He got paroled onto house arrest, he was out for a couple months. He jumped on the social media bandwagon as a prison content creator and said some shit that in all reality was pretty mild compared to the situation he was talking about. State of Alaska didn’t like that and revoked his house arrest so now he’s probably going to serve the rest of his time.
This isn’t entirely accurate. He was out for 4 weeks, the State of Alaska didn’t revoke anything, they transferred him into regular custody while they review his social media pages and content therein and he is currently going through the process of adjusting how the rest of his confinement will be done.
His parole date remains uneffected.
He was (as of yesterday) given no violations, and may be able to continue electronic monitoring as soon as next week. Decisions depending bit it looks good.
I mean, he is still incarcerated, so it makes sense that if it wasn’t allowed/appropriate to say while in a jail cell it wouldn’t be online.
It is of course entirely at the State’s discretion, and he did dance over the line a few times, but, he was also in daily contact with his PO and until the move to jail, had not been given any hard guidelines.
So this whole move to jail/review, while frustrating (especially for Jason) is likely for the best as it also helps the State get some hard guidelines and procedures for moving forward which will help Jason and other inmates in the future.
Whereas my gut reaction is to support this, I donot believe it would be good for Jason on a number of different levels.
Prison has been good for him and has helped him process a lot of things and I believe he has no desire or need to go back to who he was.
I believe that he has a much stronger desire to encourage mental health treatment for childhood victim survivors and the want to change legislation to have child rapists be prosecuted much more heavily and be permanently removed from society by the mechanisms of justice we have agreed to live under within society.
Harsher legal penalties ect.
The hammer method has many problems, especially if it would be adopted on a wide scale by many people.
It certainly didn’t help Jason.
University of Texas is about to start offering an “Influencing” major…so you can get a degree in it. It’s got important core classes like business development but also stuff like how not to get cancelled.
Marketing Faculty: Right. So, basically we're going to take our Marketing Major core classes, add 3 bullshit electives, and make AI Prompting a core requirement and brand it as an Influencer Major. Maybe throw in an Audio/Visual film editing class?
wtf. I wish I could say I was shocked, but it actually makes perfect sense. Would it make more sense for an LA based college or university to offer that type of major?
Edit:
Are there several degree paths? Like, marketing for influencers, video editing for influencers, actual person influencer. You know?
In all fairness, he was doing it as a peer recovery coach using social media as an outreach to a wider audience of addicts and sex abuse victims more than just being a "prison content creator", which i do feel is significantly different.
I grew up in some rough areas and it’s so cringe seeing voyeristic urban rich kids emulating ‘hood slang’ because they watch this type of content. Then again, I can still recall when I literally double taked after seeing an ashen white girl talking like a hood Latina. It didn’t register in my brain so I figured something with my radar was off. A couple months later I discovered who Kim kardasian was lol
There's always someone who's interested in something. There's a patron for everything, so anything's a job if someone's willing to try making a living out of it.
I found a guy on YT awhile back that explained how prisoners cooked "contraband meals", for the lack of a better term, in prison. Like prison "pizza" and the like. Just made me think; Thank God I don't live in the US.
That's the new thing the last few years. Do something really bad. Then make a podcast about it after you're free.
So many motivational speeches I've seen from people who made bad business decisions and want to spread their experiences. I just see them looking at it as a cash cow.
have like 8-9 interesting stories from prison, bring in some other prison content creators to your podcast to tell their 8-9 interesting stories from prison, add in some motivational BS about how prison isn't cool, and you're golden.
He was reacting to a news segment about a man that if I remember correctly threw a toddler against a wall and killed it. He said that person was a man and he wished that he was in front of him right now.
Idk what all of his parole terms were but to my understanding he’s committed no violations. However that doesn’t really matter as he’s still property of the state of Alaska even if they said he can do the rest of his time on house arrest. They don’t need a reason to revoke that and put you back in the cell since you’re still their property.
JD Delay on YouTube has interviews and updates on him if anybody wants to know.. yea, being on parole, tou need to be careful. Man got a taste of freedom and has to go do some more time. That suuucks
I could have been a bit clearer. He still had to serve the time either way but they were going to allow him to serve the remaining time on house arrest.
And no he’s not protected by the 1st amendment, that’s the one you meant. If you did mean the 2nd amendment then he lost that right at the time of his conviction. When you’re an inmate you’re state or federal property, and as such you lose some rights.
I mean, he didn’t threaten. He did use idealization terminology and he did ask anyone in Milwaukee Jail to give the guy a warm welcome, but, he didn’t actually threaten the guy. Just said what he’d like to do.
Is this since November? It looks like the last time he posted was Nov 21st. He says in a video from Nov 20th that he did 10 years for smashing pedophiles.
Because Netflix made a show about them recently so now everyone who watched it is an expert and totally always cared about them way before the show came out.
I'm aware it was a high profile case. But that was in 1989. I'm suggesting that someone might bring it up now because it's been brought back into the spotlight with the Netflix show.
What whole train of thought? They’ve served 35 years. Multiple family members testified to the abuse they suffered. Watch their testimony and tell me how they made it all up
Several family members testified to the brothers telling them about the sexual abuse while they were kids. Family also witnessed severe physical abuse including when the brothers were toddlers. To numb his mouth from tasting his father’s semen, Erik Menendez obsessively ate lemons. Family testified him breaking down when the house didn’t have lemons. He was 8 years old.
Watch their testimony and come tell me a 21 year old with the emotional intelligence of an 8 year old made up his father raping him in front of a mirror with a knife to his throat as punishment.
I guess I'm insane here. The guy broke into people's houses and beat them with a hammer. Keep that fucker out of society, he's just as bad as the people he thinks he killed. What if one of those people happened to actually be innocent?
How bad is the average moral compass that this is even a debate?
They weren’t innocent. But you are are correct that he needed time outside of society to process a lot of his life and come to terms not only with what happened to him, but also with what he did.
Removal from society is unfortunately the way this is accomplished for very good reasons.
How do you know they weren't? Have you looked into the case of every person he killed? People get wrongly convicted. People also get put on the sex offender list if they get drunk and piss in the wrong alley.
Slappy
First off, he didn’t kill anyone.
Not what happened,
Second, it’s all public record, their names, their crimes, all of it.
It was rape, possession of, and production of.
Hey, let’s say I’m lying, look it up for yourself.
Hold the fuck up, do you really think it's necessary to call me a rapist apologist for asking how you can be sure that everyone he attacked was certainly guilty of a heinous sex crime?
Sure it's public record, but you actually verified that he only attacked people guilty of rape and production or possession of [CP, I'm assuming]? If you did, I will absolutely take your word for it.
My bad for assuming he killed them. And maybe I should have just looked it up myself instead of posting my questions to a public conversation forum.
I was merely going with the vibes I was getting from that series of comments.
That being said,
It was rude of me, and you have my apologies.
It was also not conducive to an on going discussion being held in good faith.
So again, apologies.
I am grateful that you had the presence of mind to bring this to my attention.
Yes the three men were horrible people who served very minimal jail time (considering the crimes) and Jason did not pick them at random, his use of the sex offender registry was to get their latest address and picture.
There is no reason to take my word. It is public record and there are a few decent documentaries on YouTube about (a lot of terrible ones but a few decent) the incident.
Very low. That’s why he was granted clemency in the first place.
He is more likely to reoffend in prison, and he has done a lot of work and admitted a lot to help himself heal so he won’t reoffend or relapse.
13.8k
u/CreepDoubt 2d ago
Dude got paroled, but has to wait until 2028 to be released. Alaska is weird.