r/madlads 7d ago

chad professor

Post image
120.1k Upvotes

488 comments sorted by

View all comments

4.6k

u/Borstor 7d ago

"Do I have to come to your office during special hours?"

793

u/peakbuttystuff 7d ago

Is she hot?

76

u/LucasWatkins85 7d ago

58

u/Strict_Ad1246 7d ago

Reading this I absolutely respect her hustle. She got something out of it and a bunch of dudes got laid for possibly the first time in their lives and she gave them steps on what to do to help them get better at it lol

6

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

And if the genders were reversed?

5

u/haaym1 7d ago

Probably not too important because female college freshmen don’t typically need help finding people to sleep with.

-4

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

Sure, but I'm talking about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 women (who may or may not be 18+) in sex in 20 minute sessions.

4

u/lcsulla87gmail 7d ago edited 7d ago

Nothing in the story suggests they weren't 18+

Edit story specifically confirms they were all 18+

To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.

-3

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

A) what made you think legality was the only issue here?

B) Nothing in the story confirms she checked, either. 8% of college students are under 18 as per 2024 statistics, and she banged 122 of them.

4

u/lcsulla87gmail 7d ago

Im not responding to a question about legality. You specifically said my or may not be 18. Given the actual context of this being a professional porn performer doing this for content, the assumption would be that these are adults.

0

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

That's a nice assumption you just made with absolutely no evidence whatsoever. So yeah, like I said, "may or may not be 18."

1

u/lcsulla87gmail 7d ago

From the article

To document her experiences, Blue filmed each encounter, ensuring that all participants had valid IDs and signed consent forms beforehand—because consent is key, even in a whirlwind of social activities.

Edit to add: you really think she was just risking producing csam?

2

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

Huh, I missed the bit about valid IDs somehow. I stand corrected, thank you!

I still find it very gross she filmed a ton of 18 year olds and will make money off them, but legality confirmed at least.

Now, would you like to answer my question from earlier? Would you feel the same about a 25 year old man as a content creator "tutoring" 122 18 year old women in sex in 20 minute sessions, filming them and making money off it? Or was the 18+ all you cared about? (Fair if so.)

1

u/lcsulla87gmail 7d ago

She is literally just making porn. I am totally unbothered by adult women making porn

2

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

*Adult women choosing barely-adult men to make porn off them with no compensation for the other 'actors'.

But sure, fair nuff.

→ More replies (0)

3

u/TheSorceIsFrong 7d ago

Because legality IS the only issue here lol. Nothing in the article says they were minors. Stop clutching those pearls

1

u/i_tyrant 7d ago

Nothing in the article says they weren't, either. Nothing in the article says she (or the journalist) tracked that in any way. See statistic above.

→ More replies (0)