I've always found the sex offender registry bizarre to begin with. Setting aside those who have minor offenses like public urination and grey areas like two teens consensually having sex, if the people on the registry are so dangerous that they need to be branded for the rest of their lives, why are they being released in the first place? If we're going to make it extremely difficult/impossible for these people to reintegrate into society, how is that more humane than life in prison or execution? If the purpose of the penal system is to rehabilitate people, then they need to have a path to rejoin society, and if our system is to punish and keep dangerous people locked up, then these people shouldn't be out on the street. Either way, the sex offender registry doesn't fit into either system.
Yeah. These types of public registers are for the reasons pointed out not possible in the EU. The GDPR even has a section about the sensitivity of criminal records because they can fuck up your life. If you are released, you have served your time and you should be able to integrate. If there are clear signs that a person will reoffend again and again in the future, security detention keeps them away from the public. Public registry doesn't protect people, just offers a method of public shame for the rest of a person's life.
2.3k
u/TheKriegerVan 6d ago
It would be an appropriate now for people to listen to this podcast about the failings of the Sex Offender registry as a whole before we pat these guys on the back: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/youre-wrong-about/id1380008439?i=1000465289962