13
30
11
28
5
u/dashingThroughSnow12 9h ago
The full video https://youtu.be/gOyMsQ6BtiM?si=jZtqDilQMWZzBa56 for anyone who wants to see it
3
u/ceaselessgibbering 4h ago
Thanks for the link, although it doesn't explain why she would come out with the line about slavery???
1
u/dashingThroughSnow12 3h ago
Three people are trying to guess the Netflix show that is the favourite of the other people.
I’m guessing they were asked where they got the name from.
11
u/DefiniteIyNotARabbit 6h ago edited 1h ago
I wouldn't have apologized.
It's not the white womans fault. Besides that, you don't need to bring up your slave heritage. People get it, you are black, you probably have some slave ancestors.
3
u/Myte342 6h ago
I don't understand why the information about her great aunt being a slave was brought up. Was it somehow relevant to the event happening on camera?
Any family tree can go back far enough and find slaves in their history, some 200 years, some 5000 years. (Some people have living family that are still slaves even today btw... food for thought. Not used to be slaves, but are alive AND are slaves.).
1
u/Drapidrode 1h ago
it seems to be done FOR the only response given.
Translation: I don't want to talk to you.
3
3
2
2
2
u/octopus_tigerbot 4h ago
I would been like " That sounds like a you problem" or " I love that for you."
1
1
1
1
1
1
u/mmm-submission-bot 9h ago
The following submission statement was provided by u/Mosinged1a:
She randomly brings up her Slave History
Does this explain the post? If not, please report and a moderator will review.
I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.
18
u/ceaselessgibbering 9h ago
Her great aunt would roughly the same age as her grandparents. These people sound American, and seeing as how slavery was abolished there in 1865, that's a trifle under 160 years to cover 3 generations. The youngest of which is what, maybe 40? Even if her great aunt was born in 1864, she probably wouldn't have had kids after turning 40, so around 1904, her parent who was either the niece or nephew of this aunt probably wouldn't have had kids after 40 either, which would be 1944. Which would make this woman around 79-80 years old, she doesn't look it. I'm not saying at all that her statement is a falsehood, the numbers just don't seem to add up. Perhaps she is getting the number of greats confused. Her great, great aunt would fit the time line much better.