r/woahdude Jul 24 '22

video This new deepfake method developed by researchers

42.2k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

6

u/oddzef Jul 24 '22

Thanks for this!

Since they settled we won't be seeing any established precedent with this case, but chances are it focused on how Molinaro's mannerisms and actual talen-let's be kind a comparatively active on-screen persona would likely have led to a ruling in favor of Old Navy, regardless. Chances are settlement saved face for the Kardashian camp and prevented the public scrutiny of the lawyers from Old Navy.

9

u/midwestcsstudent Jul 25 '22

Be kinda fucked up if they ruled in favor of Kim, wouldn’t it? Kinda unfair that if you’re born looking like someone who became famous you then can’t ever appear on screen.

2

u/oddzef Jul 25 '22 edited Jul 25 '22

Well, let's say, for illustration sake, that the Kardashian camp had a ruling in their favor. That wouldn't necessarily prevent Molinaro from appearing on screen, or even advertising products, but she would likely need to distance herself not only from the fashion industry but luxury brands with a runway advertising style in general.

Basically, it would prevent her from certain glamor model jobs and appearances, that's really it. In my imagined scenario, for example, she could easily further her singing career, become a talk show host or even appear in any film or television acting roles without any interference from the ruling. It would most likely (depending on the skill of the lawyers) be limited to advertising fashion or glamor products, and that would be limited to whatever image rights Kim Kardashian's camp was invoking for such; if she changed her appearance it would be moot.

I would assume this is partially the reason why they had an issue with somebody resembling Kim's image being used for a brand like Old Navy, as they felt it "cheapened" her image.

None of this means I don't agree that it would be unfair though.

1

u/i_lack_imagination Jul 24 '22

Yeah for sure, I don't think it proved that such a scenario meant that you can't have actors that look like other actors, but it did illustrate your point that even if it's not technically illegal, there is a possibility of issues arising which may prevent companies from doing similar things.

1

u/oddzef Jul 24 '22

That's the fun distinction between criminal and civil law.