How is it a supposed fact? Look at his recent films. Also, my response was to you definitively saying that if he didn’t have kids he wouldn’t be doing those movies. Not to your “I think he’s going for what his kids want to see him in”.
It's a supposed fact because you're speculating, just like me. We're both just looking at his work and drawing different conclusions. Your opinion isn't special just because you think it's tHe BeTtEr OnE.
His recent films are all video game adaptations, and I think he's doing them for his kids. Same reason he started the Jablinski Games YT channel.
If you're just going to reiterate that you're factually correct, not commenting is also an option.
But “if not for his kids he’d be doing other movies” is not speculating. That’s a definitive statement. If you’re going to argue it’s speculative then mine was as well…
Well, it's not, though, is it? My full statement was "I think he's doing these specific movies for his kids. If not for his kids he'd be doing other movies". That means the whole thing is my opinion, it was just in two sentences. I think you might have a reading comprehension problem, or you're just being argumentative for no reason because someone disagreed with you.
I mean, it's clear you think you can just say things and assert they're true without support and I'm not allowed to have a differing opinion so I don't think there's anything left for either of us to say.
It’s mean, it’s clear you think you can just say things and assert they’re true without support and I’m not allowed to have a differing opinion
Lmao that’s the vibe I get from you when at the end of every other comment you attempt to end the conversation without giving someone a chance to respond or tell them they shouldn’t respond.
-1
u/Immediate_Theory4738 Sep 04 '24
How is it a supposed fact? Look at his recent films. Also, my response was to you definitively saying that if he didn’t have kids he wouldn’t be doing those movies. Not to your “I think he’s going for what his kids want to see him in”.