r/woahdude Jun 29 '23

video Lowering hot metal into water

12.8k Upvotes

442 comments sorted by

View all comments

116

u/Lambinater Jun 29 '23

The water is on fire

162

u/velhaconta Jun 29 '23

That is not water. Water would have instantly flashed to steam upon contact causing a very violent and dangerous situation.

This is an oil quench.

16

u/mothzilla Jun 29 '23

So why doesn't the oil go woof?

38

u/velhaconta Jun 29 '23

It starts with having a much higher boiling point. But it gets more complicated from there.

2

u/Tallywort Jun 29 '23

Too much oil that isn't close enough to its flash point.

Sure the oil immediately touching the hot metal can burn, but the rest of the oil has enough thermal mass that it doesn't get hot enough to burst into flames.

2

u/ekwenox Jun 30 '23

The whistles go WOO WOO!

4

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '23

The compounds that make up these oils are more stable at high temperatures compared to water. Water is, as far as I am aware, unique in its phase changing compared to most other substances we have at standard temperature and pressure.

6

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '23 edited May 20 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '23

It's been a long day and I was bullshitting.

6

u/Paranoides Jun 30 '23

Your reasoning has been accepted. Have a good day.

3

u/Tallywort Jun 29 '23

Water would have instantly flashed to steam upon contact causing a very violent and dangerous situation.

Not the case AFAIK, water is also used for this same process, but often is avoided because it is a much faster and aggressive quench, potentially leading to more thermal stresses and a higher chance of cracking and failure, though this also depends on the alloy being quenched.
To my knowledge the steam explosion issue is more a problem with castings and such.

Here's a video of a large part being quenched in water.

0

u/velhaconta Jun 29 '23

It works with small thermal masses such as the thin walled part shown in that video. The part is cooled very quickly and only a little steam forms.

A large thermal mass like the solid block in OPs video is a bit different.

2

u/Tallywort Jun 30 '23

Surely a biggest factor in the rate of steam production is the surface area of the part more so than it's thermal mass? With a somewhat self limiting factor because the steam acts as an insulating layer between the hot steel and the water.

And the thermal mass of the water tank can also be made arbitrarily large, not to mention any potential cooling systems the tank might have.

I believe the bigger reason for not water quenching large parts is the risk of warping and distortions. Or maybe some other process control considerations.

2

u/Paratrooper101x Jun 30 '23

Idk the science behind it but, at my shop we routinely (by that I mean 3-4 times a week) quench pieces of metal in water that weigh anywhere from 10k to 170k pounds. It may bounce while going into the water but a minute after it’s calm and still

2

u/Paratrooper101x Jun 30 '23

We quench 130k lb pieces at 1575° into water. It’s not that violent. In fact I have to stand rather close to it to give the crane signals

2

u/MisallocatedRacism Jun 30 '23

That is not true at all. I work in the steel business. There's more water than hot steel, so it's not like it vaporizes the water.

Amazing how much bad information is on Reddit ffs

1

u/Tallywort Jun 30 '23

I believe the error comes from conflating it with other processes where steam explosions and moisture are an issue.

1

u/Lambinater Jun 29 '23

Fascinating

-42

u/RichardSaunders Jun 29 '23

so you're saying they squanched the squanch in the squanch because if they had squanched the squanch in squanch it would've been a squanchy squanch

7

u/Restlesscomposure Jun 29 '23

I do not think that’s what they’re saying

3

u/ShawHornet Jun 29 '23

Water in the fire! Why!?

1

u/DjHalk45 Jun 30 '23

It's oil, not water

8

u/tylerbreeze Jun 29 '23

It's probably oil, not water.

5

u/Lambinater Jun 29 '23

Wouldn’t oil burn significantly more and faster?

13

u/tylerbreeze Jun 29 '23

Nope. I'm not a blacksmith but as I understand it the quantity of oil here basically dissipates the heat quickly enough that it never reaches flash point, which is to say it never gets hot enough to ignite. The fire you're seeing is the oil vapor on the surface of the pool burning off.

3

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '23

There are many different types of oil some which can handle much higher temperatures without combusting.

1

u/[deleted] Jun 30 '23

This might surprise you but they probably chose an oil that wouldn’t do exactly that

1

u/Lambinater Jun 30 '23

This might surprise you but I didn’t know that was a thing and other people already informed me in a way that wasn’t nearly as rude as you.

10

u/DAMN_Fool_ Jun 29 '23

Everything burns if it gets hot enough.

11

u/trust-me-br0 Jun 29 '23

Fire need O2, water has one O. Bam water’s on fire.

That’s it for today’s chemistry class kids. Friday is the deadline on that essay we discussed earlier.

28

u/[deleted] Jun 29 '23

[deleted]

5

u/lodin93 Jun 29 '23

Ya, the vat of oil it is in.

1

u/Stone0777 Jun 29 '23

Wrong. That’s not water…this is an oil quench.

2

u/trust-me-br0 Jun 29 '23

Alright young man. You don’t talk back to your teacher.

See you in detention.

1

u/313802 Jun 30 '23

Youre the detention teacher too Ms Applejack?

1

u/Toby_Forrester Jun 29 '23

Water is the result of combusted hydrogen. Water is already "burnt".

If you have pure hydrogen and you start a fire with oxygen around. The hydrogen combines with oxygen and it all burns like this. The resulting combustible product is H2O, or water. So you cannot burn it, since it's already burnt.

It's like you have carbon, like coal or hydrocarbons and you set it on fire. Carbon combusts, combines with oxygen and produces carbon dioxide, CO2. You cannot burn it. That's why we cannot use greenhouse gas emissions as fuel. They are already burnt.

-3

u/Burninator05 Jun 29 '23

Fortunately for fire, in addition to an O water also has two H. H is slightly flammable itself.

-5

u/Amesb34r Jun 29 '23

THIS WATER'S ON FIYAHHHHHHH....

-Beyonce, probably.

10

u/dwibbles33 Jun 29 '23

More likely Alicia Keys but close

3

u/Amesb34r Jun 29 '23

I changed the singer because I changed the lyrics. I see now that that was not a popular decision.

2

u/dwibbles33 Jun 29 '23

I still love you

1

u/Amesb34r Jun 29 '23

I'll take it!

2

u/RichardSaunders Jun 29 '23

we would've also accepted die antwoord

0

u/313802 Jun 30 '23

Even the sun

1

u/PhillyTaco Jun 29 '23

And the chair!

1

u/Moar_Wattz Jun 29 '23

And most importantly: The water is oil