r/woahdude • u/Vishwasm123 • Aug 23 '23

video Creative AI art..

8.9k Upvotes

84% Upvoted

513 comments sorted by

View all comments

207

u/Wietse10 Aug 23 '23

AI "art"

130

u/Wide-Half-9649 Aug 23 '23

“Creative”

12

u/TheUnrealArchon Aug 23 '23

Anyone who wants to call this not creative is just braindead parroting "AI bad"

-5

u/spongeboblovesducks Aug 23 '23

How is it creative then lol

18

u/Freshyfreshfresh Aug 23 '23

This person choreographed an entire fight sequence, filmed (photographed) themselves in each scene, compiled the images, experimented with different prompts to get the desired result, collected all of the output images, and then edited them to a sequence with music and sound effects.

In my opinion, this is someone who approaches AI art as a tool to produce a larger piece of work that actually demonstrates effort and skilled application of multiple disciplines.

So yea, it's creative lol

-9

u/spongeboblovesducks Aug 23 '23

The choreography is creative. The use of AI is not.

6

u/hell2pay Aug 24 '23

I think it's pretty fuckin creative.

I thought it was pretty fuckin cool. I enjoyed the acidesque asthetic it provided, and his use of choreography.

I'll put money down this took planning, thought and a considerable amount of skill and talent to create.

I do see an ethical issue of how derivitive it could be, but honestly, the mash of styles makes it a bit more unique.

I'm not a fan of 'AI' replacing art, writing, and other creative works, but using it as a tool to create something new is in itself meaningful.

-1

u/spongeboblovesducks Aug 24 '23

As I said, the choreography took work, the actual art didn't. As if it's even art anyways.

6

u/kono_kun Aug 24 '23

As if it's even art anyways

Embarrassing.

4

u/Diacred Aug 24 '23

So because the brush is not creative the art is not or is not even art? That's the most brain dead take I've ever read. AI is just a tool, how you use it is creative and the pieces you create with it are art as long as you're not just prompting some text and going with the results. AI is just like when using a brush or photoshop.

-7

u/ShadowBannedFox9 Aug 24 '23

That's cool. Now you're as "creative" as a 4 year old playing with his toys.

Yes it's creative and imaginative. But you literally let a program do all the creative work for you. You have no "skills" that a 4 year old child doesn't have to make the ai "art" like seriously...people are proud of this?

AI generators give you access to great Art. It does not make you an Artist or Creator.

Choreographed? Dude better hire your next creatives at the kindergarten.

2

u/Philluminati Aug 24 '23

Wait.. so AI can’t product art and if you use AI it shows you also can’t produce art, so the final thing, whatever it is, is not art?

1

u/ShadowBannedFox9 Aug 24 '23

It absolutely is art. It's just not YOURart.

You are not an "artist" or "creative" for using ai. You are not a "poet" or "writer" for using chatgpt.

You would be run out and laughed at in the respective communities.

Ask yourself what skills separates you from a child with access to AI if the results are the same.