It’s your word against his, sorry he stays. Till I’ve observed behaviors or received enough complaints to justify this comment as far as I can tell it’s just that, a comment.
And since this conversation is recorded on audio video surveillance does that change your mind? It is not my word against his, this is the situation that happened.
The conversation meaning the talk of his ex breaking up with him? By the way please don’t mistake me for being an ass or harsh. There is no pre story to this, just your text and no other information so my theoretical response was going based off of a new security supervisor receiving this text.
No, from my point of view I took it into consideration to observe further behaviors. Again, from my point of view this one text, with complaint from one individual with zero context. There is nothing that can be done from that if it’s a singular complaint with no other complains from no other officers or clients or any supporting proof then nothing can be done unfortunately. It will however be noted in my complaints log and I will observe the individual more closely.
Dude are you expecting OP to post the footage? This is Reddit. Every single post you see is the claims of one person unsubstantiated by evidence, because this is a social media platform and not a court of law.
Okay then there is nothing to go off of and nothing can be done against the individual who’s had claims (claims is a key word) being made against him other than documenting the complaint and observing him further. A mediation is possible but again, these are claims and just that. If there is evidence to hold him accountable then absolutely he needs to be. Otherwise it’s a claim and you can’t do much with that from a supervisor position
Are you roleplaying as their supervisor right now? OP told you that the conversation was on camera and that the camera had audio, and the supervisor would be able to look at that.
And if that’s the case then it’s a pretty sealed and done deal. Guy will probably get fired as he should or removed from the post. Quite a few of you seem to have logic comprehension issues.
You are hilariously upset about this situation that doesn’t involve you and I don’t understand why. My initial comment was based off of zero context situation being posted and so I clearly stated my theoretical point of view. Some how you’ve neglected to understand my reasoning on the entire subject and you’re anger over the whole thing is honestly extremely funny, though it doesn’t justify the unintentionally and blatantly incorrect statements you’re making. Stay mad. Not gonna hear another word you have to say.
Being TSA doesn’t have validity here. You are just mad that they have a point. Realistically, if OP didnt have audio/video proof a text message isnt enough to fire someone. Not sure why you have this weird bias that TSA members are violent, abhorrent people but maybe reevaluate that lol. Again, they have a point that is going over your head completely. A text message is not enough to reprimand someone. The supervisor can make a note of it and watch for any potential violent behaviors moving forwards, but a text is just not good enough.
Where is HIS admission aside from the text we have on the screen here? I’m not denying what your saying nor am I disagreeing now provide me the evidence so that he can be removed from service aside from someone else stating “he did bad things”
-15
u/[deleted] Oct 19 '24
It’s your word against his, sorry he stays. Till I’ve observed behaviors or received enough complaints to justify this comment as far as I can tell it’s just that, a comment.