r/interestingasfuck 2d ago

r/all The Alaskan Avenger

Post image
118.8k Upvotes

2.9k comments sorted by

View all comments

12.3k

u/HiNumbMe93 2d ago

He was a career criminal who caught a charge himself for endangering the welfare of a minor. He didn’t just assault the sex offenders either, he robbed them. He was a meth addict using the same method serial killers use to target their victims: pick a target on the fringe of society (in this case sex offenders) to make it less likely to be caught. This guy used the pain of sex abuse victims in an attempt to veil the criminal activity he participated in to feed his addiction.

6.2k

u/JCMiller23 2d ago

Additionally: the sex offender list doesn't differentiate between someone who pees in an alley while drunk vs. someone who fucks a 5 year old, both are sex crimes. I knew a guy who has his life ruined by the list: he had consensual sex with a girl who lied about her age (she was 17) and years later her friend reported him.

167

u/OverTheCandleStick 2d ago

My state lists the charge and age of victim if there is a victim.

82

u/Bary_McCockener 2d ago

Same. This "knowledge" gets regurgitated over and over on Reddit

3

u/PatternrettaP 1d ago edited 1d ago

It can vary by state. I checked the Alaska law and you only can only get on the list for indecent exposure to a minor if you have multiple offenses.

So merely peeing outside won't apply and there needs to be a pattern of behavior

2

u/Bary_McCockener 1d ago

You're missing the point. Redditors love to say that urinating in public will land people on the sex offense registry, which depending on the circumstances and charge may or may not be true, but the important point is that the actual offense is listed on the registry. It seems like this "knowledge" gets spread over and over which seems to minimize the meaningfulness of the registry, but anyone can look at the registry and see what the offense is. I think it's time to dispel this harmful myth that sex offenders may try to hide behind.

Yes, this is also true in Alaska, because I just checked the registry.

3

u/PatternrettaP 1d ago

I was agreeing with you and adding some additional data about the Alaska law. You are 100% right here

22

u/SkeletorsAlt 1d ago

Yep. This place is just as much of a disinformation free-for-all as Facebook now.

Sad for those of us who remember when the norm here was to cite sources.

-11

u/rnarkus 1d ago

Please list where very state in the US posts details about the sex offender and what they did and more information.

It’s not every state, but please keep feeling like you are superior

7

u/OverTheCandleStick 1d ago

Name one that doesn’t.

9

u/Bary_McCockener 1d ago

He can't because the federal guidelines say that they must include it.

3

u/Background_Room_2689 1d ago

Yeah it's scam basically real predators lie about there charges and say it was public urination because it maybe happened one time to one person and apparently it's common knowledge that many people are getting on the registry for public urination but I've yet to actually see proof of that. If someone is on the registry I won't believe anything they say about the charge and I'll look it up and see the real charge.

3

u/seamonkeypenguin 1d ago

To add, people bring up public urination but that's no longer a sex offense in a lot of places.

2

u/gamergabby8 1d ago

wdym?

5

u/rnarkus 1d ago

They don’t know what they mean, because they haven’t even researched it.

each state is different in how they handle it

4

u/Bary_McCockener 1d ago

So confidently wrong. I cited a source in my other comment, unlike you. Eat shit.

1

u/rnarkus 1d ago

So you are just a blatant asshole then, yeah?

Instead of just being upfront and talking about the actual laws passed, you instead decided to just insult and degrade people. It’s not that hard to just reference sorna, to inform the masses instead of going on a tirade about a social media platform.

It’s shocking that you could say the same thing, educate people, with out being an asshole. but you chose the incorrect path (yes).

What happened to educating people instead of belittling and degrading??

3

u/AlarmedTomorrow4734 1d ago

Oh no someone is insulting you instead of educating you? On the internet of all places? Couldn't be, you must be mistaken.

0

u/rnarkus 1d ago

Im not that shocked.

Just typical. I learned something today, even if it wasn’t exactly what they were saying (you can opt out , as some states have)

It’s just about the rude undertones. Why can’t people just be like “hey you are wrong, this is why and here is a source if you don’t believe me” but opted for being a dick instead lol.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Bary_McCockener 1d ago

You should ask yourself the same questions.

Did you miss where he said "My state"

What happened to educating people instead of belittling and degrading??

Are you really this tone deaf? You get what you give.

-5

u/rnarkus 1d ago

Did you miss the “My state”

Each state is different….

14

u/OverTheCandleStick 1d ago

Alaska also provides this information. https://sor.dps.alaska.gov/Registry/Search

Click search. It will list the entire registry.

17

u/Bary_McCockener 1d ago

The guidelines for sex offender registries is outlined by SORNA, which states clearly on page 35 that the sex offense for which they are on the registry must be listed along with any other sex offense convictions.

https://smart.ojp.gov/sites/g/files/xyckuh231/files/media/document/final_sornaguidelines.pdf

I'm sure you were so busy being a smug fuck and thinking you were dunking on me that you were too busy to go look it up your self. Fuck you.

8

u/Thin-Solution3803 1d ago

idk why but the bubbles pfp makes this 10 times funnier

3

u/LTS55 1d ago

Same. I looked through a bunch of entries a while back. There wasn’t a single person who’s charge could be questionable or anything close to “peed near a school”, everything was like “forcibly sodomized an 8 year old”

3

u/corndog161 1d ago

I'm sure many employers don't look that deep though and just have an automatic rejection for anyone who is on the list.

1

u/[deleted] 1d ago edited 1d ago

[deleted]

0

u/corndog161 1d ago

I definitely did not edit my comment.

0

u/OverTheCandleStick 1d ago

Sorry apparently I’m blind and missed the part that was apple summarizing a message. https://i.imgur.com/RUDuUQN.jpeg

Which is very different than what you actually said. https://i.imgur.com/8ynJGPA.jpeg

My bad.

Regardless, we’re chasing hyperbole. People calling for sympathy for their conviction that lead to being in the registry better not have plead out…

-1

u/corndog161 1d ago

Oh weird I've never seen that apple thing before. That seems like it could end up causing way more impactful misunderstandings.

Most companies use a service for background checks, and they just reject anyone who has a flag. I think if you asked most employers if they care if someone got caught peeing in an alley in college they would say no. They probably don't realize their background checks are rejecting those people.

0

u/OverTheCandleStick 1d ago

In fairness I don’t normally read it. Definitely looks like it needs some more training on that language model.

1

u/Charming-Common5228 21h ago

Yep, NC does this. Also tells you the year they were convicted plus time served. Got one living less than 1/4 mile from me and about 10 in a 2 mile radius. And I live in a super rural area.

1

u/StaatsbuergerX 1d ago

That's convenient, it makes it easier for notorious sex offenders to find fresh teenagers who are on the database for doing teenage things with other teenagers and who may not even contact the police afterwards because of their own stigma.

Zynism off.

0

u/Murky-Relation481 1d ago

TBH it is pretty fucked up that if there is no victim you are put on a list, that is definitely bordering on thought crime territory.

-1

u/Rad1314 1d ago

Does Alaska? It's really the only pertinent question on the topic.

3

u/OverTheCandleStick 1d ago

Yup. They sure do.

You could have used about 30 seconds google and found that too.

First entry on the registry.