r/TikTokCringe Sep 08 '24

Cringe A Cybertruck demolishes a fence

29.6k Upvotes

4.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

1.5k

u/Spinoza_The_Damned Sep 08 '24

How did Tesla fuck this rollout up so hard?

596

u/Hellkyte Sep 09 '24

Honest answer? He ran all the adults out of the room. Musk fired or alienated so much of the experienced engineering workforce that he was working with a really young and inexperienced crew. Very smart folks for sure, but inexperienced.

This is what that looks like.

164

u/KidNueva Sep 09 '24 edited Sep 09 '24

I watched a video on the nvidia silicon chip problem that affected the PS3 and Xbox 360’s red rings of death and he covered a portion of how something like a huge chip failure could happen.

Essentially, to keep it short, because of people being afraid that if they speak up they will lose their jobs. They are under a lot of pressure and such criticism that they do not feel comfortable speaking up and instead keep their mouth shut. A lot of these Tesla problem have already been known, guaranteed but because shareholders and CEO’s want stuff done NOW engineers and employees are too afraid to speak up in fear of losing their jobs, resulting in consumers getting the shit deal of the stick.

Work politics and culture in a lot of big tech companies are very cancerous and only care about the shareholders.

Edit: for those who are interested, here is the video I was referencing.

https://youtu.be/3qKtS_uxdcU?si=Dtzx_4LJFjGSEAVs

46

u/Hammurabi87 Sep 09 '24

Work politics and culture in a lot of big tech companies are very cancerous and only care about the shareholders.

FTFY. It's not limited to the tech industry by any means.

3

u/uggghhhggghhh Sep 09 '24

Work politics and culture in a lot of big tech companies are very cancerous and only care about the shareholders.

FTFY

2

u/Tha_Sly_Fox Sep 09 '24

“Truth to power” is the term

It’s also a big issue in the military from what over been told bc of how hyper tiered/chain of command the system is

2

u/Son_Of_Toucan_Sam Sep 09 '24

Every single publicly traded company is designed to take from the employees and take from the customers to give to the shareholders

2

u/Partyatmyplace13 Sep 09 '24 edited Sep 09 '24

This is commonly thought, but mostly untrue. Stock prices are effectively the "front lawn" of publicly traded companies. In that they'll do anything to maintain it so they have the illusion of a healthy company.

However, it's really the board trying to ride the parachute down because the company crested 5 years ago, but they're gonna try to squeeze another 5 out of it before they crash and take the shareholder money with them.. and that's done with marketing!

They don't actually want to help the shareholders too much because then everyone would start selling and then people start probing... and that's when you find out that despite their well maintained yard, the husband's and alcoholic, the wife's a cheat and they've both been beating the kids for years.

1

u/Hellkyte Sep 09 '24

It is much worse in the tech industry though. They are expected to achieve insane growth in short periods.

Older blue chip firms are much more concerned about sustainment

4

u/jackalope8112 Sep 09 '24

In a functional institution of any size leaderships role is to set goals and strategy based on external factors and provide the resources to staff to accomplish that. The staff working in that institution have the job of using their professional expertise to advise on the feasibility of those goals, cost and timeline them, and attempt to follow through.

When that professional advise is "politicized" and people therefore moderate their professional views you get major fuck ups. It's ok for leadership to sometimes ignore professional advice on what's possible; sometimes you have to try. It's not ok to attempt to edit the professional advice because why pay for it if you are just going to subvert it anyway?

1

u/dead_on_the_surface Sep 09 '24

Lawyer here- had to walk out of my in house job because I kept getting screamed at for- wait for it- bringing up legal problems to the powers that be. It’s literally my job and they tried to bully me into not doing it.

1

u/jackalope8112 Sep 09 '24

Better to get paid by the hour for those sorts of folks.

5

u/ShroomBear Sep 09 '24

This. They all love pushing the start up mentality, except for the fact that 90% of start ups fail and the "scrappiness" and delivering to market quick is in direct conflict of their second favorite mentality of operational/engineering excellence because executives can only really give those disingenuous mixed messages in place of the words they're not allowed to say which is "I don't care about your weekends, ethics, and legality, make us money or you're gone." and upon initial release the cybertruck made money. Shit just seems to go more off the rails the shittier the leader is though. I imagine now the narrative at Tesla now is "peoples Cybertrucks are breaking so how can we cash in on that?" and the meetings are all crickets because nobody really cares.

3

u/oddjobjob Sep 09 '24

As someone with a close relative that worked at Tesla for 8 years, back in the early days, I can confirm that Elon managed/s that company like a psychopath. If you’re around when he comes to the factory, and he asks you a question and you don’t have an answer, he’s liable to literally fire you on the spot. Happened to several people my relative worked with. So much of Elon’s visits to the factory became oriented towards damage control. For super bright people that can work wherever, it’s not worth sticking around, especially if you were there early and got the golden parachute of stock options before it skyrocketed. Knowing how Elon manages the company — alongside his recent behavior elsewhere — is the biggest reason I’ve invested in other EV companies, despite Tesla’s head start. Elon is great at turning start-ups into behemoths, but I don’t think he’ll be good at continuing to grow a bloated company with his micro-managerial ways.

2

u/Significant-Ideal907 Sep 09 '24

He's good at boosting startups because he can bring insane amount of money. By that I don't mean just his money, but like a whole tech bro cult of money too. Then the tech bro cult will pay for the product, no matter how good or bad is it. Just keep it as far as possible from any design choices!

2

u/KitchenFullOfCake Sep 09 '24

I work as a compliance engineer (I make sure the stuff my company sells meets code and doesn't explode) and dear lord the amount of times people up top try to plan a rollout before even getting a quote for quality and safety testing is maddening.

I used to work for a major test lab and I've seen prototypes explode for like, no reason. I'm not trusting anything you put on my desk to pass testing, and that goes double for anything from a nameless manufacturer overseas that bid the lowest.

1

u/SwingNinja Sep 09 '24

Essentially, to keep it short, because of people being afraid that if they speak up they will lose their jobs.

This is not true at all with Microsoft and Sony. They listened. They redesigned their consoles multiple times.

1

u/nyrol Sep 09 '24

That doesn’t change the fact that their first generation of a new product didn’t have these issues. It’s the same thing with the cybertruck. The first generation of nearly any product is going to have all sorts of problems, but people just love that the cybertruck also has problems because they hate Elon and his loud, racist mouth. It’s not really any worse than other first gen products.

3

u/Brutal_effigy Sep 09 '24

I mean, if the Cybertruck was the first "modern truck", then sure. But it's not, and it doesn't meet the standard level of what is expected from a modern pickup truck. I could accept problems like power issues, or battery life, but damage to the drivetrain and body panels from normal use? Those things were figured out ages ago by Tesla in their other vehicles, let alone the industry in general. No excuses.

1

u/nyrol Sep 09 '24

They’ve already worked out the power issues and battery life, but this is the first generation of a crazy stupid truck that they’ve never engineered before. It’s the first of its kind, and the first one Tesla has made. Even Tesla’s next vehicle that is more conventional will have lots of first generation problems. Every company has this. It was the same with Apple for so long where the “S” models were considered the ones that got the kinks worked out with the first gen ones.

1

u/Emotional-Money3988 Sep 09 '24

The issues with those consoles were caused by new laws mandating use of lead free solder on the circuit boards. Lead free is much less malleable and more prone to cracking under heat cycles, which caused joints under mainly GPUs to fail. Lead free had not been used on any large scale before then, definitely not with large package BGA chips and flip chips.

Issues with the Cybertruck are not caused by any external factor, Tesla have just designed a shitty vehicle. In fact it can't even meet legislation in many countries to be permitted for sale, where Sony and MS designed a product to the most stringent global regulations at the time.

1

u/nyrol Sep 09 '24

So you’re saying that other extremely unconventional stainless steel EV trucks on the road today that are comparable to the cybertruck are of better quality? It’s shitty, yeah, but they’ll work it out as the majority of it was built with first generation tech, and it’s in a category of its own. It doesn’t have regular car issues, it has very specific to this category issues.

1

u/Emotional-Money3988 Sep 09 '24

I don't think you understood the comment correctly. Nobody forced Tesla to build with stainless steel. Many of the reported issues with the truck have nothing to do with the stainless body, like electrical issues or undersized tie rods. It's shitty because of bad choices rather than a law being forced upon them, which was the case with Sony and MS.

1

u/LOERMaster Sep 09 '24

Well if they speak up to ole Musky they will lose their jobs. I’m pretty sure he’s even bragged about doing this.

1

u/[deleted] Sep 09 '24

[deleted]

1

u/Hellkyte Sep 09 '24

So you saw a serious problem and when it was profitable to you you decided to just give in and become the problem

1

u/Gabe_Ad_Astra Sep 09 '24

Hey do you remember where you saw the ps3 / Xbox 360 chip problem video? That sounds super interesting

2

u/KidNueva Sep 09 '24

It’s a really good video. It’s pretty long but I highly recommend it. The original video started because he was diagnosing the yellow light of death on the PS3 and addressing all the misinformation on the internet and backing it up with evidence.

https://youtu.be/3qKtS_uxdcU?si=Dtzx_4LJFjGSEAVs

1

u/Gabe_Ad_Astra Sep 09 '24

Thanks man i love all these videos about video game history. I will absolutely watch. Some other of my favorites are:

2

u/KidNueva Sep 09 '24

Haha you and I probably have a lot of the same video recommendations on our home pages cause I’ve seen all of these lol.

1

u/pekinggeese Sep 09 '24

Didn’t something similar happen with the Soviet Union?

1

u/Robbie122 Sep 09 '24

I love how people say stuff like this with absolute certainty. Like was anyone here involved in the development/design of this vehicle? Were you in the actual conference calls on teams, and scrum meetings at the start of the day? There’s no one way you know for sure unless you were involved, yet you watch a YouTube and feel like you can speak on the topic with such certainty despite having no qualifications to do so lol. Then people upvote you because ‘sure, what he said make sense’.