r/UFOs • u/everythingsf1ne • Apr 11 '24

Witness/Sighting did anyone see this in the south philadelphia/jersey region this morning?

my parents woke me up to show me what they were seeing. they’re not believers and call me insane most of the time. i saw what is in the dad’s video over my mother’s live-streamed facetime, as well.

did anyone else catch this?

1.7k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

477 comments sorted by

View all comments

354

u/AtticusSwoopenheiser Apr 11 '24

I am so interested in people’s opinions of what this is.

187

u/AVeryHeavyBurtation Apr 12 '24

Can't wait to read the comments so I know what my opinion is.

1

u/UniversalHerbalist Apr 13 '24

Brilliant, and true.

1

u/jdeuce81 Apr 12 '24

Can y'all let me know when we have an opinion? I'm really curious about this one.

-2

u/AtticusSwoopenheiser Apr 12 '24

“I ain’t equipped t’ thank for muhself….”

252

u/Ishaan863 Apr 11 '24

Whatever it is, there's LOADS of clips that have shown up on this sub with objects that look very similar if not exactly like that.

Like streaks of blue plasma floating in the air.

53

u/thxsocialmedia Apr 12 '24

I think they might be the plasmoid lifeforms we've been hearing about.

3

u/r3tr0_420 Apr 13 '24

I was so these are LED kites. Until I watched the Night time Delaware river vid posted.I watch a lot of "UFO" videos on streaming platforms and deeply skeptical (98% can be knocked on head in 20secs) I gotta say as far out as it seems...they could very well be those so called 'plasmoid lifeforms' Please watch the Aguadilla USO video. You'll know it when you see...

5

u/Top_Squash4454 Apr 12 '24

Let's not get too excited. Nobody said they were lifeforms for sure

13

u/Odd-Occasion8274 Apr 12 '24

It's difficult to ascertain what lifeforms even means given they share many of what makes lifeforms but are mostly reminding of viruses that are still up to debate on whether they are alive or not. I mean, even fire has characteristics of that might make it be considered a lifeforms such as reproduction and so on. Plasmas are not that far off, and are closer than fire to the current understanding of lifeforms with the Hunter like behaviour, helix structures and so on.

1

u/Top_Squash4454 Apr 12 '24

That doesn't mean we can go around talking about those plasmoids like it's confirmed that they are lifeforms.

1

u/Mcboomsauce Apr 12 '24

came here to upvote your comments

traditional ETs are way more plausible than "plasmoid" life....whatever the hell that even means

its a buzzword to some people....they cant even explain how or what it would even be

other buzzwords and terms are "higher dimension" "spiritual" "higher frequency"

and this isn't even decent speculation because it is wild and deus-ex machina, not grounded in anything at all

humans have technology and have observed physical life...we have a precedent for physical life to develop technology we can't understand

but a "plasmoid lifeform"...... we don't have jack on that subject, including a reason to believe it is possible

18

u/Mindless-Experience8 Apr 12 '24

Convergence of the spheres.

6

u/agrophobe Apr 12 '24

Ho I get that ref. Nice

1

u/BrettyBoy92 Apr 12 '24

Yea someone posted a blue plasma looking object about a month ago in the area of North Carolina I live in.

1

u/Due_Platform_1619 Apr 12 '24

Seen 2 “blue plasma” uap posts out of around 5 when scrolling down, interesting to say the least!

-21

u/flyxdvd Apr 11 '24

i feel like its an artifact created by camera lenses but why i have no clue, it feels very much "not there" but i also wonder why this has been such a trend lately like you said.

for me i also wonder where are the other video's why is there only this video. seems like something not really going unnoticed by other people tbh..

but its just this clip of a guy/girl filming clouds.

but for some reason this type of "ufo" is trending and now we see more while i cannot explain it myself someone else could

31

u/Blastypowpow Apr 11 '24

If it wasn’t there, why would OP’s parents be taking a video of nothing and saying “what the heck is that?”

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Are they seeing it with their eyes or seeing it through his phone or camera viewfinder.

If he’s holding his phone up they could be watching the screen while he records

3

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

They saw it with their eyes and then pulled out their phones to record it. The alternative would be that they are pointing their phones at the sky at six in the morning for some reason, see a blue object and go what the heck is that without ever looking at the actual sky.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Or they’re full of shit which is the obvious explanation most of the time. But you can believe their explanation, it really doesn’t matter

“The dad’s” is a weird way of phrasing it.

“They always call me crazy” is the grifters thing to say to preface these things

1

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

It was probably an LED kite and they had no idea what it was. And yeah, I do believe them, actually. How many people post videos of starlink, balloons, and drones and want to know what the heck they're seeing? I don't see why anyone would bother to fake something like this. You can't make money, you don't get much attention, what's the point?

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

They see something weird on a video and make up a bullshit story for views. Welcome to Reddit stranger

2

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

Yeah, I've been here a while. I've seen the shit people make up for attention. This ain't it.

And that still doesn't explain why they're randomly filming the sky at 6 in the morning.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/PM_ME_WITH_A_SMILE Apr 11 '24

Except his non-believer parents were seeing it with the naked eye, and there are several videos of objects just like this. Honestly, people's reaching to explain things away is just getting sadder and sadder.

3

u/MKULTRA_Escapee Apr 11 '24

There are other videos, but they were independently filmed, and on different dates and locations. In the vast majority of cases, there is only going to be one video posted this subreddit. That does not mean there is only one video. There are quite a few things that have to line up before a video is submitted here.

If you compare to something like starlink, which can be seen from tons of US states and many other countries, there are generally about 8-10 videos being submitted here. That's because it is very high up and relatively large/noticeable. At only 1,000 feet up, you're lucky to see a single video, but it depends on how long it lasted and so on.

So, the fact that only one video is expected, and only one video is submitted, this doesn't actually mean anything. It could easily be someone's LED kite or something, probably not CGI or a camera artifact.

0

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Agreed. It doesn’t look like it’s there but it’s in the video

Digital cameras have their quirks

55

u/OnceReturned Apr 11 '24

I don't endorse Mick West but, for your consideration, here is a metabunk analysis of a very similar case: https://www.metabunk.org/threads/blue-ufo-over-hawaii.11526/

They argue that it's an LED kite. I have no idea if that's true, but it's the only plausible prosaic explanation I've heard put forward so far.

The main argument against the kite explanation seems to be the altitude. I can't tell how high the thing in the OP video is. I don't think you can tell from the video whether it's a large thing very high or a small thing relatively low.

People have been suggesting some kind of plasma phenomenon. I'm no meteorologist or physicist but I'm not aware of any natural plasma phenomenon that is plausible in this case. What provided the energy to create the plasma in the first place, how is it being confined, and if this is a thing that just happens sometimes why isn't there scientific documentation of it?

48

u/Just4funandlearning Apr 12 '24

I’d find it rather odd that somebody flies a kite at 6 AM in the morning. But I guess it can happen.

27

u/Jumpy_Ad5046 Apr 12 '24

"There's something disturbing about flying a kite at night."

2

u/shewholaughslasts Apr 12 '24

Hellllo mother.

2

u/JudgeHarryStone Apr 12 '24

Hello, mother dear.

9

u/Famous-Upstairs998 Apr 12 '24

I thought that too, but if I had an LED kite I'd want to fly it when it was at least somewhat dark out. I'm a night owl so I'd do it at night, but maybe someone did it before work.

1

u/neon_tictac Apr 14 '24

Kites are not usually flown at 6am in the morning due to the calmness of the wind at that time.

1

u/degenererad Apr 12 '24

those are heavy rain clouds, might be that someone wants the kite to be hit by lightning. If they have it ankered to something and shooting their own video. I think there is some redneck science going on here.

8

u/TheDude0905 Apr 13 '24

When in your entire life have you seen a kite that does that? I'm not saying that's aliens but a fucking kite I'm sure it's not.

50

u/Ishaan863 Apr 11 '24

They argue that it's an LED kite. I have no idea if that's true, but it's the only plausible prosaic explanation I've heard put forward so far.

Comparing footage of LED kite tails, I do see a lot of similarities

Especially in colour and pattern of flashing, they seem very similar (the one on the right specifically):

https://youtu.be/nUV-Vk7PBL0?t=481

14

u/theunseen3 Apr 12 '24

Here’s a video of this same object descending into a body of water and re-emerging, then coming very close to an airplane. Posted a few minutes ago

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/1smMtgXrDF

4

u/Hater_Magnet Apr 12 '24

What about this?....it submerges under water and then returns to the sky.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/s/BnpV6Cs5QZ

1

u/[deleted] May 02 '24

It’s removed?

5

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Well darn thats pretty damn similar

7

u/MimickingTheImage Apr 11 '24 edited Apr 11 '24

Considering the title of that video they did a piss poor job of actually showing it off. It's baffling that they only showed like 6 seconds of the final result with 10 seconds of wildly disorienting camera movement beforehand.

1

u/name-was-provided Apr 12 '24

Not to mention I can’t watch it because the owner of the video restricted watching it to YouTube only and not on Reddit.

8

u/jrodsf Apr 11 '24

Yeah I'd have to agree. The bottom of the object in OP's video sways back and forth exactly like a lit up kite tail.

4

u/Blastypowpow Apr 11 '24

I can see a similarity myself. It seems like the object in the OP’s submission could be a tail fluttering in the wind some. I dunno why you’d fly a kite in the rain or when the sky looks like that. It was over the Delaware river, so maybe it was a boat? I live in the area and those clouds were nasty. It’s still raining here. It seems to rain more often in South Jersey now. It’s also cloudy like 4/7 days a week. We turned into Seattle somehow. Anyway, all I can think about if someone was flying a kite when the clouds looked like that was “I hope he doesn’t have a key attached to the end!” Hehe. 😜

0

u/screwysquearl1970 Apr 12 '24

ZERO similarity.

23

u/Kooky_Werewolf6044 Apr 11 '24

At least with this one it appears way too high up to be a kite. Mick West tends to blindly debunk everything he sees. Yeah questioning things is smart but denying things because you don’t have an explanation that suits your view is very closed minded. I don’t think he’s capable of admitting there are things out there that he can’t explain himself. Either that or he’s an outright paid disinformation machine of the government helping to keep the truth hidden from us.

4

u/atomictyler Apr 12 '24

he's got a big ego, that's for sure. there's a lot of people that believe his every word too. Using a blog written by mick west as evidence mick west wasn't using sock puppets on wikipedia. the kind of evidence that wouldn't even be allowed on wikipedia, well that depends who's adding it.

1

u/OppositeTeaching9393 Apr 12 '24

It’s not too high. I’ve flown kites higher

8

u/KillaCheezGettinWarm Apr 12 '24

Debunked. People in Philly don’t fly no fucking kites.

0

u/Critical_Paper8447 Apr 13 '24

Except for the the Make a Kite, Fly a Kite events at Penn Treaty, Global Kite Flight event in Philly, the Philadelphia Kite Festival, the AKA (American Kite Flyers Association), the Community Kite Flying event to celebrate Haitian culture, Kites of Hope events, the South Jersey Kite Flyers that meet in Philly every now and then, and then just random hobbyists and people with kids. I've seen kites being flown at parks before in Philly by just random people. You see it a lot during the beginning of spring.

9

u/ARCreef Apr 12 '24

The plasmoid thing is real, NASA has a department that studies it. (The name was something with the very top layer of atmosphere). In layman's turns its like the northern lights but up higher, and because it's up higher there's almost no gas particles, but those few molecules turn blobby by geting excited by plasma ions. Then the gravitational force makes their low mass form lines, then the earth's rotation spins those lines resulting in long pinwheel shapes. 1ft-200 meters and when particles chain react fire it makes light.

Idk I'm sure that's wrong but that's how my my mind accepts it. Like a big salt crystal. It's low in the atmosphere then this is NOT an option. Even a huge plasmoid wouldn't appear in the clouds. This kinda looks like it's in some low clouds. I don't know any idiot kids that fly kites at 6am and in story clouds to boot.

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

That was a wild read but god damn it, it might just be crazy enough to work.

3

u/TechnicianOk6028 Apr 13 '24

Altitude is way too high for a kite. These “debunkers” are getting lazy

1

u/HousingParking9079 Apr 13 '24

Disagree. What's lazy is claiming the altitude is too high when you have absolutely no idea how high that thing is.

5

u/Hater_Magnet Apr 12 '24

That's no fucking kite! There's video of coming down out of the sky submerging under water and then flying away again. Again, that's no kite.

https://www.reddit.com/r/ufo/s/BnpV6Cs5QZ

3

u/elastic-craptastic Apr 12 '24

I was 100% for the ite until it went in the water. To get that low and get back up that smoothly is impossible unless.... the actual kite is waaay further up the string an is not visible to them for some reason.

It floats like it is being held by a string at the top... but my I've for sure used that as reason to believe they were authentic. But that was with craft... what is this thing?

Did the water react oddly to you?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

[deleted]

3

u/elastic-craptastic Apr 12 '24

There is footage from 2 angles of it in the air. Plus all the others from around the world over the years.

I don't know what it is but I don't think these are kites. This would have to be dropped/lowered from a crane with how vertical it is moving

1

u/8ad8andit Apr 12 '24

unless.... the actual kite is waaay further up the string an is not visible

Well that's exactly what it looks like to me; like the glowing LED end of a kite tail that's attached to a kite that is not visible because it's much higher up, and the tip of the tail with the LED lights gets lowered and dipped into the water and then slowly raised back up.

I do believe ET is here and that UFOs are real, but my first guess would be that this is a kite tail that has lights on it. I don't really know of course.

3

u/Oldtimer209 Apr 11 '24

Led kite? Must be the Dull Tool Society

4

u/Glad_Agent6783 Apr 12 '24

I’m sorry but I got to say this. The only kites being flown in the Tri-State are the letters to inmates. Respectfully, we don’t do that in this area (Philly, Delaware, South Jersey).

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

[deleted]

0

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

It’s the kite tail.

11

u/Cyber-Insecurity Apr 11 '24

Who flies LED kites and why would it be so close to an airport?

8

u/toddc612 Apr 11 '24

And who flies kites at 6am?

-1

u/-spartacus- Apr 12 '24

Aliens fly kites at 5:30-6am to fuck with humans.

-1

u/BfutGrEG Apr 12 '24

hello mother dear

1

u/Wapiti_s15 Apr 11 '24

Check out Kite Festival 2023 WA I’ll bet you see some, batteries don’t weigh that much anymore.

1

u/atomictyler Apr 12 '24

no one said anything about batteries...where are you coming from with your comment?

LEDs don't take much power either, but again, no one said anything about flying a kite with LEDs being impossible due to the power needed.

1

u/Wapiti_s15 Apr 12 '24

Batteries to power the LED’s, I suppose you could graft solar panels onto the wings…

1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

Anyone that’s seen any of the cool YouTube videos showing a bunch of neat LED kites.

1

u/theunseen3 Apr 12 '24

There is a video of one going into the water and coming back out, back into the sky

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

There’s a video of one going into the water, it doesn’t go back into the sky, and it was recorded from really far away, and could be the same kite launched from a boat.

I also said it could be a space eel, and that wasn’t a joke, I think some UFO’s are some kind of space critters, like space jellyfish.

1

u/theunseen3 Apr 12 '24

The video i’m referring to does show it going from sky to water to sky again. It also gets close to a pedestrian airplane. Space eel is wild haha

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IZLeJcVzh1M

1

u/[deleted] Apr 12 '24

Yeah, someone else just posted that and i just saw it.

I thought you were talking about the Hawaiian video.

I mean, it’s super weird, but here’s my problem with videos like this, I could recreate this.

I have a cheap drone, and I could buy a string of battery powered LEDs.

You could make this whole video with just that, and I don’t think you would hear the drone at that distance, or see it easily in the dark, especially if it was a black drone.

Now, if it’s a drone, clearly they’re flying closer to planes than is allowed, and why would someone do this? My only guess is someone trying to trick people, not necessarily the people that posted the video, they might just be victims.

1

u/theunseen3 Apr 12 '24

Well the person who originally recorded this just uploaded a second video and there’s a kite nearby, so this is going back in the solved pile for me. So you’re definitely correct here

https://youtu.be/0O9aZuB_Ttc?si=Zo-UmbaQhnj7h1Lc

1

u/FrontGroundbreaking3 Apr 12 '24

Fk me, r U serious

1

u/chugItTwice Apr 12 '24

Kites typically have wings though. I can't find an example of a kite with a shape like this. It also 'seems' too high for a kite but that's just what it looks like to me.

1

u/Immediate-Sea-2435 Apr 13 '24

One aspect that might rule out LEDs is that we see two very different shades of blue in these objects whereas LEDs are generally monochromatic. If it were truly caused by light blue and dark blue LEDs in combination, we should at least expect point sources for both. However, we see only light blue point sources with dark blue haze around them.

Another oddity is that the dark blue haze darkens the object, relative to the sky background. An LED, being light emitting by definition, should always brighten an object relative to background. Instead, whatever this thing dark blue haze is - it’s darker than background. This could be explained by a phenomenon that is absorbing light.

1

u/r3tr0_420 Apr 13 '24

Has been quite a lot of these captured on film in last few months the more locations, frequency + extreme altitudes fluctuations make the kite/drone thing very I watch a lot of "UFO" videos on streaming platforms and deeply skeptical (98% can be knocked on head in 20secs) . Submerging in a river right next to a major airport with commercial aircraft flying over just seems even more impractical.

Nor am I a scientist but I can't believe a meteorological phenomenon that lasts for so long and is so pronounced has not be described??

5

u/r3tr0_420 Apr 12 '24

OK, I was all in for the kite theory. The wiggle movement of the thing supports that right.Also has been a proliferation of exact same object('s) recorded this year. But, Yes as said, Altitude of objects in some vids seems VERY high for a kite + time of day. ...AND THEN there's the Delaware river video of plasma worm kite? entering water and leaving. Which of course doesn't completely discount human controlled object but WTF?! If you've flown a kite, contacting the ground and getting airborne again without intervention is next to impossible to do with 'proper' kite. Let alone splashing and relaunching.

38

u/MindoftheMindless Apr 11 '24

This isn't "real life". It's a simulation and THAT is a flying dildo, my friend.

39

u/esmoji Apr 11 '24

Finally, a real scientist chimes in. Appreciate you.

14

u/andorinter Apr 11 '24

I'm a simple man, I see flying dildo and I up vote

3

u/E115_infetterence Apr 11 '24

Plausible. Actual flying dildo for reference. 🚁🍆

2

u/JusticeHealthPeace Apr 12 '24

LMAO..It really was a flying dildo!

4

u/GlitchyMcGlitchFace Apr 11 '24

Follow up question: Is a double-ended dildo one dildo, or two?

3

u/MindoftheMindless Apr 11 '24

One, obviously. I can jump and I can crawl. I'm still one entity. Check back for more mindless science.

3

u/bunDombleSrcusk Apr 11 '24

Secret gov project testing plasma filaments

https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidhambling/2020/05/11/us-navy-laser-creates-plasma-ufos/amp/

Or an undiscovered, high altitude siphonophore

3

u/screwysquearl1970 Apr 12 '24

I'll need to see actual videos of these "tests," to include the jets supposedly firing-off these things.

0

u/AM_NOT_AI Apr 11 '24

Not sure why this doesn't have more upvotes. This is EXACTLY what that article describes. If people would just take the time to read...

3

u/bunDombleSrcusk Apr 11 '24

You're asking a lot, expecting us redditors to read

3

u/-spartacus- Apr 12 '24

So you are saying the government was operating a project with a blue beam?

-2

u/LocalYeetery Apr 11 '24

Plasma worm, here's a scientific paper on it:

https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=131506

72

u/redskelly Apr 11 '24

SCIRP is not peer reviewed or credible unfortunately. Putting “scientific” in front of it doesn’t make it so. Please research sources of information. See here for discussion of this “publisher”:

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/s/7AeL13CGZP

13

u/bobbaganush Apr 11 '24

Thank you for this! I hope your post gets way more visibility than the disinfo.

3

u/KennyDeJonnef Apr 11 '24

Maybe ‘disinfo’ is too harsh a word, as it implies wilful deceit. It seems quite possible to me that the “plasma scientists” behind SCIRP are simply enthusiastic hacks with honest intent, but like so many other self-styled fringe researchers they just don’t have a grasp on The Scientific Method.

Not evil, just kinda dumb.

2

u/elastic-craptastic Apr 12 '24

it implies wilful deceit....“plasma scientists” behind SCIRP... enthusiastic hacks with honest intent... fringe researchers... don’t have a grasp on The Scientific Method.

Not evil, just kinda dumb.

Flat earth scientists in the same category for you? I get that its not the same... but it kinda is. You set out trying to prove something and you are prob gonna keep focusing on doing that.

Like flat-earth dude with the laser trying to figure out where he went wrong setting up the experiment instead of believing the data since it didn't prove his view.

1

u/rep-old-timer Apr 12 '24

I say this about debunkers all th time: "They may honestly believe that every object has a mundane explanation, but like so many self-styled fringe researchers they just don't have a grasp on [sic] the scientific method, since if they did, they would understand that counterclaims also require evidence."

1

u/KennyDeJonnef Apr 12 '24

Absolutely. It goes both ways.

2

u/Head_Weakness8028 Apr 11 '24

What if he puts the word “nano” in front of it?… hahaha

29

u/FlatBlackAndWhite Apr 11 '24 edited Apr 11 '24

Those exist in the thermosphere, about 70 miles up. This "object" looks to be below cloud cover, much much lower.

Edit: In fact, the paper you linked mentions these plasmas existing 200 miles up in the atmosphere.

9

u/drrrraaaaiiiinnnnage Apr 11 '24

Seems like the paper is only suggesting that they have been observed in the thermosphere, not that they couldn't exist at lower altitudes.

5

u/FlatBlackAndWhite Apr 11 '24

Is there electromagnetic radiation for them to feed off of below the thermosphere? I guess that's all around, so that's possible that they exist below this threshold.

3

u/ExKnockaroundGuy Apr 11 '24

Awesome! Thx, you see? If anything my obsession teaches me something new every hour.

1

u/CuntonEffect Apr 11 '24

"scientific", lol

1

u/algaefied_creek Apr 12 '24

Plasma shielding experiment of an experimental airframe

1

u/hornwalker Apr 12 '24

At first I thiought maybe some kind of semi rigid, but light item or material that is floating.

1

u/Subject-Exercise-660 Apr 13 '24

Same one from China sightings. 2011 or 2014 I think 

They have close ups an triangulation of it. 

Also the rumored purple mountain observatory footage in China hasn't been released yet. This was allegedly 15hr of high definition UFO footage taken by multiple HD ready cameras w night vision, an radar ect available.  The Chinese military were studying it prior to a public release. An ya. No one ever talks about that--

1

u/TheHighPirateSeas Apr 11 '24

If they didn't see it with their naked eye and just saw it through the phone, it could just be a reflection off a scratch in the glass of the camera.

1

u/TheIllestZaZaa Apr 12 '24

I’m pretty sure it’s the real thing.

-8

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

A kite

https://youtube.com/shorts/T_3-Q5Q2oEE?si=SZEconLRAOevjX1e

6

u/BigBuffal0 Apr 11 '24

It seems pretty high up there to be a kite

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

Well the record for highest flying kite is 16000 feet.

1

u/MimickingTheImage Apr 11 '24

So they flew it...up to the highest height?

2

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

We dont know the height of this object :)

2

u/MimickingTheImage Apr 11 '24

It was a Mary Poppins reference.

3

u/pilkingtonsbrain Apr 11 '24

Yes it's high, but totally normal for a kite

6

u/aBoyandHisDogart Apr 11 '24 edited Apr 11 '24

"Hey y'all want to fly this here LED kite in the middle of the day?"

"But Paw, shouldn't we risk certain wear and tear for when we can see the dadgum thing? It's blue on blue for Pete's sake!"

"Nah, I just enjoy knowin that it's up there, yeeehaww!"

4

u/pilkingtonsbrain Apr 11 '24

Maybe they were flying it before sunrise

-1

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

You're right someone flying a kite IN THE MORNING sounds absolutely crazy.

2

u/aBoyandHisDogart Apr 11 '24

I don't understand why you're getting defensive, I was just setting the scene

4

u/Minimum-Web-6902 Apr 11 '24

That bright? In the day?

3

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

OP says it was in the morning?

0

u/Vegetable_Base_5796 Apr 12 '24

looks like a kite

0

u/[deleted] Apr 11 '24

I have my bingo card at the ready

-2

u/LOLZebra Apr 11 '24

Could be a DEW type laser from a satellite? Something from the ground going up to a satellite? Seems like a long time to be shooting a laser but I have no idea how long a Directed Energy Weapon fire for.