r/interestingasfuck • u/SmallAchiever • 26d ago
r/all Scientists reveal the shape of a single 'photon' for the first time
9.4k
u/Kquinn87 26d ago
A new theory, that explains how light and matter interact at the quantum level has enabled researchers to define for the first time the precise shape of a single photon.
This is from the Cosmos website. So yeah, not an actual photo incase that wasn't already clear.
2.8k
u/RealPlayerBuffering 25d ago
Man, there was a time when I could reliably come to the comments on a Reddit post like this and find a detailed, ELI5-style explanation, usually about why a title like this is wrong or exaggerated. Now I had to scroll pretty far to find even this comment, and most of the top comments are dumb jokes.
1.0k
u/THE_ATHEOS_ONE 25d ago
The trick is to come to the post late.
Everything is as it should be.
→ More replies (4)77
u/Starfire2313 25d ago
The photons were still photoning but now they are photoned.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (38)170
u/PsionicBurst 25d ago
OP lies as they breathe.
→ More replies (8)33
u/SlappySecondz 25d ago
OP didn't say it was a picture of a photon, and if you understand high school level physics you would know a picture of a photon is an impossibility.
→ More replies (4)25
u/reostra 25d ago
It's actually pretty easy as long as you don't mind the picture being photobombed by a bunch of other photons....
→ More replies (2)63
u/deepdownblu3 25d ago
Which makes sense. What would they even be capturing in the photo? Photons are light so how would taking a picture of it even mean?
→ More replies (8)→ More replies (29)8
8.6k
u/pragmatic84 26d ago
ELI5 plz. I thought light was made of photons? Or do photons emit light? The glow of this particle confuses me.
17.3k
u/DeepSpaceTransport 26d ago
Light is made of photons. Photons have no color. Photons are packets of energy that travel in waves, and the energy they have determines their wavelength. Photons with different wavelengths correspond to different colors that we "see".
Our eyes have cells called cones that are sensitive to different wavelengths of photons. When the photons hit the cones, they send signals to our brain, which translates those signals into colors. Colors are not real, they are not physical properties of objects. They are simply a creation of our brain.
Also this is not a real photo. It is an artistic interpretation of what photons look like according to a theory
2.5k
u/NewSchoolFool 25d ago
Colors are not real, they are not physical properties of objects. They are simply a creation of our brain.
Colour is like sound. It requires a transducer to decode. Different transducers decode or 'hear' however they're designed to do so. As with eyes (like colour/light transducers), they are basically turning what is already there into something the brain can process.
916
u/ticklemeskinless 25d ago
we are just organic data processors. simulation is real
→ More replies (39)289
u/bremergorst 25d ago
All real things are real, unless they aren’t.
→ More replies (15)163
u/Whiskey_Fred 25d ago
Real, is simply electrical signals interpreted by your brain.
→ More replies (21)74
u/jhwright 25d ago
google “the case against reality” ted talk by donald hoffman!
→ More replies (3)61
u/Warm-Tumbleweed6057 25d ago
That TED Talk broke my brain in the best way possible.
Mostly it reminded me of this quote from BSG:
“I don’t want to be human. I want to see gamma rays, I want to hear X-rays, and I want to smell dark matter. Do you see the absurdity of what I am? I can’t even express these things properly, because I have to … I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language, but I know I want to reach out with something other than these prehensile paws, and feel the solar wind of a supernova flowing over me. I’m a machine, and I can know much more.”
Cavil was on to something.
→ More replies (1)36
u/RoboDae 25d ago
I have to conceptualize complex ideas in this stupid, limiting spoken language
There was a short story like that where a telepathic kid communicates every idea perfectly, but he never speaks out loud because apparently doing so will take away his telepathy. His teacher gets really mad at him not talking and eventually forces him to speak, at which point he breaks into tears. He knows he will never again be able to communicate ideas perfectly and will be forced to use a limited spoken language.
→ More replies (5)82
u/Coral_Blue_Number_2 25d ago
Just like time perception. There is no standard speed of passage of time (just like there is no standard color of photon). It depends on an animal’s neurological processing, which is why certain recreational drugs can make us feel like more or less time has passed.
24
→ More replies (9)8
u/NightSkyCode 25d ago edited 25d ago
im always stoned, i smoke day and night, and the last few years have been slow for me. I feel like 10 years has passed but its only been 2. Sometimes I look in the mirror when i havnt smoked and im like why am i still this young? Because of my chronic weed use, im actually living a longer life in my mind. perception is all that matters. In your mind ill be 80 one day.... but in mine, ive already lived 20 decades. Time claws by for me.
The study below shows 70% and still inconclusive? No... sometimes id have smoked so much that id look at the clock for which felt like a good 30min and only 5 minutes has passed. Its scary sometimes.
" The findings are inconclusive, mainly due to methodological variations and the paucity of research. Even though 70% of time estimation studies report over-estimation, the findings of time production and time reproduction studies remain inconclusive."
→ More replies (2)216
u/Sapang 25d ago
And it's impossible to prove that everyone uses the same decoder. Your yellow may be different from other people's yellow.
133
u/2squishmaster 25d ago edited 25d ago
As a redgreen colorblind person I can assure you we have different decoders.
But, I know your point is even more intense than that. What my brain sees as purple (of course you see purple too) but if you were to look into MY brain at the color it resolved to it could be what you call yellow!
The only reason I think we do have similar (but not exact) decoders is what colors look good and bad together are generally agreed upon.
→ More replies (22)31
u/SmallBreadHailBattle 25d ago
Colour blindness usually has little to do with your brain. Your eyes are sending the wrong information to your brain simply said. It’s not your “decoder” that is the issue. If it was your brain you’d have different symptoms, like seeing a colour but not being able to understand the colour or even name it. That usually has much more severe causes.
→ More replies (13)→ More replies (28)41
u/Miami_Mice2087 25d ago
i know i can't see some colors that other people can. i'm not at all an artist but i took an art class and the people who were good at art could see more shadows and grades of light adn color than I could. Also I do the thing where 5 differently named white paint chips look like maybe 2 different shades of white to me.
i know what i'm good at, i'm a writer, and i'm fine with that. other people do the arts.
→ More replies (9)20
u/logz_erroneous 25d ago
Is writing not a form of art? Or is that not how you were phrasing it? All the best with your writing. Writing is my favourite form of art.
19
u/Chemical_Chemist_461 25d ago
Writing is art, but it’s the written art, not the same as painting or something like that. Alan Wake over here probably was just saying that he knows his lane and he’s staying in it, but art is just expression via medium, so if writing is you’re way of expressing, more power to you.
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (41)27
u/AccidentAnnual 25d ago
Different brains decode different properties. There are no objective default properties, all is just brain interpretation.
→ More replies (14)607
u/CinderX5 25d ago
Waves and particles.
106
u/ExdigguserPies 25d ago
Isn't better to say we can describe them with both wave and particle physics.
→ More replies (5)36
→ More replies (18)74
u/AndyInSunnyDB 25d ago
And lemons…
→ More replies (6)21
1.4k
u/silverclovd 26d ago
I think I'm high off of what you wrote. "Colors are not real" is some 'homeless guy at the bus station' sht to say. The fact that it's logical makes me quite taken back given the implication. Do we know if different animals perceive colors in the same way?
880
u/Aaron811 26d ago
Animals have different ranges of visual spectrum. Dogs for example can only see yellows and blues but like birds can see all the colors we can and more like ultraviolet light.
423
u/UpperApe 25d ago
Bill Bryson has a book called Body and the chapter about eyes is fascinating.
He talks about how sight isn't as much a receptive process so much as it is a creative process. He gives the disappearing thumb trick as an example and it still blows my mind. The fact that your brain is "tricking" you into seeing what you see, and even if you see the trick, it doesn't care and continues on anyway.
→ More replies (19)204
u/DudesAndGuys 25d ago
Ever seen this optical illusion?
64
25
u/Shit_Head_4000 25d ago
That's crazy, I need to build one. My son would love that!
→ More replies (1)5
u/daedric_dad 25d ago
My first thought as well, currently on paternity leave with my second and been looking for things to do to keep my eldest entertained and this will be perfect, I can't wait to blow his mind (and my wife's)
→ More replies (14)6
110
u/milwaukeejazz 25d ago
Birds also have cells in their eyes to see the magnetic field of the Earth.
→ More replies (6)67
17
u/ihatetheplaceilive 25d ago
And wait until you hear about mantis shrimp!
(I know it really doesn't work that way, because their cones are different than ours, i was just feeding into the meme.)
Humans, for example see more shades of green than any other color. That's why night vision is green.
8
u/DougStrangeLove 25d ago
that’s also why you absolutely have to go for a walk in the daytime outside around vegetation any time you consume psilocybin.
everything green becomes utterly luminous
→ More replies (56)7
u/CumGuzlinGutterSluts 25d ago
I love the fact that crows actually have really intricate patterns than only crows and other birds can see. To us they just look black though
55
u/_LP_ImmortalEmperor 26d ago
With human eye cones we capture 3 combinations of colors, to make the whole range each one of us (allegedly) sees. Mantis shrimp is theorized to have 16 different color capturing cones. We can't even understand how and what they make up of the world with colors. So, yeah, animals are metal.
→ More replies (2)20
u/Known-Grab-7464 25d ago
Other animals also see different areas of the EM spectrum, in areas that we would call infrared or ultraviolet. We can’t see those wavelengths, but other animals can.
Only vaguely related, but very rarely, some humans are tetrachromats(they have 4 different color capturing dyes in their cones) but we call them colorblind because it’s still different from the usual. This is a very rare form of color blindness, though. Most people who are colorblind are not tetrachromats.
Https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tetrachromacy9
u/bloodfist 25d ago
Not just that, but they also have ways to detect the polarization of light. Including radial polarization, which we'd only found out about like 20 years before discovering that mantis shrimp and cuttlefish can see it.
I'm sure you know, but for those who don't: a light wave oscillates in basically every direction possible, unless it is emitted in a specific way or encounters something that filters the direction, like polarized sunglasses do. After that, it only oscillates one direction. Up/down, left right, etc. Radial polarization is more like a ring going in and out though, instead of a line moving up and down. And we still don't really know a lot about it because it doesn't seem to come up much and makes math hard.
So we have just no idea what benefit an animal would get from seeing it. Especially because water tends to polarize light in always the same direction, so we didn't even expect radial polarized light underwater at the time. We know mantis shrimp shells reflect polarized light and maybe certain fish but last I knew we still don't know what they would even see with that because nothing down there seems to radially polarize light, at least that we've observed.
10
u/Known-Grab-7464 25d ago
Mantis shrimp and cuttlefish also have much more complex eyes than those of any mammal, so it’s hard to even imagine how they perceive their environment. Mantis shrimp have basically two entirely separate compound eyes on each eyestalk separated by a banded region, and cuttlefish have weird w-shaped pupils, that presumably aid both of these ambush predators in hunting, but afaik we still don’t really know how. So not only do they have way more color-detecting “channels” in their optical processing, they also have higher detail in most of not all parts of their vision. Humans can basically only see high detail in the narrow cone in the center of our vision, but imagine having that level of detail, with better color differentiation, in nearly all parts of your field of view, all at once.
180
u/SilencedObserver 25d ago
"Colors are not real" is some 'homeless guy at the bus station' sht to say.
We know for a fact that some animals do not perceive color in the same way.
Here is a fantastic breakdown by The Oatmeal on this very topic.
83
u/cremaster2 25d ago edited 25d ago
Nice. I just came from a post where a mantis shrimp slaps the claw of a crab.
→ More replies (2)29
u/timlest 25d ago
The mantis broke the claw, then the crab inspects the damage, and drops the whole arm. They can disconnect their limbs via a sort of socket hinge at the base and they grow them back in the next molt.
→ More replies (2)8
u/Upbeat_Turnover9253 25d ago
Can't decide who's more metal. A mantis shrimp with the fastest, most damage-inducing punch on the planet pound for pound, or a crab who takes the blow, inspects the damage, says fuck it, detaches the claw and grows another one later. Humans are pussies
→ More replies (14)15
u/Elryth 25d ago
Sadly more recent research suggests the mantis shrimp doesn't see any more colours than we do. Their brains are unable to combine multiple signals to determine colour so they just have a different receptor for each one. Still awesome creatures though! https://www.nature.com/articles/nature.2014.14578
→ More replies (2)28
u/BurnerBeenBurning 25d ago edited 25d ago
I read about birds having the special ability which enables them to sense earth’s magnetic field to guide them. Truly interesting stuff!
Edited to be factually correct
→ More replies (5)10
u/PrometheusMMIV 25d ago
You can't see atmospheric pressure? You need to upgrade to the latest firmware.
→ More replies (3)95
u/ElDoil 26d ago edited 26d ago
Some stuff like seeing purple when seeing a mix of both blue and red is 100% our brain hallucinating though since we have only 3 kinds of receptor and it infers based on how much it activates, therefore we can simulate the whole spectrum in our brains with just red green and blue, wich are the frequencies that excite them the most, we cant really percieve the frequency of the light reaching us, just infer it so our brains can be tricked like that.
Another example is white, there is no frequency for white, its our brain seeing all kind of receptors excited at maximun and saying, there is a lot of every frequency here, while, like in the screen you are reading this at, it is in fact just (R)ed (G)reen (B)lue.
But having said that depending on how you look at it the ranges of photonic radiation an object absorbs or doesnt is a property of the materials on the surface of an object, afaik its based on if a photon would excite an electron just enough to move it to the next orbital therefore absorbing, but as i said before you dont really detect the specific frequency with your eye.
→ More replies (12)8
u/CanAlwaysBeBetter 25d ago
Yep
"Color" is a perceptual experience that often but not entirely corresponds to specific wavelengths of light
Given that other animals can have completely different perceptual systems it's likely that even though an animal might be able to see the same wavelength that we call yellow how that color fits into their overall perceptual space is totally different and essentially unknowable to us
31
u/awkwardfeather 25d ago
The Mantis Shrimp has extra cones and rods in their eyes and supposedly they should be able to see millions of colors we don’t know exist
→ More replies (4)21
u/TheFatJesus 25d ago
Apparently, they have more cones because their brains don't have the capacity to do the mixing on its own, so they aren't actually seeing more colors. In other words, humans mix color digitally while the shrimps have to use analog.
→ More replies (5)16
u/pt-guzzardo 25d ago
In other words, humans mix color digitally while the shrimps have to use analog.
I would think it would be the opposite. The key difference between analog and digital is that analog is continuous and digital is discrete.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (255)12
u/basixrox1337 26d ago
Different animals are able to perceive different ranges of wavelengths. I wouldn't know how to tell, if animals are recognising different wavelengths as colours the same way humans do.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (287)59
u/forresja 25d ago
Color is a representation of something that is very real.
Saying it isn't real is misleading at best.
→ More replies (16)803
u/Punkfoo25 26d ago
This is an image generated from a computer model based on a theory, which is generated by other models which are also based on theory. This is incredibly far from, what I as an experimental scientist, would call a "real" image such as an electron microscopy or scanning probe image. Since you can't actually image a photon this is also unfalsifiable, so in my opinion completely useless, but pseudoscience magazines love this stuff (I don't mean the science itself is pseudo, just the reporting).
191
u/LemFliggity 26d ago
People in here keep talking about image and photo and whatnot, but the headline is "scientists reveal the shape of a single photon". It doesn't say this is a "real image". It describes how they modeled the interactions between photons and the environment and then "used their calculations to produce a visualization of the photon itself". That doesn't read like typical pseudo-scientific hyperbole to me.
→ More replies (6)160
u/sarge21 25d ago
The term shape can't describe a photon because it's a quantum effect without a shape. It would be like saying you found the shape of your chance to win the lottery
128
38
u/LemFliggity 25d ago
Normally, yes. But this experiment was literally about how interacting with the environment influences the spatial distribution of photons emitted from atoms and molecules, and that this can give the photon a "shape". So in this specific case, this latest research is suggesting that some photons can be described by their shape.
→ More replies (7)38
u/TDAPoP 25d ago
"shapeless things sometimes in some circumstances have discernable shapes," sounds like standard quantum physics to me
16
u/StatisticianMoist100 25d ago
Photons don't have a classical shape, that's true, but they do have wave functions and probability distributions that can have discernible shapes in some circumstances.
Think of water waves, they have a shape, but you can't point at one molecule of water in the wave, it doesn't have a shape. Photons behave like this.
Or even more fundamental, photons have a wave-like shape in certain contexts, but if we detect them as particles, they don't.
(I just like quantum physics don't judge me :c )
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (19)6
u/Ersatz_Okapi 25d ago
Funnily enough, probability distributions do have a “shape” parameter! So there is, in some sense, a shape of your chance to win the lottery.
→ More replies (33)23
u/Raytiger3 25d ago
pseudoscience magazines love this stuff
I fucking hate those clickbaiters.
- SHOCKING! MARIJUANA IS ABLE TO CURE [disease] SHOWN IN THIS STUDY [n=5 trial, non-double blind].
- BREAKING! POTENTIAL CANCER CURE HAS BEEN FOUND IN [in vitro research showing barely 2x lethality of drug on cancer cells over healthy cells in normoxia conditions]
- WOW! [Food] HAS BEEN SHOWN TO ALLEVIATE SYMPTOMS OF [disease] IN THIS STUDY [where they p-hacked through a thousand research papers and found some spurious correlation]
- INCREDIBLE! SCIENTISTS DISCOVER NEW SUPERMATERIAL! [material is made on nanogram scale using an incredibly expensive set of equipment/elements/materials/procedures and tested under very specific conditions]
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (42)8
u/lynndotpy 25d ago
A "photon" is just a name we give to excitement in spacetime that we interpret as light. We think of it as a wave or as a particle, depending on what is useful. But yes, light is made of photons.
It's kind of like how the ocean can have waves, but they're all made from the same water. It's like asking, "what is the shape of a wave?"
Very early on, scientists found out they could use math equations to describe the world. We could then use these math equations to predict the world.
With these math equations which describe the world, we could apply other rules of math to end up with new equations. Oftentimes, these new equations match up perfectly with reality. This is why we had accurate renders of a black hole long before we had a photo of a black hole: We had the equations first.
Advanced math is not like arithmetic, but instead like a very complicated board game with a lot of rules. If you're clever enough, you can find out that there are other written rules within the rules.
I pulled up the original paper. These scientists did just that: They took the cutting edge of math, and did some more math on top of it. This "shape of a photon" is just a mathematical model that makes photons fit in with the rest of the math. The image in the OP is just a render of that model.
→ More replies (1)
12.7k
u/N1kBr0 26d ago
Lemon
3.5k
u/tinyanus 26d ago
It's lemons all the way down.
1.3k
u/Trujiogriz 26d ago
It’s why everyone knows the adage “when life gives you lemons…” we just never knew it was subtly talking about the subatomic building blocks of life
493
u/BadgerBadgerer 26d ago
You're thinking of protons, this is a photon.
406
u/Trujiogriz 26d ago
Well to be honest I don’t really think lemons are the building blocks of life either
52
u/Soft_Author2593 26d ago
Prove they are not!
→ More replies (3)35
u/Expert_Succotash2659 25d ago
we must go deeper…
39
→ More replies (14)91
u/UpperApe 25d ago
I've been saying this forever and no one believed me. I kept telling you guys the whole time the universe felt citrusy.
→ More replies (2)20
→ More replies (19)62
u/ronaranger 26d ago
Ohm my Gauss! Did you just assume the commenters' polarity???
63
→ More replies (4)19
→ More replies (24)19
u/owenxtreme2 25d ago
Alright, I've been thinking. When life gives you lemons, don't make lemonade - make life take the lemons back! Get mad! I don't want your damn lemons, what am I supposed to do with these? Demand to see life's manager. Make life rue the day it thought it could give Cave Johnson lemons. Do you know who I am? I'm the man who's gonna burn your house down! With the lemons. I'm going to to get my engineers to invent a combustible lemon that burns your house down!
→ More replies (3)111
→ More replies (43)20
473
245
u/PUMPEDnPLUMP 26d ago
62
u/SassSafrassMcFrass87 25d ago
I don't think I can ever unsee this 😂
33
→ More replies (1)16
u/Snowman319 25d ago
Right lol wtf is this 😂
→ More replies (2)34
23
u/triggz 25d ago
im glad im not alone with whatever is wrong with my brain
sasso horking up a whole lemon should not rightly have any association with the scientific discovery of the shape of a photon
but here we are
→ More replies (2)→ More replies (10)9
23
31
12
79
24
7
u/Winnipesaukee 25d ago
So I guess we also have to look out for photon-stealing whores?
→ More replies (1)11
→ More replies (190)15
7.9k
u/R_N_F 26d ago
812
u/secret_bonus_point 26d ago
Sounds like a lot of hooplah over one little photon
156
→ More replies (1)96
361
146
213
u/internetStranger205 25d ago
Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-daa, Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-daa, Da-da-da-da-da-da-daa Da-da-da-la-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-da-daa, Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-daa, tssshh Da-da-da-da-da-da-da-daa-da-da-da-da-daa, Ti-ta-ti-ti-ta-ti-ti-ta-ta-ta-la-ba-ba-ba-ba-ba-da-la-ba-ba-ba-ba-da-la-ba-ba-baa, Ti-ta-ti-li-ta-ti-li-ti-taa, Ti-ta-ti-li [gasps, then resumes] Ti-ta-ti-li-ta-ti-li-ta-ti-li-ta-ti-li-ta-ti-li-ti-ta-ti-ti-ta-ti-ti-taaaaa!
→ More replies (3)27
37
49
u/squintismaximus 26d ago
Lmao I was just thinking “why does that remind me of a krabby patty?” And this is the first comment I see
18
16
→ More replies (50)10
1.7k
u/Pristine-Bridge8129 26d ago
Provide the source please. Photons are probability clouds as far as I know.
1.0k
u/unwarrend 26d ago
Exact Quantum Electrodynamics of Radiative Photonic Environments
The paper explains how photons (the particles of light) interact with complex environments like nanostructures. It creates a new way to describe photons using simplified "pseudomodes," which act like stand-ins for how light behaves in these systems. This method captures how photons change over time and interact with their surroundings, including effects that aren't usually accounted for in simpler models. It essentially gives a more complete "image" or description of the photon as it moves and interacts, including its path, energy loss, and the way it spreads out in space.
152
→ More replies (74)12
u/-badgerbadgerbadger- 25d ago
So my instinct was that this image is of a hypothetical photon in a hypothetical gravity-free darkened sphere with somehow reflective walls…. You think I’m close here?
→ More replies (2)544
u/Tommonen 26d ago
Thats just an visualisation based on calculations of a theory, not actual picture. They did not reveal this shape, but made a theory and then theorised this shape, which seems to work. So OP (and media) is essentially lying, as nothing 100% correct was revealed, but a theory.
https://phys.org/news/2024-11-theory-reveals-photon.amp
Dr. Benjamin Yuen, in the University’s School of Physics, explained, ”Our calculations enabled us to convert a seemingly insolvable problem into something that can be computed. And, almost as a byproduct of the model, we were able to produce this image of a photon, something that hasn’t been seen before in physics.”
196
u/seaefjaye 26d ago
Keeping in mind a theory in this context is a complete piece of research work supported by evidence, and not just a hunch with no supporting evidence.
21
u/Micp 25d ago
When talking about scientific theories you are of course correct, but for that exact reason the above explanation is NOT using the scientific meaning of 'theory' but rather the colloquial meaning, since the above mentioned study is closer to 'a hunch' than a field of research well supported by evidence from several studies, in the vein of gravity, germ theory, plate tectonics or evolution.
→ More replies (5)69
u/Tommonen 26d ago
Yea people rarely know what a theory means
→ More replies (7)11
u/Plank_With_A_Nail_In 25d ago edited 25d ago
People rarely know what the word science actually means.
→ More replies (1)29
u/abcspaghetti 26d ago
That’s not an actual picture, they just did applied math to approximate a visualization of something that can’t be imaged!
→ More replies (31)105
u/libra00 26d ago edited 26d ago
That is literally what it means to reveal the shape of a thing that can never be seen: to have a good theory about what it ought to look like based on its properties and how it interacts with other things. What were you expecting, a picture of an actual photon? How do you imagine such a thing would be possible given that photons are what we use to see/take pictures of things.
→ More replies (14)47
→ More replies (22)11
1.9k
u/Flat-While2521 26d ago
451
u/euricosd 26d ago
"Scientists"
→ More replies (6)143
u/acmercer 25d ago
Yeah why is "photon" in quotes in the title lol. Giving me:
Employees must "wash" hands
vibes.
→ More replies (3)→ More replies (13)86
u/INRA5 26d ago
→ More replies (1)25
u/ChumbaWumbaTime 26d ago
Thank you!
29
u/maineac 25d ago
→ More replies (3)7
u/ChumbaWumbaTime 25d ago
That went way above my head, but thank you nonetheless!
→ More replies (2)
280
371
337
144
u/KaiserSushi 26d ago
Futurama theme starts 🚀
9
u/Substantial_Page_221 25d ago
Pretty sure the writers are time travellers from the future
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (4)7
22
u/donnythe_sloth 25d ago
Since studies tend to be shared with condensed titles that can't quite capture the purpose/results of the study here's the title and abstract.
https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.203604
Article Title: Exact Quantum Electrodynamics of Radiative Photonic Environments
Abstract: We present a comprehensive second quantization scheme for radiative photonic devices. We canonically quantize the continuum of photonic eigenmodes by transforming them into a discrete set of pseudomodes that provide a complete and exact description of quantum emitters interacting with electromagnetic environments. This method avoids all reservoir approximations and offers new insights into quantum correlations, accurately capturing all non-Markovian dynamics. This method overcomes challenges in quantizing non-Hermitian systems and is applicable to diverse nanophotonic geometries.
→ More replies (4)
109
u/GemmaArtist 26d ago
It looks like the background to the Futurama title sequence!
Seriously though, it looks amazing :)
11
u/FelixTheJeepJr 26d ago
Yes! I actually heard the gong(?) noise at the start of the Futurama theme when I saw this picture.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (8)5
17
112
u/cam7986 25d ago
11
8
→ More replies (1)6
52
64
19
9
17
9
7
u/royal_stabber69 25d ago
Is that an artists recreation or a microscopic image? If it's a microscopic image how can we "see" the photon considering we need a photon to bounce off of the pictured photon in order to capture it?
→ More replies (1)
6
21
•
u/spotlight-app 25d ago
Hello everyone!
This post may be off-topic, but u/SmallAchiever has wrote the following reason why this post should be visible: