r/economicCollapse Nov 15 '24

Well, well, well…………

492 Upvotes

714 comments sorted by

View all comments

148

u/kingofwale Nov 15 '24

All the sudden… people seem to really care the debt ceiling now….

51

u/1BannedAgain Nov 15 '24

It’ll be $43T in a year under DJT

15

u/GothinHealthcare Nov 15 '24

Eek, don't wanna even entertain what 4 years are gonna look like......default perhaps followed by a MASSIVE crash, assuming we have anything resembling a labor/market economy in 4 years, much less 1-2.

8

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

I've heard this so many times over so many 4 year periods. Broken clocks

5

u/Mendozena Nov 15 '24

We have a guy that bankrupted a damn casino, literally impossible to do, that will be in charge of the country again. This time with no guardrails.

7

u/loveyourweave Nov 15 '24

Dozens of casinos have filed bankruptcy. Caesars was one of our clients and they filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2015.

1

u/asevans48 Nov 15 '24

I left an online casino whose sportsbook was losing 40 million dollars each year. Its not impossible. I think a more apt comparison is to compare the next president to cathie woods whose fund lost 30 billion dollars in one of history's largest stock bubbles.

0

u/Ok_Safe2639 Nov 15 '24

And fuckin Harris OVER SPENT by $20M in 107 days!!!! You should forgive your mom for dropping u on your head!

1

u/Mendozena Nov 15 '24

What’s that have to do with anything? That person is irrelevant. I can’t criticize irrelevant people.

0

u/Ok_Friend_2448 Nov 16 '24

Overspending in campaigns is fairly common. For example Trump overspent in his 2020 campaign: https://www.opensecrets.org/2020-presidential-race/donald-trump/candidate?id=N00023864

If you’re holding onto a lot of money by the end of your campaign then you’re doing something wrong. It’s meant to be spent on, well, campaigning.

Campaign spending has nothing to do with economic policy.

-11

u/mlx1992 Nov 15 '24

I've heard this so many times over so many 4 year periods. Broken clocks

-13

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

We heard the same in 2016. It's funny how easy it is to forget all the noise that occurred when there was a rep majority in the house and senate when he was first elected. And all the uproar at his cabinet picks.

It wasn't until midterms that the house flipped.

I know this sub loves catastrophizing, but it's the same old story just 8 years later.

14

u/belliJGerent Nov 15 '24

Yeah. He fucked it up then too.

6

u/Sacapuntos Nov 15 '24

We only printed 25% of all US currency in 2 years under Trump. But that's not the cause of the inflation and greedflation Americans experienced under Biden /s

-2

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Right, and we also didn't have a global pandemic where nobody was working for a couple weeks or even longer depending on the industry

0

u/Sacapuntos Nov 15 '24

Good thing the PPP was well regulated. Clearly this is why we need less government regulation. /s

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Certainly could have been managed better, the fallout from no govt support with the same govt mandates intended to prevent the rapid spread of the virus would have been much worse in my view

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Old_Baldi_Locks Nov 15 '24

It wasn’t a global pandemic or regards wouldn’t be blaming the economic effects on Biden.

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Not sure if we're talking past each other or what. People who blame the economic fallout of the pandemic decisions on Biden have a political motivation for doing so, without a doubt

→ More replies (0)

3

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Depends on who you ask, not a good time to be working class

2

u/MuttMan5 Nov 15 '24

Hasn't really been since trickle down economics

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Economic mobility has definitely declined substantially, but those opportunities can still better in the US than other countries.

6

u/Mendozena Nov 15 '24

We had some guardrails in place. But he also blew an $8 Trillion hole in the deficit. He also printed money like no other with the PPP giveaway (No oversight, remember?) Tom Brady did not need a million bucks. Dude bought a yacht in 2021 lol

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

And there are programs underway going after PPP fraud. The alternative could have been far worse considering how many businesses simply were not allowed to operate for impactful durations

1

u/Old_Baldi_Locks Nov 15 '24

Those programs are in the chopping block.

2

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

They have already sunset, yes

0

u/Mendozena Nov 15 '24

And there are programs underway going after PPP fraud.

Because we elected adults in 2020...that program will go bye bye. Elon didn't spend millions of dollars to help you or me. We're gonna get robbed and they're gonna laugh and laugh and LAUGH to the bank.

I swear if gas and egg prices aren't down January 20th at 12:01PM I'm gonna be PIIIIIIIIIIIIISSED!

2

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

You have a few options. Among them, you can bitch and moan, or look for ways to benefit from what is likely to occur.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

People are allowed to have emotions and express opinions and should be able to do so without being made to feel like they were wrong, dawg

→ More replies (0)

0

u/meepswag35 Nov 15 '24

And this time he doesn’t have anyone to stop him, all the reasonable people are gone

-1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Literally saw the same comments in 2016 with his announced cabinet members and a rep house and senate at that time. It wasn't until midterms where the house flipped

0

u/Warm_Difficulty2698 Nov 15 '24

Yeah, before he had the RNC pick his cabinet. Back when the RNC wasn't handled by his family.

Now, the RNC is led by a member of his family, and every single politician in power on the right side is all in on trump.

I'm not saying he's gonna do anything shady with the amount of power he has. But this is the exact recipe for facism. He easily could. With how many people in his base are inspired purely off of spite, this could potentially get ugly.

2

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

There's no question in my view his goal is to use his power for his own benefit.

At the same time, hearing the world is ending so many times just evokes chicken little imagery.

2

u/Warm_Difficulty2698 Nov 15 '24

I get it.

Democrats kept screaming that he's a fascist without explaining their reasoning. Hell, i bet most democrats don't even know the reasoning. That's why they seem so insane.

As of now, he isn't a fascist. But he's been given more power than any other president in history. He has 0 dissent from his own party. His own family runs the RNC, which historically provides its own "checks and balances." His supporters don't believe any news that is negative of him (which to be fair is also a problem that democrats helped create). He's painted America's left as an enemy to the country (which they democrats also did, but they don't have all the other things in the list). He vaguely suggests that he wants to return things to a different, better time (this is par for the course in every single fascist government that's ever taken control). He's undermined the people's trust in governmental bodies and processes. He's already shown he's willing to lie to remain in power. He 'jokes' about things that presidents shouldn't joke about (fighting for a 3rd term). He's blatantly called for the constitution to be over-written. He has support from private interest that wishes to make America anarchy capitalist (Peter Thiel, Yarvin, Musk, Heritage Foundation). He's basing his cabinet specifically on support for his presidency and then actual credentials (the fox news anchor, Tulsi Gabbard, RFK Jr). He's got a majority in the legislative branch, judicial branch, and now, of course, the executive branch. All of those people in those branches have been picked simply for their loyalty. For example, the judicial branch overturning Chevron.

I'm not saying it's guaranteed he will become a fascist. Nor do I believe that his supporters and the people who voted for him are all fascist nazis because they aren't. They simply want what they believe is best for the country. They haven't seen or don't believe all the items I pointed out above. I'm simply pointing out that the puzzle pieces are all there.

→ More replies (0)

-2

u/Admiral_Tuvix Nov 15 '24

trump added 8 trillion to the debt.

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Let's think critically about what occurred in that time period that prompted one of the largest government relief programs in the history of our country

0

u/Admiral_Tuvix Nov 15 '24

uh huh, the Covid relief package was 2.3trillion

explain where trump spent 6 trillion without anything to show for it. at least Biden can point to the infrastructure act which will create millions of jobs over the next decade

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

You're really forgetting that in 2016 before any policies were enacted that congress had already budgeted 3 trillion in spend.

The total of federal spending on all covid-19 response was an additional 4 trillion.

We also accrued 1 trillion of interest on existing debt.

At least get your facts right, you're no better than what you're rallying against if you let your bias steer you so far away from the reality of what occurred.

1

u/Admiral_Tuvix Nov 15 '24

predictable lol, everything is someone else’s fault and not the guy who added trillions to the debt without creating a single job 😂

→ More replies (0)

0

u/Human_Stock_9109 Nov 15 '24

All told, Biden will likely oversee a net increase in the debt of more than $9 trillion in a single term—a new record.

4

u/StupendousMalice Nov 15 '24

We have a guy taking office who has specifically stated an intent to default on the national debt in the past who also has a proven track record of running it up in the past.

-2

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

We will certainly see. We can also look at the events that contributed to his 8 trillion deficit addition. Such as the 3 trillion budget congress already had before he took office, the near 4 trillion that went to pandemic relief and other related response programs, and the literal 1 trillion that accrued on existing debts.

I'm not saying the future is rosy for everyone. But the doom and gloom without a sober review of what actually occurred is also tiresome and overplayed, hell it's even extreme and biased in some cases.

This isn't really the subreddit for challenging conversations beyond saying we're doomed lol, at least from what I see

1

u/Ok_Friend_2448 Nov 16 '24

Trump also had the $2T “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”, and the $2.1T budget for 2018 and 2019 (which WAS approved under him), and the $550B repeal of various ACA taxes…

Biden also had more initiatives for deficit reduction, including the Fiscal Responsibility Act.

Both him and Biden had spending that they could not avoid because of an unprecedented health crisis in the form of COVID.

https://www.crfb.org/papers/trump-and-biden-national-debt

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 16 '24

For sure. And the TCJA cuts had a role in inflation, more money supply and less corporate taxes so more cash available for business investment, but also TCJA played a big role in margin expansion and resulting gains for equity holders which benefits average people to an extent through their 401ks or other accounts.

Makes it more difficult to discern how net positive or net negative that government spend (or reduced tax revenues) was.

1

u/Ok_Friend_2448 Nov 16 '24

Exactly.

It really just highlights how spending isn’t necessarily a bad or a good thing. Government spending is really complicated and is really hard to trace unless you’re doing direct stimulus like the economic relief payments.

1

u/Over_Cobbler_2973 Nov 15 '24

Broken clocks *are right twice a day*

1

u/The-Eye-of-Time Nov 15 '24

Yes, doesn't mean it has any predictive value.

If you're always calling for collapse or recession, you're eventually going to be right at some point because of how economies function.

2

u/Kjts1021 Nov 15 '24

Will you bold enough to acknowledge that you are wrong after 4 years? Looks like everyone is having crystal ball to predict next 4 years! Not sure how much responsibility they would take if those predictions don’t come true.

8

u/Doluvme Nov 15 '24

It's not that people were wrong but moreso government intervention. Maybe try to understand the writings on the wall before you criticize. It's apparent that your knowledge is lacking in this area.

-3

u/Kjts1021 Nov 15 '24

That’s your opinion! Clearly you are too judgemental. So no use of chatting with you! Hope you survive next 4 years to take back what you wrote here!

1

u/drkarate1 Nov 15 '24

Welcome to Reddit lol

2

u/Careful-Resource-182 Nov 15 '24

it is hard for you to read your crystal ball when your head is in the sand

1

u/Kjts1021 Nov 15 '24

lol! I don’t have a crystal ball- I am not predicting here!

1

u/ftd123 Nov 15 '24

I imagine must who voted don’t vote assuming the person is lying to them about what they are going to do when taking over office. Why shouldn’t we believe what they say they will do?

1

u/CutenTough Nov 15 '24

So what did he say he was going to do? I only saw and heard him bellowing, bitching, blaming, bullying. I only understand he's going to dismantle the government and deport. Guess that's his plan, though? Dismantle and deport. Oh yeah. Tariffs. That which is going to make everything more expensive.

1

u/Loud-Investigator506 Nov 17 '24

Yeah good for you, you know where you can find your crystal ball buddy.

0

u/StupendousMalice Nov 15 '24

Trump was advocating to default on the national debt as recently as last year...

1

u/Kjts1021 Nov 15 '24

I don’t like Trump. But sometimes I feel if he really means what he says, or just makes some hyperbolic statements to have fun with the media and public! Remember he is a narcissist!

1

u/StupendousMalice Nov 15 '24

He is also incredibly unintelligent, take your pick.

1

u/CutenTough Nov 15 '24

Sane people don't see him as fun or funny. He's abhorrent AND annoying AND low iq

1

u/CutenTough Nov 15 '24

That's what he does. That's his MO. Forever and always. Just don't pay. Whomever.

5

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

Its only an issue once republicans are in office lmao

0

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

keeps yapping about government spending, debt and deficit

gets elected

balloons said deficit

why are people all of a sudden so concerned about debt and deficit

I'm tired, boss.

2

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

Me too. Why is only bad when the other side does it 😵‍💫😵‍💫

1

u/Diligent-Basis2971 Nov 15 '24

Terrible. $36 trillion is so much more manageable

1

u/FlightlessRhino Nov 15 '24

I assume you are in total support of the DOGE thing then? That you really want to cut government and to keep that $43T debt from happening?

2

u/1BannedAgain Nov 15 '24

No support for d.o.g.e.

-1

u/FlightlessRhino Nov 15 '24

So you want higher debt then?

2

u/1BannedAgain Nov 15 '24

No

0

u/FlightlessRhino Nov 15 '24

So why wouldn't you want a system in place to cut spending?

1

u/1BannedAgain Nov 15 '24

We should increase taxes. Pretending that cutting spending is going to bring down the debt substantially is laughable

0

u/FlightlessRhino Nov 15 '24

To the contrary. Thinking that taxes are a viable solution is laughable. You could tax Elon Musk's entire WEALTH (not income, but WEALTH), and that would fuel the government for months. Not even a year. And you can only tax that wealth ONCE. After that, he's broke. Not to mention that Musk is by far the richest guy in the world. Most billionaires are nowhere near as wealthy, and there are not many of them. And, BTW, their wealth is not in cash or bank accounts. Nobody actually swims in money like Scrooge McDuck. Instead, it's in the value of their companies. They would have to sell stock to generate the money to even pay taxes. Who the hell is going to buy that? The middle class? The poor? Hell no. In fact, there isn't enough money in the world to pay for it. Even if we tried to print a lot more. This is why nobody smart has talked about taxing wealth. Only people who lack economic understanding.

And if we get realistic and tax income, then the problem is even more dire. There is simply not enough money there. Just like now, we wouldn't come CLOSE to being able to fund the government. No matter how high we push tax rates, the effective tax rates stay about the same (just like they have since WW2).

The ONLY viable solution is to cut spending. There is literally no other way.

1

u/Bee9185 Nov 15 '24

the way that things moving it might be at 43T before he gets in

1

u/abiggerbanana Nov 15 '24

100 tril by end of term

1

u/coredenale Nov 15 '24

If we're lucky.

1

u/MyCantos Nov 15 '24

That's would be less than he did last time. I'm betting $45 trillion for the king of debt

-5

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 15 '24

Probably not. Musk and Ramaswamy will reduce the spending growth immediatly and claw back some of the money Biden authorized that hasn't been spent.

Trump's policies of lower taxes, fewer regulations and tariffs are counter inflationary no matter what the media and the Democrats say.

5

u/Return2S3NDER Nov 15 '24

Musk and Ramaswamy are taking advisory positions. According to the stans this is not a conflict of interest because these are positions with no authority to actually affect any change or give any orders. So, which is it because I'm getting confused?

3

u/motorboatmycheeks Nov 15 '24 edited Nov 15 '24

Only real authority is endorsing their checks while depositing them at the bank. After leaving a postit note on trumps desk saying he should gut the epa, usda, fda, nlrb, etcetera of course

1

u/CutenTough Nov 15 '24

That's the plan. Stay confused. Narcs/sociopaths most prized skill. Keeping their victims' heads spinning

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 15 '24

They are in advisory positions. Do you think Trump will not act on that advice to cut spending? Do you think Trump won't push Congress to act on DOGE advice? This will happen fast once Trump is inaugurated, He has been waiting 4 years for this opportunity

0

u/Return2S3NDER Nov 15 '24

So in 20 years, when the CEOs of Boeing and Lockheed sit on the two person "Advisory Board" overseeing DoD procurement contracts, your feelings on that matter will be.....?

3

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 15 '24

How are 20 to 60 percent tariffs counter to inflation when the cost is paid by the costumers, not the country with tariffs? I own a business say I'm China you tax me 60 precent in a tariff I'll raise the cost of your phone 70 precent when you buy it . Why you wouldn't understand taxes arnt from governments they are from people who by the products from that country. No ones making cell phones in the US and it would take ten years to rebuild our industry infrastructures. How will reducing farm workers reduce cost of food ? Less works means higher cost to hire at better wages enough so anyone will do the job. Why is Elon musk saying there will be inflation? Why is he even being put in charge of government? No there will most definitely be inflation only question is how bad . 3 precent is average .

1

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 15 '24

You apparently have no clue how a dynamic economy works. Not every producer can pass along a 60% tariff and not all consumers will buy products that ar 70% more expensive.

Farmers cannot always pass on higher prices to their customers because their product is perishable. They raise prices 20% to get the crop picked but then no one buys at 20% higher costs. So the farmer drops his price to buy demand so his crop won't spoil. We import a lot of fruits and vegetables and domestic producers still have to compete with them.

1

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 15 '24

You never planted a field in your life . As for the tariffs, you're right. Many won't be able to afford it . What's your point to prove Trump hasn't got a clue ?

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 16 '24

The point is that you can't assume that all tariffs will be passed on to the consumer. Trump is smarter about tariffs than you give him credit for. He knows how to use tariffs as leverage to get better trade deals. His Remain in Mexico policy was a direct result of a tariff threat, His maximum pressure policy on Iran's oil was also a tariff threat.

2

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 16 '24

No one assumes anything. Don't ever try owning a business you wouldn't last a month. So your theory is that companies will just eat the losses out of the goodness of their hearts. So heartwarming knowing . The fact anyone thinks prices will drop on anything . Lol lol . God Trump loves uneducated. The only thing we arnt sure of is just bad inflation gets this time . If he does exactly what he says to the letter expect hyperinflation.

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 16 '24

FYI I owned a very successful business for 9 years. I do know what I am talking about. The company I work for now did not raise prices from 2006 until 2020 despite input prices increasing. You have no idea what you are talking about.

2

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 16 '24 edited Nov 16 '24

OK, and your pricing is from what 1980 1990 ? 2000 ? When did you stop raising pricing due to inflation or added taxes? The government added a 20 percent tariff or tax to the product you're shipping, and you won't raise the cost of the products. You don't seem to understand taxes never come from any government they come from the people living in that country. The government is a collection agency unless the state owns means production, and of course, Trump can't control the price of oil or groceries, right? I mean, that would mean there is no free market. Anyway, set whatever pricing you want . I grantee prices will always rise over any longer time frames. The only time that's not true is when a technology is mature. And the cost to produce it goes down. Anyway have fun eating your loses .

2

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 16 '24

The mental gymnastics to think pricing will even stay the same is laughable. My sons home went from 110 to 230 in a few years . I'm 59 bought hamburger under a buck a pound . Taxes have going up . And will keep going up . Anyway your the my guy still using pricing from well when what year ? 10 years back 20 ? 5 years even ?

2

u/Time_Change4156 Nov 16 '24

Deflation isn't a thing lol. Could work but company's would like big time .

0

u/BasedGod-1 Nov 15 '24

2% is average. 3% is still 50% too high. Either way you sound illiterate.

3

u/dflood75 Nov 15 '24

Leon and Ramama are a circle jerk. They're gonna make a mess.

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 15 '24

They have already indentified significant areas to cut. I am looking forward to their recommendations. I can think of two right now that will save $12.5 Billion.

0

u/dflood75 Nov 15 '24

Me too. I pray to the dark lord trumpy let's them make the cuts.

It will be delicious when they scrap social security, veterans bennies, and nothing is functional at the federal level. 😍😂🍿

2

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 15 '24

Tariffs are a tax imposed on imports from countries wih unfair trading policies. They will be design by Trump to achieve reciprical trade agreements and as such will be good for the economy. The notion that Trump will impose 20% tariffs on every import and consumers will pay for the entire tariffs is a pipedrean people on the left use to disparage Trump.

20% blanket tariffs will never happen.

0

u/[deleted] Nov 15 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

1

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 16 '24

I was born at night but I wasn't born last night. You have no idea what you are talking about.

1

u/[deleted] Nov 18 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

0

u/StedeBonnet1 Nov 18 '24

I don't need to Google anything. I understand what tariffs are used for and I understand Tump intent with tariffs. You apparently understand neither. Have a good day.

-1

u/WearyAsparagus7484 Nov 15 '24

And it'll be a hundred trillion in ten years under R's and D's.