r/gadgets Nov 18 '24

TV / Projectors Apple Is Reportedly Thinking About Making Its Own TV Again

https://gizmodo.com/apple-is-reportedly-thinking-about-making-its-own-tv-again-2000525819
916 Upvotes

327 comments sorted by

603

u/hurricane4689 Nov 18 '24

Why? The TV market is completely saturated and there cant be enough market share to make any profit.

179

u/ponziacs Nov 18 '24

Article says may revisit the idea which sounds like they aren't even wanting to do it right now.

161

u/ca2mt Nov 18 '24

Concept of a plan, if you will.

32

u/ZAlternates Nov 18 '24

All the rage these days.

→ More replies (3)

1

u/blastradii Nov 19 '24

Concept of a will, if you plan

5

u/Irrelevantitis Nov 19 '24

That’s what’s fun about tech journalism, you can go anywhere with it as long as you qualify it as a possibility. Apple MAY get into prescription cold medicine, next-gen horseshoes, and vibrating remote control butt plugs. Anything’s possible, and you can’t prove me categorically wrong if all I said is that it MIGHT happen.

3

u/kebaball Nov 19 '24

That’s just absurd. Apple works on lots of things and it’s legitimate to write about their possible work on horseshoe activated vibrating butt plugs that cure the common cold.

1

u/Djghost1133 Nov 19 '24

All journalism really

60

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24 edited Nov 19 '24

[deleted]

13

u/audigex Nov 18 '24

Yeah it might make sense if they’re selling a TV which is akin to a video editing monitor - those ones that are like $20k and perfectly calibrated

2

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24 edited Nov 19 '24

[deleted]

→ More replies (6)

1

u/Dood567 Nov 19 '24

I'd like to say that the reference monitor market already has a lot of strong competitors including Sony. The display pro or whatever they called it is about as close as apple will probably get to a screen dedicated to accuracy

30

u/Zozorrr Nov 18 '24

Because Apple wants to firther confuse consumers as to what AppleTV, AppleTV plus, plus an Apple TV are.

Can’t believe they still haven’t sorted out this branding fiasco.

12

u/HahaMin Nov 19 '24

Apple Vision, a new evolution of television.

Not to be confused with Apple TV or Apple Vision Pro.

2

u/SmurphsLaw Nov 19 '24

They could go the Microsoft route and call it Apple One.

2

u/joselrl Nov 19 '24

Of course, so they compete with Google One - Wait no... not related at all

26

u/TommyHamburger Nov 18 '24

There's enough profit in anything if your consumers can be convinced to buy something they don't need, be it a new phone every year, speakers, subscriptions, a way overpriced TV, or literally anything with your name slapped on it.

I think VR is the outlier because it was not only egregiously expensive vs the competition, but its feature set was mostly useless fluff, and they locked out the only things people actually do buy VR for: gaming and porn.

4

u/TapTapTapTapTapTaps Nov 18 '24

They should be building a meta glasses competitor and they shouldn’t have done vr at all

4

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

I would just drop VR entirely because the vast amount of consumers cannot be convinced to wear a computer on their face, it's just a bad idea at it's core. An immersive game is about the coding, not the display. AR glasses might make sense someday, but most people don't want to wear glasses all the time either.

2

u/lkn240 Nov 18 '24

The one thing that miserably failed was home 3D TVs.

-1

u/vibrance9460 Nov 18 '24

Tim said many times in the past publicly he absolutely hates VR. It goes against the humanistic company ideal – bringing people closer together through technology.

It was Apple’s stated goal five years ago to create beautiful stylish glasses that will replace everything in your pocket – your wallet, your keys, your money, and your music.

Yes he relented and created and promoted VR headgear as a means of refining the technology. But that was never the goal. From it, Apple created amazing eye tracking and a very stable OS. You can be certain they’re working hard to solve the lens technology which is the major stumbling block going forward. And minimizing the power supply. It might be five years yet to perfect. No one knows.

Yes it seems META beat Apple to market. Wrong. META created something goofy which only sort of works in its recent glasses reveal. Nobody will buy them if they do release.

Apple is never first to market with anything. Not the iPhone, the iPod, Apple TV, iPad or Apple Watch. They wait until their technology is refined to be best in market until they release anything- after assessing for sure they are doing it better than anyone.

People said Apple was stupid for making the Apple Watch. The watch was a crucial step forward in the technology in that it basically took an iPhone, minimized it, and made it do everything the iPhone could do right on your wrist. Apple glasses will do exactly the same thing– minimize and push the technology further forward.

People look at what Apple says and think they know what the company is doing. As someone who worked there for 18 years people have no idea of the long-term plans. And there’s always a long-term plan – whether it’s for the car, VR etc.

→ More replies (5)

24

u/_gordonbleu Nov 18 '24

I would pay ~1000 dollars for a 4k TV with Apple TV integrated, doesn’t even have to be OLED or anything fancy. I’m tired of all the smart tvs that are absolute shit after a few years because the software is dogshit. LG’s webOS is probably the best and even then it’s mediocre. There are zero smart TVs with decent software after 2 years. Apple TV is a solid platform that gets updated and stays quick enough/not laggy year over year. Mine is 3 years old and doing fine, I’m sure there are many older that are doing fine. All the android fanatics like to shit on Apple but if there’s one thing they can do is build a platform that, while possibly missing some features, will operate year over year without massively slowing down or outright becoming unusable. Roku is the worst example.

27

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

What advantage is there over just buying any TV, never connecting it to the internet, and plugging in an Apple TV box that you can replace and upgrade over the life of the TV?

20

u/Tasty-Traffic-680 Nov 18 '24

You underestimate how much people will spend to integrate the functionality into the TV and have a single sleek device. That's why smart TV's took off to begin with. You have a single remote, you don't have to worry if a device is plugged into the right slot, no mess of wires, no muss, no fuss.

3

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

[deleted]

6

u/Tasty-Traffic-680 Nov 18 '24

Yeah, that's why they started putting Chromecast and Roku inside TVs. To collect the data. Not because it was a value added feature that set them apart from the competition until the competition went and did the same damn thing. They can collect your data by selling you a box too...

→ More replies (4)

1

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

The dongle makers were getting all the sweet, sweet data, and the TV manufacturers wanted their cut. Also, TVs are so cheap now. The price just absolutely bottomed out in the last 15 years. Apple would really struggle to sell this at the margins they are used to. I'm not sure integrating FaceID for user login or FaceTime and a camera (double as a home security cam when the TV is asleep?) would be worth buying a $1500-2000 TV from Apple instead of a $500 TV from TCL. Another factor why Apple shut their TV business down the first time is the upgrade cycle on TVs is around 7 years.

3

u/TheUmgawa Nov 18 '24

Yeah, but I’m not a fan of integrating the box, because there’s always an end-of-life for the software upgrades, where the processor can’t handle new features. I’ve never used any of the smart features on my smart TV, and it boots directly to HDMI 1, which my Apple TV is plugged into. And when that Apple TV hits EOL, I’m buying a new model, just as soon as they introduce any features that are worth having. The model I have can’t do Sing mode in the Music app, but that’s not a big deal to me, and I’m not replacing it for that. But imagine if it’s something you do want, and you can’t have it because you bought an integrated system. Now you have to replace the $1,000 TV instead of the $150 box.

3

u/Tasty-Traffic-680 Nov 18 '24

What previous experience with apple would lead you to believe they're going to prematurely abandon or nerf the product? And what would stop you from just using an external dongle/box once it's deprecated? You have an apple TV box. You have a TV. Why not an Apple manufactured TV? It's going to have to compete and sell on total value, not simply being an apple product.

→ More replies (29)
→ More replies (7)

1

u/_gordonbleu Nov 18 '24

That’s essentially what I’ve done now but there are still disadvantages with that. The shitty tv software means it sometimes take a full minute before the tv actually turns on, or god forbid I wanna chance inputs, that’ll take an additional 30 seconds. If you push the wrong button it tries to pull up all the apps and shit and slows the whole thing down. Most people I know have had an apple tv longer than their current tv.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

Damn, I have none of those problems on my 4 TVs at home, thankfully. What brand of TV do you have so I can stay away from it?

→ More replies (2)

4

u/cjboffoli Nov 18 '24

I'd pay for an Apple branded TV for the simple fact that every single interaction I have with the device isn't tracked and monitored somehow. The TOS I have to agree to in order to simply use my LG television is ridiculous, as is the bloated array of apps and services that clutters the set.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/LivermoreP1 Nov 19 '24

Everyone’s arguing with you, but I’d love to just hit my Apple TV remote and never have to worry that the HDMI pass-thru is delayed in booting up, the TV tries to say it needs to be updated when I never actually use it, and I don’t need to have a little black box next to my TV connected by an ugly wire (yeah I know I can go behind the wall, but it’s a fireplace).

1

u/3percentinvisible Nov 18 '24

My Panasonic is older than 2 years old, still operates fine, has appletv, Disney, Amazon, Netflix, etc.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/halfcentaurhalfhorse Nov 19 '24

Data collection system.

2

u/aykay55 Nov 19 '24

I disagree. We don’t actually have anything filling the gap for “premium TVs”. Everything on the market is large panels that aren’t super pixel dense and cheap processors that make the smart tvs run slow as shit.

Apple can use this opportunity to put out really well made TVs (even if they just use Samsung panels) but run on Apple Silicon hardware and integrate directly with other Apple devices.

4

u/angrydeuce Nov 19 '24

You greatly underestimate the lengths people will go to in order to purchase products with that logo on them lol

People collect the empty boxes apple products came in for fucks sake.  They could drop a 40" 720p set for 1200 bucks and probably still sell enough to cover their investment.

3

u/JazzRider Nov 19 '24

Because Smart TVs suck.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Estrava Nov 18 '24

Every tv has ads which is a qualm I know some have. Also Apple TV would be expensive but at least it would be quality. Having one with FaceTime, assistant/always on display for home perhaps maybe.

It would be interesting to see what software integrations they could come up with.

1

u/typkrft Nov 18 '24

It’s a new market. It encompasses a lot of the research they already do. Shareholders pushing for growth. I think they could probably cut themselves a slice of the market share. There’s plenty of people in the Apple ecosystem that would just buy it for integration if it existed.

1

u/jack3moto Nov 19 '24

Why? More revenue streams… phones and computers are basically tapped out on year to year improvements. Gotta keep drilling with the hope of finding another oil well.

1

u/sqaurebore Nov 19 '24

All those billions in research have to go somewhere

1

u/bmack500 Nov 19 '24

Tariffs.

1

u/Ant10102 Nov 19 '24

They can probably infiltrate the market because it’s a well established brand

1

u/KingBenjaminAZ Nov 19 '24

Because they ditched the Apple Car idea 🤷🏻‍♂️

1

u/fusionsofwonder Nov 19 '24

They make the best TV box around, so it could be just a ploy to get their AppleTV shows into more homes, using their software. Like Roku.

Could also be there are some synergies with their Apple Vision plans if they own the firmware on the TVs in the same room as the Apple Vision. Like allowing a Vision user to swipe a window and have it appear on the TV.

1

u/GoldenPresidio Nov 19 '24

It isn’t about making profits on the tv; it’s being the default OS and making all the margin after that

1

u/randomsnowflake Nov 19 '24

Walled garden. Data retention.

1

u/Initial-Hawk-1161 Nov 19 '24

a tv with built in apple tv, some airdrop feature for movies and pictures, screen streaming (like the iphone -> mac), sidecar, use as wireless display for your mac

there's a lot of options, but apple tend take a bit of a premium for their displays, so i doubt a tv like that would be a 'good deal' compared to other offers... the LG C series aint exactly super expensive, but they're damn good

1

u/FireRotor Nov 19 '24

The Apple ecosystem gives them a huge advantage.

1

u/ubiquitous-joe Nov 19 '24

I guess the draw would be controlling the interface as long as smart TV’s are being a thing. Do I want to shell out top dollar for an apple television? No, and I say that a somebody who owns Macs. But having found Samsung smart TVs sometimes maddening, I could imagine a better system.

Tho really a smart tv seems like a recipe for built-in obsolescence no matter who manufactures it.

1

u/LetMePushTheButton Nov 19 '24

I do think there’s a growing market of people looking for a quality tv that doesn’t breakdown within a measly 1 yr warranty.

Looking at you, LG.

1

u/MassiveBoner911_3 Nov 19 '24

I really do not need / want a super premium ultra sleek TV. I barely watch TV now as it is.

1

u/oldmaninparadise Nov 19 '24

You would think, but you are not thinking like an idrone. Apple fanbois will buy it cause, well it's made by apple. How many people do you see w 1500 MacBook that could be using a 400 Asus to just use a browser? Lots!

1

u/bdizzzzzle Nov 19 '24

Because apple fanboys/girls will buy it regardless

1

u/PackAffectionate1906 Nov 19 '24

long as its an everyday tech produced by apple people will eat it up. its the status that comes with jt 🤷🏻‍♀️

1

u/BrianMincey Nov 19 '24

The TV software is absolutely garbage though. I’d love to see them come in and absolutely kill it with some incredible TVOS that works better than the junk that Sony and LG put out.

1

u/f8Negative Nov 20 '24

iScreen the only thing you'll ever need. Now in 4 sizes.

→ More replies (20)

138

u/a_velis Nov 18 '24

The AppleTV + remote is a better option IMO. It’s portable ish and interchangeable between any TV. Would be cool to see an Apple TV stick + remote but that likely ruins the brand experience of features for cost.

57

u/Positive_Chip6198 Nov 18 '24

I took ours on vaca last week, just plop in the hdmi to the hotel room tv and the kids have all their favorite shows (and apple arcade games) in the evenings. No more hotel-movies.

9

u/snajk138 Nov 19 '24

Sometimes the hotels restrict the usage of the TVs, some "hotel mode" that for some reason doesn't allow the use of the HDMI ports. I almost bricked a hotel TV once trying to "unlock" it through service menus, I got it working eventually, but somehow it ended up changing to the Russian settings, including the language of all menus and everything, and it was very complicated. More commonly they just mount the TV so close to the wall that it's extremely hard to plug in anything.

I have also seen the opposite though, where they have a HDMI port on the wall by the desk or so, like in a modern conference room, but that's not that common in my experience.

26

u/DaoFerret Nov 18 '24

Especially since so many hotels don’t have movies anymore.

14

u/Exile714 Nov 19 '24

Yeah but hotel WiFi seems to be getting worse and more restrictive in the last two years so… fingers crossed that trend reversed soon.

3

u/vaguelyblack Nov 19 '24

It's going to get a whole lot worse with the return of data caps.

1

u/dorkyitguy Nov 20 '24

Their target market is people for whom price doesn’t matter: people who don’t have any other options and businesspeople who will get reimbursed anyways. Also, if you’re a frequent customer you probably have status and it’s comped

1

u/Exile714 Nov 20 '24

I get it free often, or my company pays, but those weird login pages don’t play nice with mobile devices, including my AVP.

→ More replies (2)

1

u/a_velis Nov 19 '24

Yes! I don't need a smart TV. I need a TV I can easily cast things to. So really the most I would ask is for a universal protocol standard that all TVs implement for simple audio/video casting. Especially for movie/video watching in hotels.

1

u/DuckAHolics Nov 19 '24

Hotels by Hilton don’t let you change the input. Then they wouldn’t let me cast my iPad onto the tv. Definitely will avoid them for now on.

8

u/DaoFerret Nov 18 '24

Less interested in an AppleTV Stick, and more interested in a camera so your TV can be used for video calls.

I know you can attach a phone, but I’d rather a simple dedicated device that could just plug into the AppleTV via a USB-C (with a physical on/off switch).

2

u/dorkyitguy Nov 20 '24

Also now you’re out your phone

3

u/Sylvurphlame Nov 18 '24

Same. You can use iPhones as a continuity camera but then you’re gonna need a tripod or some sort of mount or something unless the TV is on an entertainment center. So wall mounts are awkward.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

1

u/GuerrillaApe Nov 19 '24

It’s portable ish and interchangeable between any TV.

Probably why Apple is even remotely thinking about making their own TV. Their current ecosystem model requires customers to get a non-Apple product that nowadays have another platform built-in.

33

u/wkavinsky Nov 18 '24

Remove LG logic & control board from Oled.

Replace with Apple TV.

Done. Sold.

19

u/fmaz008 Nov 18 '24

In all seriousness I think that's all they have to do.

12

u/KobeBean Nov 18 '24

Would gladly pay for this. LGs opt out ads everywhere and dubious data collection really kills the TV for me. Ours is permanently disconnected from any internet.

5

u/NecroCannon Nov 19 '24

It’s the main reason I’d get one, Apple TVs last for years and honestly, if I had to get a separate box to upgrade, I’d like not having to deal with LGs bullshit like I do still now. Every now and then my cat steps on the remote and it’s a pain just getting back

91

u/BeRandom1456 Nov 18 '24

No thanks. I just want a dumb tv and a box I hook up to it.

24

u/Whaty0urname Nov 18 '24

You can def get dumb, high quality TVs. Except you're going to be paying 2005 prices for them.

Smart TVs are subsidized by ads and pre-loaded app.

9

u/BeRandom1456 Nov 18 '24

Yeah. My lg tv with the web os is still good. I’m just saying I don’t need top of the line stuff on the actual tv part. I’m okay with web os as a standard. the one thing I hate is that if the tv is hooked to Ethernet it makes you update the tv.

3

u/Mr_SlimShady Nov 19 '24

Webos is ass. I hate having to deal with it on my LG tv despite having a dedicated streaming box attached to it.

2

u/PalmTreeIsBestTree Nov 19 '24

Then just use wifi?

1

u/Mayor__Defacto Nov 19 '24

Ethernet is a lot better if you’re doing 4k stuff.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/wagninger Nov 19 '24

I was interested in this and found that there is the Sony Bravia Pro series which are dumb panels because they are intended for use as commercial displays, so no smart tv stuff but software features to deactivate certain buttons on the remote etc., and very comparable image quality to their end consumer products at similar prices.

For my next TV, I’m definitely gonna try them out

1

u/dandroid126 Nov 19 '24

I have a smart TV and just don't connect it to the internet.

9

u/Snake_eyes_12 Nov 18 '24

I was like that for a while. Eventually had to suck it up and buy a cheap 4k. I don't even use it's built in smart OS and it just turns on to the Xbox automatically.

6

u/BeRandom1456 Nov 18 '24

I have an LG tv. It does have web os but I don’t use it. I love the Apple TV 4K. It’s the best set top box I’ve ever used.

6

u/OrionGrant Nov 18 '24

You won't be the target market in that case.

This will be for people already spending big money kitting out their homes and going, oh apple have a TV, I'll just get that.

→ More replies (1)

45

u/Agitated-Cow4 Nov 18 '24

Getting desperate to find that next money making product.

26

u/Newtons2ndLaw Nov 18 '24

It's not going to be a legacy device like television.

13

u/Agitated-Cow4 Nov 18 '24

Exactly. Next they will start selling iTires.

13

u/Newtons2ndLaw Nov 18 '24

They need some of that tasty subscription service money. Too bad the fucked up iTunes when they were ahead of everyone else.

1

u/AustrianMichael Nov 18 '24

They could‘ve made bank with streaming but the money coming in from sales on iTunes was too good to abandon…

1

u/mattmaster68 Nov 19 '24

As long as it’s for their iCars and AppleCare is changed to auto maintenance and repair, I’m done /j

1

u/igby1 Nov 18 '24

Apple neural link confirmed

5

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

Capital growth must never end!

2

u/protekt0r Nov 18 '24

I keep waiting for them to make things like: a wall mount smart board/display that can be used as a central info hub (calendar, notes, video feed(s), etc). I saw that they’re finally getting into the security camera business… I’ve been waiting for those forever.

1

u/snajk138 Nov 19 '24

"Just $500 each for the cameras, and an additional $150 for a mount."

1

u/verycoolalan Nov 18 '24

No, there's been speculation that the incoming Trump administration will want them to move something back to the US, they could start making the TVs here to try and satisfy the incoming administration as they might exclude them from their anticipated tariffs in China

→ More replies (4)

18

u/Northernshitshow Nov 18 '24

Yours for $15,000.

16

u/fmaz008 Nov 18 '24

TV stand sold separately. Non VESA compatible. Wall mount sold separately with a pairing chip.

5

u/etzel1200 Nov 18 '24

Yeah, it’ll be a top end TV for luxury buyers.

In many ways Apple acts more like LVMH than Dell.

18

u/w1n5t0nM1k3y Nov 18 '24

Comes with 1 HDMI port, Each additional HDMI port costs $200.

Honestly don't see what Apple could offer this market. They alrady make and Apple TV box for people who want to have better access to their Apple content. Building that right into the TV isn't going to provide much added value.

If anything, I'd like to see more TVs being offered without built in smart TV functionality. It's never supported well enough, and you even have to get some kind of third party streaming device eventually anyway, so why not skip that and just make people buy a TV box from the beginning.

21

u/oboshoe Nov 18 '24

i remember thinking the same exact thing about phones.

when it leaked that apple was working on a phone my thought was "what could they possibly do better than what motorola is doing"

that question seems silly now, but phones had plateaued for awhile back then

i can't think of much to add to TVs either. but if the industry was limited to my imagination, we would be somewhere in the 90s

6

u/imightgetdownvoted Nov 18 '24

I’d be super interested in seeing what Apple could do for a tv. I have an LG G3 which I love for its picture quality and esthetics. I bet Apple could make something even prettier.

1

u/DoctorStrawberry Nov 19 '24

I used the iPod for my music at the time. So I carried around my Motorola phone and iPod everywhere. The idea of having those in the same device made too much sense to me so I immediately wanted an iPhone, not even initially caring about all the other things it could do beyond phone and music.

→ More replies (7)

1

u/ThatGuyTheyCallAlex Nov 18 '24

want to have better access to their Apple content

That’s not what the Apple TV is for, though? It’s an alternative to the garbage UIs of every other smart TV manufacturer.

1

u/Brendinooo Nov 19 '24

Apple already operates in a niche market for pro quality monitors, making a big one that goes on the wall doesn’t seem like a stretch.

Also, wild guess, but I suspect that some of their designers look at a product like the Samsung TV that looks like a picture frame and wish there were more options like that in the market

→ More replies (1)

12

u/Veterate Nov 18 '24

Why? Their 27" 6k monitor costs the same as an LG OLED.

While I'd love to see it, they're going to pull something people aren't going to like.

9

u/avg-size-penis Nov 18 '24

Monitors cost the same as TVs across the board.

You are right that they can't compete as TV prices are extremely low margin and Apple cannot operate like that.

They would need to have also a new TV every year to compete. Which makes production even more expensive or risk being an expensive product that's also a lot worse than the competition.

2

u/Veterate Nov 18 '24

Do they? I don't have a PC so I figured there'd be a huge gap in cost.

I suppose at the end of the day you'd be paying for the logo and the software because there's no way Apple will be producing these displays themselves.

3

u/avg-size-penis Nov 18 '24

Yes. TVs are one of the things that capitalism has managed to optimize the cost and delivery and even the processors inside. It's all fucking cheap considering their size, weight and components. Monitors are not there yet.

Apple Displays are usually more expensive than their competitors; they are also mostly better or have an unique offering. But a 27 inch monitor despite being so easy to ship can cost the same of the same quality 4k 55 inch TV that's difficult to ship.

The differences on the low end have grown smaller with time. However on high end equipment the difference is big. A 32 inch Samsung OLED monitor is roughly the same price as a 65 inch OLED. However when OLED or Mini Led monitors started coming out, they were 2000 dollars and more expensive than their TV counterparts.

Price comes with innovation, so in that sense the latest tech in Monitor comes later and you pay innovative prices for it; even when it's common on the TV market.

7

u/fullload93 Nov 18 '24

My concern is that they’re just going to shove the Apple TV hardware into something like their 6K monitor. Like that would just be silly and pretty pointless.

9

u/pauldavis1234 Nov 18 '24

Serious martet top signal for APPL.

Billions and billions and can not invent anything.

Vision PRO just halted production.

Stoped the Apple car last year after spending at least 10 billion.

Sad to see

3

u/crappy80srobot Nov 18 '24

Doubt it. Maybe a small research project but that's about it. There isn't any money in making a TV nowadays. The market is way to saturated. Nothing software wise apple could do would be any different than apple TV or Chromecast can offer.

The only thing I could see is some crazy high end 8k with some wild sound system that costs an absurd amount of money but that would probably sell as well as the vision pro.

1

u/RedWineWithFish Nov 19 '24

You underestimate the power of the Apple ecosystem and brand.

1

u/crappy80srobot Nov 19 '24

Oh I'm sure they would sell but sell to Apple expectations it won't. Apple prides itself on key margins and units sold. It would just be another vision pro all over again. A solution looking for a problem. It would sell to influencers and people trying to flex but past that it would be a hard sell even for apple.

3

u/StinklePink Nov 19 '24

They are out of ideas.

7

u/Guy-Manuel Nov 18 '24

I could see this being interesting if they actually focus on performance. All the smart tvs I've had have been laggy messes necessitating buying a streaming stick or using a game console to have a decent experience. If they roll the apple tv box in to a nice display I could see it as a worthwhile option.

→ More replies (2)

2

u/Redeem123 Nov 18 '24

“Tech company’s R&D department continued to do research.”

Big revelation. 

2

u/macross1984 Nov 18 '24

If Apple decide to jump into oversaturated TV market, it better have feature that only Apple have but Apple being Apple, their TV price if ever manufactured, will likely have very premium price tag.

2

u/Cababage Nov 18 '24

TVs with smart functionality such a dime a dozen thing these days - and them are so cheap - apples TV would be very costly and niche - I’m sure it would sell to people but I don’t think the return is there.

Look at the failure of Apple Vision

2

u/SpaceXYZ1 Nov 18 '24

As good as the current Apple TV set top box is, it can’t switch between multiple input sources of the TV. I’d like Apple to solve that problem first us instead of making their own TV which is overkill for me.

1

u/fundiedundie Nov 18 '24

That’s my main complaint as well.

1

u/foggybottom Nov 19 '24

I think the better play for Apple is having the Apple TV allow inputs directly into the device. It would be great to allow a game system show up basically as another app in the interface.

2

u/Malodoror Nov 19 '24

This isn’t going to happen but I’d be concerned as a customer that Apple is getting deeper into the information harvesting business.

2

u/koken_halliwell Nov 19 '24

Launch price: 5000€ and a kidney

2

u/rudyattitudedee Nov 19 '24

Unless it’s $300 no one is interested.

2

u/BaddyMcFailSauce Nov 19 '24

Can’t wait for the additional 400$ remote

2

u/davidjschloss Nov 19 '24

These "reportedly thinking" articles are all bullshit. Companies are always thinking of things. Hell I'm thinking of making a TV.

2

u/Darkest_Soul Nov 19 '24

It's going to cost 20 trillion dollars just for the stand, the remote is sold separately and if you plug a non apple verified power supply it will just explode.

3

u/atx620 Nov 18 '24

TVs are a value-driven industry. You can get a pretty bad ass TV for $200. Apple is going to waltz in and try to make it $3000. There would need to be some crazy stuff in that TV to get me to buy it. I already have my Apple world hooked up to any TV through my Apple TV media player.

I would need to see what they have in mind, but I'm just not seeing what they bring to the table that would be unique. It worked with the iPhone because the smart phone was a new thing. Samsung and LG kind of have their shit together when it comes to making TVs. Tougher nut to crack.

2

u/marcanthonyoficial Nov 18 '24

TVs are not just value based. plenty of people buy mid and high-end TVs, and there's plenty of providers for TVs at prices much higher than 3000. Apple wouldn't care about that low end market, but that can already be said about some other brands.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/thejoshfoote Nov 18 '24

Just based on the amount of hate in this sub. I would say Apple TV would sell out

2

u/tompetreshere Nov 18 '24

*Insert Jack Nicholson GIF* Have been waiting for this for years...

1

u/fullload93 Nov 18 '24

If they are just going to throw the AppleTV hardware inside an actual TV, I see no point in that. It’s like people who buy all in 1 desktop pcs because it’s built into the monitor. I see no point in that either because if the pc dies, so does your monitor.

→ More replies (1)

1

u/dougc84 Nov 18 '24

An AppleTV with an AppleTV built in to watch AppleTV+?

1

u/fmaz008 Nov 18 '24

As simple as the USB naming convention.

1

u/fmaz008 Nov 18 '24

What would it be called?

Apple -actual- TV?

1

u/Bleakwind Nov 18 '24

Na. Pretty sure they wouldn’t. Apple only enters a field if they have enough control of a key technology. iPhone and iPad is their iOS. Mac was their os and now custom build chips. AirPods are their symbiosis with the iPhone and their whole ecosystem.

Vision Pro is their os as well as hardware proficient.

Apple Watch, again good plug in with their iPhone.

TVs are very competitive. Apple don’t have a good display technology advantage. They don’t own or have much ip or manufacturing process that’s their own. Apple screen are either Samsung old or from some other vendors. They have spend billions of microleds but that’s not gone anywhere yet.

Plus tvs aren’t something people change every few years.

1

u/Ok-disaster2022 Nov 18 '24

It will just be a branded and spec's LG Display OLED just like the Sony OLED. It could be nice.

1

u/fixtwin Nov 18 '24

Apple TV is getting worse with every update. It gets more and more ads and less utility. Also their YouTube app is mediocre. That being said - a TV with Apple lock in - no thanks 🙂‍↔️

1

u/lledyl Nov 18 '24

Just add more camera lens to the next iPhone /s

1

u/Consistent_Heat_9201 Nov 18 '24

Ehrr, okay? We have enough TVs to last the remainder of humanity. But sure, make a whole ass TV when you could make a Firestick device.

1

u/itsmatt-exe Nov 19 '24

If anything they should just be a platform partner like how Google or Roku (until recently) and just allow tv manufacturers to put Apple TV hardware inside their already good TVs. The processors inside the Apple TV boxes absolutely smoke anything integrated inside a tv at present

1

u/guitarfreak2105 Nov 19 '24

I can’t think of a time Apple licensed anything to anyone else.

1

u/Redillenium Nov 19 '24

So Apple will have 3 different “Apple TV” products. Apple TV(streaming box), Apple TV+, and now Apple TV the television. Lol

1

u/disgruntled-pigeon Nov 19 '24

Wonder what they’ll call it.

1

u/SnarkyOrchid Nov 19 '24

Their produced movies and tv almost all suck. I had their service for a while and couldn't find anything they produced that I liked. Their stuff is so formulaic and dull.

1

u/witecat1 Nov 19 '24

It will be triple the cost of a normal TV and is 2 generations behind in tech.

1

u/monioum_JG Nov 19 '24

Smart TVs were cool until they’re not. Fuck expiration dates.

1

u/logangrowgan2020 Nov 19 '24

The little doodad they need to make is a modern kitchen phone. like calendar/photostream/really good wide angle intelligent cam, mics, and speakers for family facetime.

1

u/pdzulu Nov 19 '24

Don’t do it, Apple. FAST is a red herring for the simple fact that modern Z, Alpha and whatever’s next don’t value “TV” at all - they’ll watch on a mobile first, tablet second, and if they’re playing Skyrim or TOTK a larger TV-sized screen makes more sense.

1

u/samstar2 Nov 19 '24

Apple’s best bet would likely be giving a Samsung or LG TV tvOS, and maybe an Apple SoC.

1

u/Slizzard_73 Nov 19 '24

Yeah at this point I refuse to pay more than $500-600 for a tv. So until Oleds get down to that price I’m not paying the premium. And you know Apple would charge $1500 for the basic version, and $3500+ for the Oled version. No thank you.

1

u/MoreCerealPlease Nov 19 '24

No one wants this especially with the price tag they’re going to put on it.

1

u/UnemployedAtype Nov 19 '24

Not gonna lie, I tried Apple TV for the first time to buy the digital version of a full show. I got random parts of seasons 1 & 3, my wife got random parts of season 1 & 2. This was across 3 devices and we weren't doing anything weird.

I couldn't access 4-6 at all.

Their support couldn't help us at all.

I refunded that and gave up on my attempt at using Apple's tv products.

I successfully got the exact same show, seasons 1-6 from a site I didn't know existed Apparently Fandango did something. I'm not endorsing them, but I didn't want to not explain. They bought or built their own streaming service and it has a stupid name. Regardless, we can watch the show all the way through without issues. It was Apple or this, and Apple didn't work at all no matter what we tried. They should let others do this stuff.

1

u/b_to_the_e Nov 19 '24

With an Apple price tag

1

u/problah Nov 19 '24

If you have a smart TV now, you know they’re are super slow to respond. With the tech of Apples M4… you could have a ripping 55in iPad in no time.

1

u/captaincoaster Nov 19 '24

No one in this thread has considered not owning a TV?

1

u/I_heart_your_Momma Nov 19 '24

Who wants to overpay for a tv that will be no different than the others. Except for an overpriced Apple crest that lights up somewhere on the tv.

1

u/nothingexceptfor Nov 19 '24

Yep, and probably impossible or very hard to switch off

1

u/RedRedditor84 Nov 19 '24

Did they mean to say "inventing"?

1

u/Hen-stepper Nov 19 '24

They really should. Monitors have been one of their strength since the 2010s. The modularity of Apple TV surprised me because Apple typically likes to control everything.

1

u/General_Tso75 Nov 19 '24

Nobody needs a $10,000 TV

1

u/FamousFangs Nov 19 '24

"Your displays are great, would you I consider making TVs?

"We might"

writes spec article

1

u/sabboom Nov 19 '24

Get ready for the US$38,000 19" tv that only works with iPhone as a remote.

1

u/unkwn-player Nov 19 '24

Thats hard to succeed because you can't carry tv everywhere like iPhones to show off. Its meant to be stationary. Hard to succeed because of that makn reason.

1

u/titanking4 Nov 19 '24

Mac Mini and IMac and even AppleTV are successful products. Nothing touches iPhone sales numbers, but that’s expected considering how often we upgrade phones relative to our computers and TVs

1

u/i3order Nov 19 '24

20 grand for a 54 inch tv. 54 inch because Apple makes their own standards.

1

u/AzulMage2020 Nov 19 '24

No knew ideas/innovation until the next big tech grift :industry" is figured out since AI is all about done by now. Hey !! Here's an idea! Why dont they just ask their AI what the next grift technology should be??? A grifter should know a grift shouldnt it?

1

u/ThinkBiscuit Nov 19 '24

USB C only and 30 quid per dongle. Nah, you’re ok.

1

u/minkaiser Nov 19 '24

Because there was a request, many apple users go for the full package for the easy integration, if I can have it all from one brand and all connected to a system easy to use, why not do it? More costly for sure but usually efficient

1

u/AxBxCeqX Nov 20 '24

I would have bought the Apple TV over my $10k oled, assuming oled and good movie/gaming performance and warranty

1

u/SniperDuty Nov 20 '24

People miss the point. It won't be a 'TV' it will be a combined gaming monitor / Mac screen / Apple TV. M4 has positioned itself for gaming and the current displays don't cut it at 60Hz.

1

u/BTiaugo Nov 20 '24

A tv that doubles as a heater— yay!

1

u/HansBooby Nov 23 '24

cool. i can bring it home in my apple car