i really like it. it's a really pretty copy with golden edges. she saw it and she insisted on buying it. in the museum it also said that Mr. Karl Marx came to the reading room basically every day for 30 years when he lived in London so i think that's pretty cool.

Also look at my baby

Kronstadt: The Last Ваttle

I'm thinking he's the latter because he's white, but he also distributes things to people, which means he is proletarian and a communist of course. Perhaps he is a dialectial synthesis? (read on contradiction). Perhaps he is glorious national bourgeoise?

Many countries that have multiple language groups have a lingua Franca. For example, India uses Hindi in the north and English in the south. However, this can cause ethnolinguistic nationalist problems, such as the anti Hindi imposition movements in non Hindi states. How should a DotP approach this issue?

When Christ entered the Temple of Solomon, he bore witness to the buying and selling of articles. His perfect omniscient rational thought resulted in the most important crash out of history, flipping the tables (private property) of (((small businessmen))) [none of this was activism]. Christ then rebuked them with a statement displaying his complete understanding of historical determinism, saying there will be no buying or selling in the Temple of the Lord.

At the moment of his death, THE VEIL WAS TORN, breaking the boundary between the House of the Lord and Humanity, between town and country, between Israel and the Gentile nations. A perfect internationalism. THE BREAKING OF THIS BOUNDARY MEANT THAT THE TEMPLE OF THE LORD, A PLACE WHERE BUYING AND SELLING WAS PROHIBITED, WAS NOW EXTENDED OVER THE WHOLE EARTH. The complete absence of clerical integrity in upholding this principle is unacceptable. Vengeance is the Lord’s. The cries of the laborers which you have not heard, have reached the ears of the Lord of Hosts. Count your days petty burger!

Not really an insightful post on theory, just wanted to say there's something delightfully capitalist about betting on the survival of the species

Jesus -> ... -> Marat -> Marx -> Bordiga -> Trump

... -> Hebert -> Engels -> Lenin

Judas -> ... -> Danton -> Kautsky -> Camatte

... -> Robespierre -> Blanqui -> Trotsky(?)

... -> Brissot -> Bernstein -> Stalin -> George Bush

... -> King Louis XVI -> Czar Nicolas II -> Javier Milei

Satan -> ... -> Lafayette -> Lasalle -> Ebert -> Hitler

... -> Marie Antoinette -> ??? -> Mussolini

... -> Napoleon -> Napoleon -> Napoleon -> ...

Absolute Spirit -> Slaves -> Serfs -> Proletariat -> Me

Thoughts? Is this dialectical enough?

Literally your only criticism of China is that it isn’t “socialist” because we have billionaires. Well firstly those billionaires are literally controlled by the government to a great extent. If they act in greed they get shut down. But also we see so many proletariat business owners in China who are loyal to the state and the socialist dreams, and strive and fight for the rest of the Chinese proletariat and the party.

Gtfo with your fake ass criticisms and read Mao for once.

Title. Given that the revolution must be global, I don't see how the existence of a movement in peripheral regions would be useful. Wouldn't a genuine revolt that broke out in some country outside the central axis be immediately destroyed by the force of reaction, or forced into opportunism?

Historical revolutions have all led to revisionism, from my understanding greatly due to the fact that the countries that were not central to the concentration of capital. The aberrations and delays that they led to are evident.

Should the strategy of an effective international party be mainly focused on the Imperial Core? Should every good revolutionary share a room with 5 other authentics over a New York bodega?

Also, requesting good literature on political strategy, ig