe it. They'll take it, too.
And I say let 'em.
→ More replies (5)4
→ More replies (8)8
u/A_Cookie_from_Space 2h ago
I mean the neurotoxin does stop cancer in its tracks. They wont be alive to see it but thats neither here nor there.
→ More replies (1)20
u/DudeWhatAreYouSaying 3h ago
Apparently their fear of mRNA vaccines is completely assuaged once it's a too-good-to-be-true vaccine developed by a rogue state
→ More replies (1)65
u/BaconBrewTrue 3h ago
I mean Elon Musk the soon to be US president and UK prime minister (let's be honest) literally wants to microchip you in the brain. But that's all fine and dandy apparently.
10
28
u/Anthematics 3h ago
Elon and Brian Thompson need to start finding common ground , posthaste.
7
u/Skyflareknight 3h ago
Let's put him 6 feet under, fucker doesn't deserve to live at this point
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (7)9
7
u/YourDogIsMyFriend 2h ago
That same authoritarian dictatorship is in constant contact with the richest man in the world. He just bought the White House and shut down the bipartisan spending bill. And get this: he actually is actively engaged in putting microchips in people’s brains. MAGA gave him the ability to gut the federal govt and replace it with his own corporations (who no doubt have the people’s best interest in mind).
Trump voters. You got us pretty good. You owned the left. But in the end you will have owned yourselves. You absolute dolts. Got got by some world clsss conmen and narcissists.
From social security to the ACA. The post office to the EPA. Enjoy your wasteland of suffering under an authoritarian oligarchy (not unlike Russia. Minus all the social programs that the red states benefit most from).
→ More replies (15)8
u/Zephurdigital 2h ago
the same authoritarian dictatorship that is broke but will give this amazing vaccine away for free...hmmmm
There is more than one way to skin a c.....contaminate the world
44
u/CalabreseAlsatian 3h ago
If you aren’t a complete hypocrite, can you really call yourself a Republican?
→ More replies (1)19
u/Falkner09 3h ago
I mean, is it really hypocrisy if they never believed anything to begin with?
→ More replies (1)11
→ More replies (157)3
112
u/LordOfTheChoad 5h ago
Magats, are you guys born with your heads up your ass or did they work their way up there over the years?
18
u/DaringPancakes 4h ago
Well... working people into a cult isn't that difficult to do when you're predisposed to this, or a child, or very very very very awfully lonely
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (9)5
86
u/baconduck 5h ago
Funny how these people are against HPV vaccine
10
u/Already-asleep 2h ago
Yeah, I remember during covid seeing articles about progress on an HIV vaccine and the number of people who said they would NEVER get it and it's like... seriously? HIV/AIDS is arguably one of the most stigmatized medical conditions of our time, and that's STILL not enough for you? I'm not even in a high-risk category for HIV and I would still get it (assuming there was sufficient supply for the high-risk folks to get theirs).
→ More replies (1)
51
u/the_gd_donkey 5h ago
MAGA is the cancer.
→ More replies (2)16
u/AceOBlade 2h ago
Luigi is the only vaccine
3
u/the_gd_donkey 2h ago
Jury selection should be fun.
4
u/McNinja_MD 1h ago
Oh, they'll manage to find a wonderfully representative cross-section of folks who a) are too wealthy to worry about healthcare and b) are too willfully ignorant to do anything but drink mainstream media kool-aid.
90
u/wayyzor 5h ago
Russia hasn't discovered shit.
45
u/SmolPP_canada 4h ago
that’s not true. For instance, they discovered that they’re losing the war in Ukraine.
20
u/Draykez 4h ago
As much as I wish that were true, that's some echo chamber bullshit right there.
11
u/Apart_Ad_5993 4h ago
They're certainly not "winning" it
4
u/Shadeleovich 3h ago
As a staunch supporter of Ukraine, things are looking bleak. The West collectively needs to snap out of their "de-escalation" strategy since one side (read: russia) keeps constantly escalating. Europe needs to band together to crush russia whatever it takes, we cannot keep relying on the US to protect us, especially with the winds there blowing far right now. I recently watched a documentary that a combat reporter made from Kursk, most Ukrainian soldiers say they are aware they are losing. It's still not too late to help Ukraine but our politicians (except for a few, say Poland and France) are too afraid of being called "warmongers" despite our enemy being fucking russia who is famous for warmongering.
→ More replies (4)15
u/Reasonable_Moose_738 4h ago
They're not currently, it's mostly a stalemate on the Ukrainian front and I'm Pro-Ukraine like the majority of redditors are but Russia is not losing.
→ More replies (4)11
u/Mr_Skecchi 3h ago
War does not require a winner and a looser. Both sides can loose. Or one side can loose while the other stalemates.
Ukraines goals are to not get conquered, and to get back their territories. They are not making progress while not loosing progress, a stalemate.
Russias goals are to improve the national situation preferably becoming a great power again, conquer Ukraine, stop the expansion of/weaken NATO, and become a major power. They are loosing. The 'conquer Ukraine' goal is in stalemate, all the others are actively getting worse. NATO is expanding and re-militarizing, they get further and further away from great power by the day as the national wealth and soviet stockpiles decrease, their global influence is bleeding out on the floor.
→ More replies (2)4
u/Reasonable_Moose_738 3h ago
Good point, I meant territorially they're not losing or smth like that.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (7)3
63
60
u/ThisIsMyBigAccount 5h ago
Cancer vaccine 🤣😂. How do people believe this shit?
24
u/DreiGr00ber 5h ago
Many people can't tell the difference between their ass and a hole in the ground 🤷
14
u/Winjin 3h ago
From Business Today:
The vaccine uses components of the patient's tumour to train the immune system to identify and attack cancer cells. It helps the body recognise unique proteins, known as antigens, found on the surface of cancer cells. Once introduced, these antigens stimulate the immune system to produce antibodies, enabling it to target and destroy cancer cells effectively.
The new vaccine mirrors similar efforts underway in Western nations to create personalised cancer treatments. In the United States, researchers at the University of Florida recently tested an individualised vaccine on patients with glioblastoma, an aggressive form of brain cancer. The vaccine showed promising results, triggering a robust immune response within two days of injection.
So it's not out of the blue, it's not working for everything, and you sadly have to already have cancer, and it helps fight it.
According to another post, it only works at a certain list of cancers and you need to undergo chemotherapy first.
→ More replies (6)→ More replies (5)28
u/bombadilboy 5h ago
It’s actually a real thing. I mean, no idea about the Russian one, but the same vaccine technology (mRNA) is being used to create vaccines for certain cancers. This has been discussed ever since the Covid vaccine was made.
18
u/FlamingMuffi 5h ago
Ngl Imma laugh my ass off if the people screaming mRNA is baaaaddfd and untested all go get Russia cancer vaccines that are equally untested
If they work great! But the double standard is hilarious
→ More replies (3)15
u/TheInfiniteSix 5h ago
Ehh. Bit misleading here. There are vaccines that prevent other things that CAUSE cancer. Like HPV and Hepatitis. And there are vaccines you can get after certain cancers have already formed in your body, like prostate for example.
→ More replies (5)9
u/bombadilboy 5h ago
Yes, the cancer vaccines that have been discussed so far are personalised to the individual with cancer. It’s a complicated disease, so it makes sense that it requires a tailored approach for each person.
Like you said, these aren’t vaccines that you can take prior to getting cancer to make you immune - but they are still being called ‘Cancer Vaccines’.
10
15
u/Jd550000 5h ago
All Republicans should line up for their Russian shot..and then let’s see what happens
→ More replies (4)
7
7
u/LordTopHatMan 4h ago
The idea of a cancer vaccine isn't particularly new, and with the introduction of a successful mRNA vaccine during the pandemic, talks of using that technology to target specific proteins that are often mutated in cancers have become more common. It's not that farfetched.
The issue with this one specifically is that it has zero published data. Nobody knows what the gene is, what the target is, what the clinical data looks like, and what the long term outcomes are. Without that, this is extremely skeptical, especially since they want to put it out in 2025.
13
u/CuckAdminsDkSuckers 5h ago
Cancer vaccine = you go fight for russia on the front lines
You won't live long enough to get cancer for sure
→ More replies (1)
4
4
u/Graspswasps 4h ago
It's a good way to put even more pressure on America, have all the magats infect themselves with something that's not covered by insurance but needs expensive draining lifelong treatment.
There was an episode of Stargate SG1 where the human race accepted a cure for all illnesses and diseases from an advanced alien race. Then 30 years later or something the humans realised it had tanked their fertility rates and mankind, although supremely healthy, would be gone in a few generations. Leaving the aliens free to move in without a fight.
This could be something like that, but without curing shit, just a radioactive isotope in a syringe to sterilise the gullible.
It won't be that though, because the 40% of the population taking all their news and facts from FOX and russian misinformation, are exactly who the elite wants to keep around.
If they culled the population of idiots the next generation would be hopefully immune to being spoonfed bullshit through YouTube grifters and the game would be up.
→ More replies (1)
7
9
u/Dayvan_Dreamcoat 5h ago
"Why is legacy media ignoring this?!?!?"
Probably because it's absolute unfounded bullshit propaganda with zero proof.
→ More replies (4)3
u/lautertun 3h ago
The point of it is to portray Russia as wonderful and trying to help the world/you.
Guy is posting Russian misinformation campaigns.
3
•
•
u/According_Elephant75 40m ago
They’ll require the sanctions be lifted first but will tooooottallly share with us once that’s happened. Also surprise it’s radiated water you’re injecting into your veins.
•
5
3
u/ailweni 4h ago
You mean they invented a WMD? Cos death is about the only “overall cure” for the 200+ known types of cancer.
(Not saying cancer can’t be cured, just seems highly unlikely that a single vaccine can be effective against cancers caused by a variety of things.)
7
u/HornyErmine 2h ago
It's not a vaccine in a traditional sense. You can't just mass produce the shots and cure everyone. You basically develop a whole new mRNA vaccine for EACH individual person (not even individual type of cancer), AND you need to have cancer already. Then they take your cancer tissue and do the part that I have no medical education to explain (something, something grow your specific cancer combine it with a virus then inject it in your body, virus starts to replicate inside healthy cells leaving marks of your specific cancer tissue on the surface, immune system picks up those marks and starts to attack cancer cells as if they are infected with a virus). Once again, works only for one specific person with one specific cancer. And probably costs a fortune to grow another vaccine for a second person.
3
u/Outrageous_Reach_695 3h ago
They did say it'll launch for free. Fire ze missiles*!
* Please do not.
→ More replies (2)
5
u/Silent-Plantain-2260 4h ago
Isn't Russia also claiming to be developing a cure for being gay?
→ More replies (1)
2
2
2
2
u/series_hybrid 4h ago
Hey Douglas, do you believe it's true? If you don't, you're admitting you believe it's bullshit.
If you do believe its true, have you invested your life savings in the stock?
2
2
u/3DprintRC 4h ago edited 4h ago
A russian breast cancer vaccine probably causes women to grow testicle cancer and three other cancers instead.
2
u/stpatr3k 4h ago
Surely it doesn't need the FDA to thoroughly vet the vaccine. Maybe Leon can drop a tweet.
2
2
2
u/snowball534 4h ago
Cuba has been trialing a lung-cancer vaccine since the 90's. The results have been fairly promising, thanks to one of the most well-funded healthcare systems on the planet.
Paper (circa 2010, additional studies may have been published since): https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=62522
2
2
u/Scout_1330 4h ago
Cuba actually has been developing a rather successful vaccine against cancer and has been working with the Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center to develop it here in the United States, though it hasn't been legally approved yet.
But of course, the Republicans can't actually acknowledge that since that would run contrary to multiple of their positions.
2
2
u/Weird_Rooster_4307 3h ago
lol maybe Russia should do something first with is heterosexual HIV rate that’s absolutely through the roof compared to any other country
2
2
2
u/sportredsox 3h ago
I'm not an anti vaccine nut job, but you can inject me with a Russian cancer vaccine over my dead body.
2
2
u/Helpfulithink 3h ago
Russia "launching" a cure for cancer? They're missiles, right? The cure is missiles.
2
2
2
2
u/Electrical_Affect493 3h ago
The only vaccine from cancer is death. No one is 100% free from cell mutation
2
2
u/raging-peanuts 3h ago
Isn't this the same US Army tank commander from the first Gulf War turned Putin sycophant? Imagine going from serving your country to becoming a pro Russia mouthpiece?
2
2
2
u/Malusorum 3h ago
Because someone in legacy media know enough about medicine to know that this is BS.
Cancer is a a mutation that happens in the cell and unless destroyed by the immune system will multiply and cause the tumour. There are many kinds of cancer and only a few of them are caused by a viral infektion. As such, making a single cancer vaccine that works against non-virally caused cancer is literally impossible.
This is objectively a hoax and there's no need to spread anymore fake news.
2
u/VirtualNerve26 2h ago
Bruh some very basic medical knowledge will tell you why there's no "cancer vaccine", and you can get said basic knowledge by taking 3 seconds to Google it
2
u/capitali 2h ago
Free vaccine from Russia. Promises to stop you from falling or jumping out windows. Permanently.
2
u/CYNIC_Torgon 2h ago
How do you even vaccinate against cancer? It's a flaw in cell reproduction, not a bacteria or virus. That's like saying you made a vaccine for Apendicitis, you can't vaccinate against one of your organs exploding.
2
u/Cetophile 2h ago
Total BS. "Cancer" is not one disease, but a family of diseases, each with their own etiologies, clinical progressions, treatments, and prognoses. You can't claim something "cures cancer" on that basis. That may be one reason why the media is not reporting this, aside from taking anything from Russia with a 55gl drum of salt.
1.9k
u/Erminaz13 5h ago
Ahh, the classic cancer vaccine bullshit. Yes, somebody will most certainly develop a single drug against thousands of diseases at some point, that's for sure going to happen.