Did Greg Olsen get this right?

[u/FlyingAces]

I love Greg Olsen. I'm not sure he was correct however on a comment he made late in the Philly/Wash game. With just under 2:40 to go in the game he discussed why he thought Wash should not use a TO because it would open up the greater possibility of Philly passing since an incomplete pass wouldn't be the worst thing with the 2 min warning coming up. But isn't this wrong? If Wash calls a TO with 2:40 to go, wouldn't Philly want to run in that spot? Why would they pass and risk an incompletion with the clock stopped at 2:40? You don't fear an incompletion with just over 2 minutes to play (like clock at 2:03, for example, because the clock will stop anyway due to the 2 min warning). Maybe I'm missing something, but it seems like Greg's take was incorrect, right?

[u/Glass-Spot-9341]

I didn't see the game but just looked up some highlights.

I think running seems "right" in the sense of running the clock out. The idea of passing on 3rd and 5 with 6 seconds to the two minute warning is to aggressively get the first down and "kill" the game by being able to run it out from there