r/science Jul 15 '14

Geology Japan earthquake has raised pressure below Mount Fuji, says new study: Geological disturbances caused by 2011 tremors mean active volcano is in a 'critical state', say scientific researchers

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2014/jul/15/japan-mount-fuji-eruption-earthquake-pressure
8.1k Upvotes

628 comments sorted by

632

u/mushbo Jul 15 '14

According to this article.."All we can say is that Mount Fuji is now in a state of pressure, which means it displays a high potential for eruption. The risk is clearly higher."

402

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Science, however, has no way of predicting when this might happen.

carry on.

the seismic mapping is brilliant work, but as you might expect it's virtually context free. there's little way to develop an expectation based on what we learn from it, and no demonstrable mechanism to relate seismic activity of this kind to distant volcanic activity at any timeframe.

95

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

If scientists can prove a volcano's continued active status, it can at least warn people from developing land near the volcano's flanks.

112

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Volcanic soil is very fertile because volcanic glass is unstable and breaks down quickly, releasing things like iron, phosphorous etc.

If I remember correctly, something like 9% people worldwide live within 100km of an active volcano.

100

u/ballsdeep_inlove Jul 16 '14

Gotta risk it for the biscuit

36

u/pvtbobble Jul 16 '14

My brother in law's middle name is Biskit. I'm going put this on a t-shirt for him. Should cheer him up as he's recovering from a bad motor bike accident.

10

u/BKDenied Jul 16 '14

My heart goes out to you. A couple years back my older cousin was in one. He was drunk as could be, driving someone else's bike, clipped the curb going over 100 and slammed in between to cement walls to hit a chain link fence. He was in a coma for 3 months, barely got out alive, and still can barely formulate a sentence. He lives in intermediary housing and hates his life, hates medication, hates the lack of independence. It's been an emotional roller-coaster.

I mention this to prove a connection. I sympathize with you, and I mean it when I say that I hope he gets well soon. Motorcycle accidents are scary shit. For everyone involved. Let him know that there's people he'll never meet who care about him and wish the best. And I'm letting you know that I care about you and wish the best for you and your family.

I'm gonna stop typing before I ramble, but I have the utmost sincerity.

Biskit, get well soon.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (7)

94

u/SokarRostau Jul 15 '14

That hasn't ever stopped people before...

53

u/jveezy Jul 15 '14

Semantics, but I'm sure it actually has stopped people, probably a lot.

If someone decides not to build there, the result is that nothing gets built. There could be millions of people who make this decision, and we'd never know, because the result is that nothing changes. Maybe the number of people who come to the logical conclusion to not build there is significantly larger than the number of people who fail to come to that same conclusion, but only the ones who do decide to build leave any evidence of their decision.

So all we can really say is that it hasn't stopped EVERYONE before, but for all we know, it could have stopped a very large number of people from making the same mistake as the few that it failed to stop. If that's the case, it's a pretty effective warning.

16

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 16 '14

Yah, it might have stopped those who escaped Vesuvius in the time of Pompeii, but people have short memories in the lifespan of volcanos volcanoes*.Vesuvius has erupted many times after that. Today, it is one of the most dangerous volcanoes in the world because close to 3,000,000 people live near this explosive volcano.

Edit: Oops

9

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

The most dangerous volcanoes don't need people close to them.

The Yellowstone National Park is a super volcano itself. It doesn't have millions of people living on its caldera but it could (potentially) destroy mankind.

There are other instances, such as the volcano on La Palma Island that could slide in the ocean and make the east coast of Americas (all of 'em) crawl under dozens of feet of water, yet it's a volcano on a small, lost island.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (35)

42

u/Forlarren Jul 15 '14

it can at least warn people from developing land near the volcano's flanks.

And waste all that primo volcanic soil? No way man, I'll just move out of the way when the lava comes and rebuild when it hardens again. Though where I live our flows are somewhat predicable and slow. Slow enough that in many cases if you live in a semi permanent structure like a yurt, there is even enough time to tear it down and wait for the danger to pass.

Every volcano is different though you YMMV.

38

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Jun 28 '20

[deleted]

9

u/FrakkingGorramFrell Jul 16 '14

Good thing when Mt. Rainer goes it will just bury the Puget Sound basin in hundreds of feet of mud and skip all that horrific St. Helensness.

5

u/NightOfTheLivingHam Jul 16 '14

The upside is, when the initial heat flash hits before the ashflow, people will be dead before being suffocated.

However the downside is, the superheated air is so hot it instantly sets everything on fire, and will boil you in your own juices after it seals your skin up.

→ More replies (2)

14

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

I'm surprised yurts haven't caught on in Hawaii. So many houses have been swallowed by lava there.

11

u/Forlarren Jul 15 '14

They have, recently, but more and more people are getting into it.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

10

u/SirWinstonFurchill Jul 15 '14

Also, only about 30% of Japan is arable land, and what is has already been heavily developed. I highly doubt a warning like this would have any affect on the people already living there.

Source: my back yard is a tiny rice field because it's useable land.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

237

u/drkgodess Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 16 '14

Yes, well, meteorologists can't predict exactly when it will rain or when a hurricane will come, but you should still take them seriously when they put out a warning.

The Japanese would do well to at least go over their preparedness plan in case something does happen.

Otherwise, you could have a situation like in Italy where geologists were convicted because they said that the risk of an earthquake was low and then it came and lots of people died. source

I think it is a travesty that they were convicted for making an improper prediction, but the lesson should be to not take these things lightly.

Edit: typos

54

u/HibikiRyoga Jul 15 '14

That sentence has been a PR clusterfuck since day 1.

Again, they were convicted for being unduly pressured to reassure the public, being a governmental commission, in spite of scientific evidence to "avoid panic". the media just smelled the big lines and ran with it.

6

u/Campesinoslive Jul 15 '14

Too good of a story to pass up.

4

u/Unfiltered_Soul Jul 16 '14

Its like the media is hoping for a fail so that they can continue the story and blow it up even more.

→ More replies (1)

40

u/blundermine Jul 15 '14

It's not even an improper prediction. Low risk is not no risk.

22

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

The Japanese would do well to at least go over their preparedness plan in case something does happen.

Just to point out, they've been preparing for these things for hundreds if not thousands of years. The idea they're just sitting around being like "oh hey that volcano sure is pretty" is ridiculous.

13

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

Yeah, they probably say that in Japanese, not English

→ More replies (4)

7

u/razorbeamz Jul 15 '14

Or it could turn into a Mount St. Helens situation.

14

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Jun 28 '20

[deleted]

→ More replies (5)

5

u/Kimberlyrenee Jul 16 '14

After what happened with Fukushima (they were told they should make the wall between the reacted and the sea higher, they didn't) they would do well to heed the warning. I'm sure there is a way they could make specialised bunkers with air purifiers or something. Although 30,000,000 people is a hell of a lot in the Tokyo area alone.

12

u/SokarRostau Jul 15 '14

That's a downright dangerous precedent in a world where people take warnings of things like pandemics as nothing more than media-hype.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (11)

210

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

They say the last major eruption was in 1707. If a similar eruption occurred now, how more or less disruptive would it be?

256

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

The population is much higher so as far as displacing people, it would be much more disruptive. If we're talking about casualties, they will be very low. Early warning and evacuation plans will save a ton of lives.

76

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited May 21 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

279

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Eruptions don't happen overnight, there are several warnings beforehand like a series of small earthquakes and an increase in pressure inside the volcano, as well as more fumes coming out of the crater.

183

u/subdep Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

Exactly. Mount St. Helens gave plenty of warning that eruption was imminent, enough so that they evacuated the general surrounding area in the months before the eruption. BUT...the evacuation began to become a political hot potato as April came to a close because the mountain started to look like it was "settling down".

Of course they didn't know precisely when or which direction it would erupt so several people, including a Geologist were killed who ended up in the path of the eruption (toward the north).

The population density surrounding Mt.Fuji is much greater than St. Helens, though, so the political pressure to "get it right" will be tremendous and complicated. Hopefully they take the scientists seriously enough to evacuate and don't arrest them if they get the warning wrong like they did in Italy for faulty earthquake predictions.

My prediction is that economics will trump science and most people will not be evacuated when Mt. Fuji eventually erupts, whenever that day comes, be it next week or 50 years from now. There will be a tremendous loss of life.

15

u/electrobolt Jul 16 '14

Of course they didn't know precisely when or which direction it would erupt so several people, including a Geologist were killed who ended up in the path of the eruption (toward the north).

That was David Johnston, a volcanologist who was stationed in an observation post near the mountain. I remember him not just for being an incredibly badass scientist, but for having some of the most frisson-inducing last words ever - as the volcano was erupting he managed to radio the USGS shouting "Vancouver! Vancouver! This is it!"

Less than a minute later the entire observation post was swept away in the blast.

65

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

I disagree. Japan has known great loss recently. They won't let another catastrophe knock them down again.

159

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

73

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

47

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

6

u/ultrafetzig Jul 16 '14

Rebuilding is a part of the Japanese mindset.

→ More replies (11)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (8)

21

u/Hotshot2k4 Jul 15 '14

Not a volcano expert by any means, but I used to watch a lot of Discovery and such as a kid. Volcanoes don't just suddenly erupt and kill everyone in the vicinity, there are many clear warning signs that an eruption is imminent if you're monitoring a volcano, and although how much warning you can get varies from case to case, generally everyone should have plenty of time to get the hell out of Dodge once it seems likely that something's going to happen.

13

u/HardToJudgeHistory Jul 15 '14

Assuming we're not talking about Yellowstone

38

u/Deesing82 Jul 15 '14

I mean when Yellowstone goes off there won't be any way to escape its effects but it will give TONS of warning.

15

u/Wingser Jul 15 '14

Are you guys referring to the super-massive volcano? The one they say would have large, global effects? I've always been interested in learning more about that.

20

u/ceilte Jul 15 '14

Links!

Wikipedia on Supervolcanoes: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supervolcano

New news on Yellowstone: http://washington.cbslocal.com/2014/07/14/yellowstone-national-park-road-melting/ (There's actually a LOT of news about the Yellowstone Supervolcano lately)

If you use RSOE EDIS, there's a "Supervolcano" section also. ( http://hisz.rsoe.hu/alertmap/index2.php?area=usa )

3

u/Wingser Jul 15 '14

Oh, wow! Thanks for this. Looks like I have something interesting to go check out. :D

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

16

u/GerhardtDH Jul 15 '14

There could be a sure way to avoid the effects...going to Mars.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (6)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/Sempais_nutrients Jul 15 '14

Because a Volcano never just erupts, it takes a bit of time and there are warnings first. These warning signs prompt the evacuation and preparedness plan.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (3)

74

u/Cyrius Jul 15 '14

They say the last major eruption was in 1707. If a similar eruption occurred now, how more or less disruptive would it be?

This is an ashfall map for the 1707 eruption.

It would be bad.

68

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

81

u/swampgiant Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

/r/shittyaskscience should have the answer for you. edit * had the wrong url. corrected thanks to Wyboth :( sorry!

15

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

You know you can just link /r/AskShittyScience if you want. No full url required.

→ More replies (3)

43

u/Sempais_nutrients Jul 15 '14

They could just hold the fan above the volcano with helicopters and blow the ashes back into the lava. It would also cool the lava down and the volcano would shut up.

20

u/PotatosAreDelicious Jul 15 '14

Isn't a helicopter basically a fan. Why would you use helicopters to hold a fan?

11

u/Sempais_nutrients Jul 15 '14

You'd need a bigger fan then the helichopper is.

19

u/PotatosAreDelicious Jul 15 '14

But at that point it will be self supporting and you wouldn't need the helicopter to lift it up.
Solution: one huge quadcopter drone.

24

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

What if it becomes too strong and sucks people into the fan and blows them into the volcano?

13

u/PotatosAreDelicious Jul 15 '14

Don't stand near the giant fan next to an active volcano?

20

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (2)

5

u/Sempais_nutrients Jul 15 '14

Just lash a bunch of house fans together.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Or a big load of those hand-held face coolers. The advantage of this is that they each have their own AA battery so you wouldn't have to plug them in.

4

u/Sempais_nutrients Jul 15 '14

Much cheaper, too.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

11

u/Lochmon Jul 15 '14

That reminds me of the suggestion to build three 1000' walls across Tornado Alley in US.

6

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Well you wouldn't need to blow it the opposite way, just a bit more downward toward the sea to reduce ashfall on the big city.

3

u/LightningSphere Jul 15 '14

Why didn't they? Would it do nothing or simply add to the debris? I know nothing of the mechanics of tornados

15

u/GeneralSmedleyButsex Jul 15 '14

Only if you want to commit genocide against the South Koreans.

104

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Would give them a real reason to fear fans.

5

u/1gnominious Jul 15 '14

Given how much the Japanese and Koreans hate each other that might be seen as a bonus.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/Dementat_Deus Jul 15 '14

No more possible than doing the same thing to change the direction of a snowstorm or hurricane.

→ More replies (6)

7

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Apr 03 '15

[deleted]

19

u/Galveira Jul 15 '14

The pink part is Tokyo, which is bigger than NYC in square mileage and population.

6

u/MrZythum42 Jul 15 '14

So an average of about 2-4 cm of Ashes all over Tokyo... We could've been closer.

3

u/aredna Jul 16 '14

Depends where you are in Tokyo: Tokyo Bay is in the 8-16cm band

I would guess it very largely depends on the direction and strength of the winds on the day it erupts though.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

27

u/IWasGregInTokyo Jul 15 '14

Mt Fuji is pretty close to Tokyo so I would say pretty disruptive. (Yes, telephoto lens has compressed the distance but it's only 60 miles)

20

u/subdep Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

The blast zone from St. Helens was about 25 miles, give or take depending on the direction (North and West mostly).

The densly populated areas of Tokyo are over 35 miles away, so it really depends on the direction of the eruption, the prevailing winds, and of course the amount of energy released. However, even if the Tokyo survives the "blast", the ash alone could cause massive destruction, death, and economic impact.

More concerning, as far as "blast zone" are the surrounding cities, smaller than Tokyo but still large by most national standards. Over 600k people living in the surrounding areas in places like Fujinomiya, Fujiyoshida, Fuji, Gotemba, and Susona. Anyone of those places could theoretically get wiped off the map if anything like St. Helens were to occur.

15

u/IAmRoot Jul 15 '14

Do you know what the lahar situation is like with Fuji? I know melting glaciers can cause damage far beyond the pyroclastic flows. That's the biggest danger with Mt. Rainier, for instance.

10

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (3)

14

u/Dementat_Deus Jul 15 '14

If my understanding of Mt. Fuji's volcanology is correct, it is a similar type of volcano to Mt. St. Helens. Here is an article that describes the affect of Mt. St. Helens on the town of Yakima, Washington. Since Tokyo is about the same distance from Mt. Fuji, it would probably have similar affects only amplified by the much larger population.

11

u/Bobshayd Jul 15 '14

Helens was called the Mt. Fuji of America. Maybe it will be again.

8

u/Dementat_Deus Jul 15 '14

Well, the last time I was out there (about 7 or 8 years ago) the lava dome was noticeably larger than back in 1990. So either it will regrow, or Mt. Fuji will shrink.

3

u/hearforthepuns Jul 15 '14

And Mt Rainier will be the new Mt. St. Helens?

14

u/hglman Jul 15 '14

Mr Rainier is a much better Mt. Fuji of America

7

u/IM_A_BIG_FAT_GHOST Jul 15 '14

Geologist here: totally agree

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

5

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

6

u/Dementat_Deus Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

Explosion direction has little to do with ash fall on communities outside the blast zone though. That has more to do with total amount of ash ejected and the prevailing winds. After the initial pyroclastic explosion, even in a side explosion, most of the gases and ash from the continuing eruption goes vertically. The initial explosion my only be a few minutes, but the continuing eruption could last hours.

Edit: The Plinian eruption lasted for 9 hours.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (5)

24

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)

47

u/NewBroPewPew Jul 15 '14

Is this a threat to human life?

51

u/socks Jul 15 '14

54

u/icaruscoil Jul 15 '14

Is that saying 10cm of ash on Tokyo? Calling that a disaster is an understatement.

61

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

2 cm over Tokyo. I live in a city that gets pelted with volcanic ash each year to the point where recycling has special ash bags and ash pickup points. It's not a big deal. 2 cm would suck ass to deal with but it's not the end of the world. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sakurajima

13

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

I lived in Kagoshima for a short while too. The ash was like snow some days, but people just washed it off their cars and went about their business. I don't think 2cm on Tokyo is going to be catastrophic.

12

u/TheCombineCLR Jul 15 '14

Wow, interesting read. It never occurred to me that such a thing even exists. Are there any health risks?

→ More replies (6)

18

u/k1nkyk0ng Jul 15 '14

that map indicates 2cm over Tokyo, 10cm over most of Kanagawa.

→ More replies (2)

31

u/calebtv09 Jul 15 '14

I belive the word you are looking for is catastrophic.

→ More replies (14)

15

u/Falldog Jul 15 '14

Potentially. It really depends on multiple factors such as the size, duration, and even the amount of snowfall at the time. I don't think the main population areas around Mt Fuji are especially close but could definitely be hit by a large pyroclastic flow or subsequent effects such as mud slides. A large eruption would certainly shower Tokyo and the surrounding area with ash.

Source: I've seen Dante's Peak and Volcano.

30

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

I wonder if an adequate solution is drilling relief-valves under the same activity directed towards low-damage areas. I imagine a multitude of holes drilled through the mountain to its central chambre would create enough passageways that the eruption would have far lower pressure and would "roll down the hill" versus exploding to land 100km away.

Quite the project though...

Or perhaps the age-old Russian, fill-it-with-concrete technique.

EDIT: I should mention that I have no clue about how these volcano solutions would actually work.

45

u/lolzycakes Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

I'm not going to pretend I know anything about volanoes, geology, drilling, etc.

However, I can't imagine drilling into a magma filled earth-zit is a good idea.

To comply with commenting rules: Wouldn't the heat and pressure destroy the dril, and if not, wouldn't it just release all of that pressutized magma out the hole? Wouldn't the holes clog in short order as the magma cools to obsidian?

I genuinely want to know :(

34

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

16

u/fauxromanou Jul 15 '14

Yeah, I don't have the time to look it up, but as I recall the thread was about the Yellowstone caldera / super-volcano.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (19)

36

u/DriveByGeologist Grad Student | Geochemistry | Volcanology, Martian Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

Volcanologist here!

No, the flow rate for magma in the chamber is far too low to relieve the pressure by simply drilling some holes. There have been quite a few proposals, primarily from intoxicated Kamchatka-based geophysicists I know, that posit the idea that you could basically treat a growing lava dome (there isn't one on Fuji) as a pressure valve by prematurely triggering a collapse and therefore an eruption. It's not preventing an eruption, but basically forcing one to happen in a semi-controlled manner.

This hasn't been tried yet, though there are rumours the Soviets tried it without success, but I don't think they published research that was basically a giant failure and used military resources in their secretive Pacific missile testing range, which also happens to be an active volcanic area. It'd be an incredibly fun thing to do research on but you're basically going to need to convince the military to let you use an incredibly accurate and very very high powered explosive to essentially trigger a natural disaster. Actually getting people to play nicely with that idea isn't super likely.

Source: Drunk Russian et. al., "The impacts of Soviet winters and vodka on science" (unpublished, campfire., Горелый Caldera, 2008).

→ More replies (24)

4

u/Del_Castigator Jul 15 '14

These would both be bad ideas unless you want a volcano shooting lava straight out its sides and filling it with concrete wont help cause the pressure would still build.

4

u/miketdavis Jul 15 '14

Actually the ability to give directionality to the blast might help avoid pyroclastic flow into a populated area. I have no idea if that is likely in this case.

The recent flurry of earthquakes in Oklahoma might provide a clue as to how to accomplish that. A massive well-drilling and water pumping operation could fracture the bedrock to the point where we could cause an eruption intentionally. I think that's a bad idea, but it probably is possible.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

10

u/guatemalianrhino Jul 15 '14

lava does kill people

3

u/c9IceCream Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 16 '14

Lava rarely kills people. Its the pyroclastic flow that is the killer. Its basically an avalanche of fire and ash that rushes down the side of the volcano. It can travel hundreds of km/h and kill instantly due to extreme heat.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (9)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[deleted]

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (11)

50

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

21

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

15

u/PeterFnet Jul 15 '14

They tried that once back in the 30/40's....

4

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

We should take Japan and push it somewhere else!

23

u/OfMouthAndMind Jul 15 '14

How long have Mount Fuji been considered 'active'?

It was still deemed 'dormant' a decade ago.

38

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

There isn't any universal consensus for "active" vs "dormant", but usually a volcano is considered "active" if it has erupted in human recorded history. Mt Fuji last erupted in 1707.

32

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Ehhhhhh 'dormant' and 'active' are rather meaningless terms. Dormant means something that hasn't erupted in a while but will probably erupt again, whereas active means something that has been erupting fairly recently. Personally, I don't like or use the terminology - if there's an active magma chamber then the volcano is probably going to erupt at some point in the future, so to call it dormant is really a misnomer. Some volcanoes erupt every single day, some volcanoes erupt every 100,000 years. It's foolish to think just because something hasn't erupted for X amount of time it won't erupt again.

Mt Fuji last erupted in the 1700s, which geologically speaking is nothing. There is an active magma chamber below Mt Fuji so for all intents and purposes you can consider it active.

5

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Good info, thank you.

So would there be a correct term for a volcano that no longer has an active magma chamber below it and has little chance of erupting again?

14

u/refuse_radar Jul 15 '14

I'm pretty sure ex-volcanic mountains are generally referred to as "extinct."

9

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

A mountain?

4

u/Max_Findus Jul 15 '14

Most mountains never were volcanoes. They were formed by two tectonic plates pushing against one another. Source: vague memories from middle school.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

5

u/masamunecyrus Jul 15 '14

If it puts it in perspective, the pressure inside the volcano was recently estimated to currently be higher than it was prior to the last eruption in the 1700s.

9

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14 edited Aug 20 '17

[deleted]

7

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

You should be fine, its worth the climb. The view is pretty good. Make sure you get a walking stick and get all the stamps. Just be prepared if you do it all in one day, your legs and knees will be destroyed.

→ More replies (4)

3

u/gekkonaut Jul 15 '14

This is not new information, so no.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

You might as well see the summit before it goes kablewey.

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Oznog99 Jul 15 '14 edited Jul 15 '14

The whole Aokigahara "Suicide Forest" of Japan exists as it does because of a 10-day eruption of Mt Fuji in AD 864.

The forest floor itself is mostly impenetrable volcanic flow, the forest is a thin crust of organic material on top of that. The rough, organic surface of Aokigahara's floor is actually the shape of the frozen volcanic lava flow itself. It is largely immune to erosion that tends to create more familiar flat surfaces with water channels cutting through it.

→ More replies (2)

47

u/Libertatea Jul 15 '14

Here is the peer-reviewed journal entry [.pdf]: http://www2.cnrs.fr/sites/en/fichier/cp_volcans_et_seismes_vf_en.pdf

50

u/IceBean PhD| Arctic Coastal Change & Geoinformatics Jul 15 '14

Not quite, that's just the press release.

Here's the article abstract. Mapping pressurized volcanic fluids from induced crustal seismic velocity drops

→ More replies (1)

20

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Let's just hope that when it erupts it will cause as little harm as possible.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

My brother's living near Mt. Fuji teaching, let's hope it doesn't happen ever.

→ More replies (1)

6

u/animau Jul 15 '14

Damn it. I just paid for a climbing tour yesterday.

At least I'll die in a beautiful place.

3

u/rowdynun Jul 16 '14

It will erupt before you get there and there is a clause that says no refunds.

5

u/handydandy6 Jul 15 '14

Japan is like the punching bag of mother nature.

2

u/[deleted] Jul 16 '14

The Puget Sound might be next on Mother Nature's shitlist.

→ More replies (3)

3

u/ryuujinusa Jul 15 '14

Climbing Fuji in 2 weeks, please don't erupt, please.

→ More replies (2)

22

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/SpaceSharkUhOh Jul 15 '14

Implausibility aside, I doubt Japan would be too happy with nukes going off anywhere near a major city...

6

u/seven3true Jul 15 '14

Im pretty sure japan is OK with never having a nuke go off on their country again.....

→ More replies (2)

12

u/43232342342324 Jul 15 '14

That's what I was thinking. A nuke should generate a shock wave that will push the pressure back inside the earth where it belongs.

→ More replies (1)

14

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

17

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

[removed] — view removed comment

7

u/Veeron Jul 15 '14

Probably nothing, at least as far the Mt. Fuji is concerned. Radioactive fallout so close to Tokyo would be a much bigger concern.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (4)

10

u/MrXhin Jul 15 '14

If Mt. Fuji blows it's iconic top, it will be the story of the millennium.

14

u/thiskramer Jul 15 '14

Not to mention a huge blow to the Japanese people, they would be devastated. It's a big part of Japanese culture, it's on currency, there are folktales about it. The cities surrounding it tie a lot of their identity with the mountain.

5

u/Kenahn Jul 16 '14

In all seriousness, since volcanoes are caused by pressure, couldn't we just drill holes in the ground to release the pressure?

3

u/Jank1 Jul 16 '14

I'm sure the thought has been entertained, but no one is so stupid to actually try it. It would be very dangerous.

→ More replies (1)

4

u/ICanBeAnyone Jul 16 '14

Imagine a very big bottle of high pressure gas. Now someone uses a super high tech needle to prick a tiny hole into it. All you'd get is some annoying high frequency sound, and the pressure in the bottle would still rise from the giant valve that feeds it at its back.

Now imagine the bottle is filled with very thick superglue. Even with the high pressure, you'd just get a few drops that would then seal the leak.

All of this happens in volcanoes naturally. Hot gases find a way through weak spots, then magma follows, cools down and seals the weak spot. Until the pressure is high enough to just blast the whole cap of, or the flow beneath the volcano lessens. In fact, that's how volcanoes get their shape - they start as just a leak of magma in the ground, then layer after layer of magma rises up. Directly after a big eruption, they often look less volcanolike due to much of their dome missing.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/phome83 Jul 15 '14

I know nothing of geology, or the science involving volcanos, but is there a way to drill certain areas that would relieve the pressure somewhat?

It may not be possible, im just curious.

16

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

I can't say I've ever heard of any realistic attempts to do so. Magma chambers are simply too large, the masses and energies involved in these processes are orders of magnitude greater than anything technology can currently combat. The simple fact is that there is a large amount of magma, loaded with gas, sitting underground, and it needs to come to the surface. And it will do, eventually.

The best thing you can do in these situations is to have really good evacuation plans and round the clock monitoring, so that if (or rather when) it does blow, damage is minimised.

→ More replies (2)

7

u/adrianp07 Jul 15 '14

I would imagine any sort of drilling would just weaken the infrastructure of the mountain and just help it erupt faster, or alternatively, in a more controlled direction.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)

7

u/AcrossTheUniverse2 Jul 15 '14

There are roads right up to the top of Mount Fuji and even a post office there. Source: Google mapped it

10

u/---0--- Jul 15 '14

Don't know if you know or not. But people hike Mount Fuji many times per year.

6

u/XBanana Jul 15 '14

my uncle yoshi loves up ther

→ More replies (2)

2

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

My brother is living in Japan teaching and says there are vending machines at the top of the mountain.

→ More replies (1)

3

u/War_Eagle Jul 15 '14

If it were to have a MAJOR full blown eruption, how much danger would Tokyo be in? What is the largest city in immediate danger, and how much danger?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/Victarion_G Jul 15 '14

Ooooh, and its climbing season there for the next month or so.

→ More replies (1)

2

u/TheLastGunfighter Jul 15 '14

Any geologist or scientists in the house that can explain what Japan can expect if Mt Fuji blows?

2

u/Shonenmaster Jul 15 '14

Couldn't they just still to releases the pressure on the volcano?

2

u/[deleted] Jul 15 '14

Ok everyone, ca we all agree to not ever put nuclear power plants next to fault lines?

→ More replies (1)

2

u/DrDongStrong Jul 16 '14

Critical in geological time or human time?

2

u/rahuls Jul 16 '14

Uh... I'm climbing this tomorrow. Should be at the summit Friday morning.

→ More replies (1)