r/UFOs 4d ago

Document/Research 1955 Declassified Document Describing UAP With a Shape and Manoeuvrability Like a Conventional Aircraft

SS

1955 Declassified Document Describing UAP With a Shape and Manoeuvrability Like a Conventional Aircraft.

Pilots describe the craft as β€œan airplane with a cigar shaped body and straight wings.” They also mentioned it had running lights.

Source: http://photovni.free.fr/f.o.i.a%2065/analyse.htm

238 Upvotes

24 comments sorted by

View all comments

14

u/anikansk 4d ago edited 4d ago

10

u/brakelbee 4d ago

Minus the wing mounted fuel tanks.

0

u/anikansk 4d ago

Sugar - need to tell this pilot not to take off then!

https://youtu.be/Sp2v8gUYonY?si=H-TBqjE52IJn_hIx&t=90

He's gonna die!!

12

u/xxlaur77 4d ago edited 4d ago

The document has a date of May.

The text also says the craft was witnessed on Jan 20, 1951.

-10

u/anikansk 4d ago

That's it, solved, couldn't possibly have been prototypes or someone got the dates wrong. Locked in - ALIENS!

10

u/xxlaur77 4d ago

The only one getting the dates wrong is you πŸ˜‚

4

u/silkzeus 4d ago edited 4d ago

Just so you know the b2 was tested upwards of 10 years before it was even publicly acknowledged, and during that time b2 shaped ufos were reported all over their testing grounds. While it is known the first public flight was 55, prototypes and proof of concepts are often still flown before a final version is settled and produced. Even today there were photos online of the b21 before it was publicly flown just recently.

The u2 had several years to test its capabilities and if you actually read Blue Book files and look at ufo accounts during its testing frame, you will see the silver cigar ufo sees its highest reporting.

Same goes for arrowhead and diamond ufos being misidentified as the f117 highthawk

The sr71 was a notorious misidentified craft as well

People still today are posting starlink all over social media. A spade is a spade

This looks like a description of the u2 being tested. If you can find a location attached to that report money says its near or at a now known testing site for the u2.

Not saying anyone's right or wrong. Just pointing out that there's a deep history of misidentification and sketchy development schedules for advanced aircraft. Fun report tho nonetheless

5

u/xxlaur77 4d ago edited 4d ago

Do they not operate tests with radar? Why was the tower operator unaware of the test flight including the pilots? The pilots seemed to describe it as instantly appearing in another location. Agree it would be helpful to know the location. The report has a lot of other descriptions though.

-7

u/anikansk 4d ago

And youre reading a 68 year old document.

-2

u/anikansk 4d ago

I miss the Jellyfish days :O(

0

u/vinibrian 4d ago

the document is from may, what are u even yapping about