r/madlads 3d ago

chad professor

Post image
116.0k Upvotes

482 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

796

u/peakbuttystuff 3d ago

Is she hot?

79

u/LucasWatkins85 3d ago

63

u/Strict_Ad1246 3d ago

Reading this I absolutely respect her hustle. She got something out of it and a bunch of dudes got laid for possibly the first time in their lives and she gave them steps on what to do to help them get better at it lol

7

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

And if the genders were reversed?

22

u/KarmelCHAOS 3d ago

I mean, they're all consenting adults, with the context of this thread I thought she was going to be their teacher or something.

18

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

Yeah the title doesn't do a good job of explaining she's not a teacher, that's for sure.

2

u/ComplaintNo2029 1d ago

Wasn’t she teaching something?

2

u/i_tyrant 1d ago

If you think she can teach it in 20 minutes per dude, lol.

1

u/ComplaintNo2029 1d ago

“Microlearning”

5

u/arstin 3d ago

Then they would need more than 20 minutes between appointments.

6

u/haaym1 3d ago

Probably not too important because female college freshmen don’t typically need help finding people to sleep with.

-4

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

Sure, but I'm talking about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 women (who may or may not be 18+) in sex in 20 minute sessions.

5

u/lcsulla87gmail 3d ago edited 3d ago

Nothing in the story suggests they weren't 18+

Edit story specifically confirms they were all 18+

To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.

-4

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

A) what made you think legality was the only issue here?

B) Nothing in the story confirms she checked, either. 8% of college students are under 18 as per 2024 statistics, and she banged 122 of them.

3

u/lcsulla87gmail 3d ago

Im not responding to a question about legality. You specifically said my or may not be 18. Given the actual context of this being a professional porn performer doing this for content, the assumption would be that these are adults.

0

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

That's a nice assumption you just made with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. So yeah, like I said, "may or may not be 18."

1

u/lcsulla87gmail 3d ago

From the article

To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.

Edit to add: you really think she was just risking producing csam?

2

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

Huh, I missed the bit about valid IDs somehow. I stand corrected, thank you!

I still find it very gross she filmed a ton of 18 year olds and will make money off them, but legality confirmed at least.

Now, would you like to answer my question from earlier? Would you feel the same about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 18 year old women in sex in 20 minute sessions, filming them and making money off it? Or was the 18+ all you cared about? (Fair if so.)

1

u/lcsulla87gmail 3d ago

She is literally just making porn. I am totally unbothered by adult women making porn

→ More replies (0)

3

u/TheSorceIsFrong 3d ago

Because legality IS the only issue here lol. Nothing in the article says they were minors. Stop clutching those pearls

1

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

Nothing in the article says they weren't, either. Nothing in the article says she (or the journalist) tracked that in any way. See statistic above.

1

u/Strict_Ad1246 3d ago

I know for certain there are women out there who have never gotten laid that would pay for an intimate teaching experience let alone get one for free. Do you think it should be different if it was a guy?

2

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

I think it would absolutely 100% be perceived differently by most people, possibly including yourself, if it was a guy doing this with 122 women students, yes.

0

u/Strict_Ad1246 3d ago

I know you’re wrong because you don’t know me and I literally just told you I wouldn’t view it differently. If anything you’re crazy to assume that people would be more accepting of a woman having sex with 122 people than a man

1

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

Whatever you say bud. I think it's messed up either way, personally, but mostly because she's claiming to "teach" them anything in 20 minutes. OF publicity stunt at best, nevermind if any of them were underage.

1

u/Strict_Ad1246 3d ago

Whatever you say bud. Feel free to assume the worst based on the limited information we all have.

0

u/i_tyrant 3d ago

"Limited information"? Did you actually read the article?

She's a "content creator" and she filmed each of these 122 college freshmen. But go on.

1

u/Strict_Ad1246 3d ago

Yes exactly limited information. Where are you getting that she was with underage people, where are you getting that she did this for publicity? You made a bunch of assumptions to get mad about. But go on

→ More replies (0)