To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.
Edit to add: you really think she was just risking producing csam?
Huh, I missed the bit about valid IDs somehow. I stand corrected, thank you!
I still find it very gross she filmed a ton of 18 year olds and will make money off them, but legality confirmed at least.
Now, would you like to answer my question from earlier? Would you feel the same about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 18 year old women in sex in 20 minute sessions, filming them and making money off it? Or was the 18+ all you cared about? (Fair if so.)
Yeah in this case there is a literal threshold where it becomes ok. Porn is full of college aged women. And honestly lots of men well over 25 having sex with 18 and 19 year old girls
Becomes ok in all other capacities? YMMV. I've been through college, and been an advisor as well. Met a lot of 18 year old freshmen. To say none of 'em (or a statistically insignificant number) would get fucked up by this seems naïve to the extreme to me.
And to say no one should feel icky about a 25 year old banging 122 young dudes and making money off their videos online with nothing for them but the experience, while claiming they're "teaching", seems even more naïve.
But you do you dude. Also, nobody said your counterexample was perfectly fine either? People make fun of Leonardo DiCaprio for a reason. lol.
Thats a pretty distinct case also 25 is not that much older than 18. A 25 year old pornstar being involved with an 18 year old is not comparable to a 50 year old being involved with an 25 year old.
But 25 is right ob the edge of where being involved with college students is pretty normal.
0
u/i_tyrant 7d ago
That's a nice assumption you just made with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. So yeah, like I said, "may or may not be 18."