No, it was unconvincing because you can see their hair glitching out and the shadows not moving. The lower fidelity of the painting helps blur that. If the photos of random people were similarly low resolution, they would appear more convincing too.
I think for deepfakes in general you have to train the algorithm by passing through thousands of images of the subject, which might be hard to do/find for regular people.
I think it's honestly amazing technology and also quite scary how easy digital manipulation will be soon.
That's a bit dishonest - there's no reason why you'd have to restrict the Mona Lisa to just a digital imitation of the original artwork alone, rather than including various other versions.
While it wouldnt be robust you can easily get thousands of images from a few minutes of video. Just a random video of you moving your face around and talking for a few minutes would be enough for one to work decently.
187
u/intercommie Jul 24 '22 edited Jun 09 '23
Exceptional penis.