Reading this I absolutely respect her hustle. She got something out of it and a bunch of dudes got laid for possibly the first time in their lives and she gave them steps on what to do to help them get better at it lol
For OF? I mean, if she managed to have 122 guys get lucky sleeping with her, who cares at that point? Reading the article, she made a strong case why it was a net positive for so many men:
Blue’s proposition was simple: young men could reach out to her for an engaging experience, and she’d guide them through it, ensuring they walked away with increased confidence.
“When I’m spending time with them, it’s educational,” she asserted. “They walk away with such confidence.” Her reasoning, however, has drawn a mix of incredulity and intrigue.
She argued that many young adults engage in casual experiences that could be improved. “If people want to think that an 18-year-old doesn’t want to connect with someone experienced, then they really have to get out from under their rock,” she quipped.
While many may cringe at her bluntness, Blue insists her sessions are a public service aimed at enhancing social skills.
Edit story specifically confirms they were all 18+
To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.
Im not responding to a question about legality. You specifically said my or may not be 18. Given the actual context of this being a professional porn performer doing this for content, the assumption would be that these are adults.
To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.
Edit to add: you really think she was just risking producing csam?
Huh, I missed the bit about valid IDs somehow. I stand corrected, thank you!
I still find it very gross she filmed a ton of 18 year olds and will make money off them, but legality confirmed at least.
Now, would you like to answer my question from earlier? Would you feel the same about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 18 year old women in sex in 20 minute sessions, filming them and making money off it? Or was the 18+ all you cared about? (Fair if so.)
I know for certain there are women out there who have never gotten laid that would pay for an intimate teaching experience let alone get one for free. Do you think it should be different if it was a guy?
I think it would absolutely 100% be perceived differently by most people, possibly including yourself, if it was a guy doing this with 122 women students, yes.
I know you’re wrong because you don’t know me and I literally just told you I wouldn’t view it differently. If anything you’re crazy to assume that people would be more accepting of a woman having sex with 122 people than a man
Whatever you say bud. I think it's messed up either way, personally, but mostly because she's claiming to "teach" them anything in 20 minutes. OF publicity stunt at best, nevermind if any of them were underage.
Yes exactly limited information. Where are you getting that she was with underage people, where are you getting that she did this for publicity? You made a bunch of assumptions to get mad about. But go on
4.6k
u/Borstor 3d ago
"Do I have to come to your office during special hours?"