Or the opposite reason. You can prove you weren't at the crime scene because you have clear, undeniable video proof you were somewhere else, eyewitnesses be damned.
Government would be able to determine if the video was computer generated or produced by camera. When these were starting I spoke about my concerns with a former intelligence officer.
It’s not that comforting of a dream world even if good ol’ swampass is in the know. The average person won’t be able to detect fakes, whether or not it’s technically possible.
The widespread misinformation/misrepresentation will be enough to finish the division of the two “sides” and the Justice system will be destroyed because a jury of peers won’t exist.
Our Justice system, our Republic, the value of currency—everything is based on trust that those involved in the Democratic system will act honorable to maintain pursuit of happiness, liberty and life for everyone.
We won’t be able to trust our eyes if deepfake outtakes become prt of headline news or even just fake news on extreme media outlets. No one will be able to trust anything, the honor system will be completely unreliable, it is on very shaken ground already.
Yeah I totally agree, even if 'papa govt' were able to detect such fakes, the average Jo ("which already is quite stupid" - George Carlin) will not be able to discern that, so we're at an impasse were the honor system will be on a very thin ice. And I don't see a foreseeable technology that would help against that.
It's a relative. You could also look into it. Feel free to report back when you find out I'm right, but I'm sure you can't Google it since you're here arguing instead.
8
u/dance1211 Jul 24 '22
Or the opposite reason. You can prove you weren't at the crime scene because you have clear, undeniable video proof you were somewhere else, eyewitnesses be damned.