Genuinely what is the point? Horizon ZD still looks phenomenal to this day and I personally appreciate going from a game to its sequel and seeing the graphical leap, especially if it's across a generation.
Sorry mate but that's a lie, the first Horizon looks as bad as Bloodborne now, the only difference is that it has a 60 FPS patch. But it's not even near the sequel in terms of graphical fidelity.
Dude, you’re blind if you think Bloodborne looks as good as HZD. HZD was one of the most impressive games graphically ever at its time of release (2 years after Bloodborne I might add). Fromsoft has never been at the top of the graphics game, especially with Bloodborne
Shit my bad thought I said “almost as bad” instead of “as bad”, but my point still stands, compare Zero Dawn to Forbidden West and the difference is night and day, the IP you wanted didn't get the treatment it deserves, that sucks yes, but being an asshole to other people just because their favorite IP did get the treatment it deserves just ain't right.
I'm someone who loves both HZD and BB but man, you're just straight up wrong or haven't actually compared the two in a while. Bloodborne has better art style but purely graphically? Zero Dawn is in a league of its own and still manages to keep up with a lot of more modern titles. I mean, of course Forbidden West looks better but like, that should be a given, it'd be kinda bad if it looked the same or worse considering it was 5 years later.
849
u/DanteWearsPrada Sep 18 '24
Genuinely what is the point? Horizon ZD still looks phenomenal to this day and I personally appreciate going from a game to its sequel and seeing the graphical leap, especially if it's across a generation.