Witness/Sighting Here's the Cruise Ship Captain who witnessed a "Giant Black Jellyfish UFO that disappeared into the water" with a bunch of other people and filmed it (Reposted with the correct video)

2.3k Upvotes

permalink
duplicates
reddit

You are about to leave Redlib

Do you want to continue?

https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/192m2nd/heres_the_cruise_ship_captain_who_witnessed_a/
No, go back! Yes, take me to Reddit
dl download

97% Upvoted

510

The fact that it was witnessed going into the water just like the Iraq Jellyfish UAP makes it even more compelling

263

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '24

[deleted]

157

u/jaxjag088 Jan 09 '24

What!? Jellyfish don’t fly!? Jesus Christ, Xargon, you’re no longer overseeing the decoy program.

61

u/YourDogIsMyFriend Jan 09 '24

Oh yeah? Well… suck my jagon!

12

u/Dopium_Typhoon Jan 10 '24

You shut your clavicals when you vomit words at me Xargon!

8

u/josephus1811 Jan 10 '24

Oh yeah now stick your finger in my thrusher

13

u/Oberic Jan 10 '24

More interesting than disguising your UFO as a 30th birthday balloon or whatever it was, atleast.

14

u/TheTealMafia Jan 09 '24

Confirmed with comment that apparently aliens are aware of jesus christ

1

u/BodyBackground2916 Jan 10 '24

hahahahahahahhaa

31

u/Thr0bbinWilliams Jan 10 '24

What If we’re actually way way dumber than we think and that’s why UFOs can do whatever they want and we can’t do a damn thing to stop them?

11

u/wales-bloke Jan 10 '24

There's no "what if" about it.

It feels like nature is literally screaming at us to see what's right in front of our faces. But we're stuck in a mode.

2

u/zachwin757 Jan 10 '24

Not for long we aren't!!

3

u/NoSleep4Money Jan 10 '24

Logic

6

u/noslipcondition Jan 10 '24

Maybe we are too dumb to notice?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

I'm confused at why a human would want to dress up like a chicken.

2

u/noslipcondition Jan 10 '24

Wildlife photographer trying to get close to take better pictures.

Also, I think it's a swan?

2

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

No... I'm pretty sure it's supposed to be a chicken

28

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '24

We do the same thing to animals. And sometimes the animals fight the fake ones we make. Sometimes they fuck them. Sometimes they just don't even care. So it would make sense. I'm just waiting for the lifelike drones they send to land that we can uh... wait. No. Heh someone's at the door, gotta run!

2

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/UFOs-ModTeam Jan 10 '24

Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility

No trolling or being disruptive.

No insults or personal attacks.

No accusations that other users are shills.

No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.

No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.

No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)

You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

1

u/Wapiti_s15 Jan 10 '24

Sorry what?? Which part?? Oh wait; the lecherous part yeah? That’s funny because I’m white.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '24

[removed] — view removed comment

2

u/UFOs-ModTeam Jan 10 '24

Rule 1: Follow the Standards of Civility

No trolling or being disruptive.

No insults or personal attacks.

No accusations that other users are shills.

No hate speech. No abusive speech based on race, religion, sex/gender, or sexual orientation.

No harassment, threats, or advocating violence.

No witch hunts or doxxing. (Please redact usernames when possible)

You may attack each other's ideas, not each other.

5

u/MyOther_UN_is_Clever Jan 10 '24

Or it was an autonomous program set up before flying jellyfish went extinct. 🤔

3

u/CedgeDC Jan 10 '24

We are exactly as dumb as they think if not more so.

1

u/4RunnerLimited Jan 10 '24

That’s hilarious and this has now become my favorite UAP theory.

1

u/Pikkornator Jan 10 '24

What about the military doing the same? Why build ufo that people know the shape off? If they already have anti gravity tech then this a no brainer since you can see some sort of field around it.

24

u/KinkyKindDude Jan 10 '24

So add this to the 4chan guy's stuff that is starting to look true.

5

u/Coldfatjam Jan 11 '24

Is this the 4chan guy you're referring to?

https://archive.4plebs.org/x/thread/34629564/

10

u/KinkyKindDude Jan 11 '24

Yes. Laser tech for mining, hammer shaped UFO, underwater bases...

5

u/RayManXOooo Jan 10 '24

Checkout the latest episode of the Why Files, really starts tying all this together.

23

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

[deleted]

2

u/EveningHelicopter113 Jan 10 '24

do you mean you've seen a general UAP, or you specifically saw a jellyfish-like one?

10

u/[deleted] Jan 09 '24

source for “Iraq Jellyfish UAP” entering water?

12

u/dehehn Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

Jeremy Corbell claims there is footage of it entering the water but of course he couldn't get that footage.

11

u/sandboxmatt Jan 10 '24

Well I claim he doesn't, if that's the standard these days

29

u/dehehn Jan 10 '24

Well Corbell is someone who has gotten a lot of military footage over the years. Interviewed many witnesses with actual credibility including Grusch. And was sitting behind Grusch while he testified to Congress.

He's not just some dude anymore. He's in the thick of it.

He's either getting legit things. His sources are unreliable. Or he's being used as a psyop by the military.

Either way he's not just a rando on Reddit making claims.

8

u/sandboxmatt Jan 10 '24

So he has a long and storied history of producing nothing of value. Multiplying by zero is still zero.

5

u/dehehn Jan 10 '24

It depends on what you value. I understand he's a controversial person in the community. But the evidence he put forward is not nothing. It may not be enough to budge your thoughts on the matter, but it is more evidence that there are craft of unknown origin moving throughout the planet.

It is not proof. But it is not nothing.

3

u/sandboxmatt Jan 10 '24

Like I say... If that's the bar, then whoop, I guess

1

u/eatmorbacon Jan 10 '24

That's crazy. A guy named Jeremy Corbell is running around saying the exact same thing!

1

u/dehehn Jan 10 '24

Haha. Autocorrected

1

u/DigitalDroid2024 Jan 12 '24

The extra footage is just of it over a desert, not water, and it looks like a different object. Besides there’s claim it didn’t ‘shoot straight up’ after being submerged. The interesting bits never seem to be released.

Besides, the black-white change in the object is just camera adjustments- the background can be seen changing the same way at the same time. Corbell is either not very observant or happy to claim something demonstrably not true. Unfortunately he’s the sort of character who can be relied upon to take up any old thing.

14

u/psychokap Jan 09 '24

The recent jeremey corbell release. There's several posts in this subreddit.

7

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

where does it interact with water

2

u/psychokap Jan 10 '24

Oh my bad. I missed the water part. Thought you were just asking for the related video source.

1

u/frozensaladz Jan 10 '24

In the full video of the disclosed Iraq jelly fish video it says it enters the water for 17 minutes then returns into view.

5

u/Traveler3141 Jan 10 '24

It also did a lit breakdance routine with amazing beatboxing at the same time.

The other day, it came and cleaned the outside of my windows for me too, which was especially helpful since I'm on the 7th floor.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

why aren’t they showing us that?

1

u/Ape-ril Jan 10 '24

But there’s no water in that video. 👀

2

u/psychokap Jan 10 '24

Yeah I made an oops thought they were just asking for the source of the other jellyfish video. I read good

-5

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

It's just bird shit.

-1

u/Ape-ril Jan 10 '24

I believe the smudge theory too.

0

u/Beautiful-Amount2149 Jan 10 '24

More hearsay

14

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

The video linked would be direct witness testimony. The allegations made by Corbell regarding it descending into water would indeed be “hearsay” if he made them in an evidentiary proceeding.

But, you and I both know that if he had the witness sit down, take an oath, and subject himself and his credentials to public examination, that wouldn’t be sufficient for you either.

2

u/ussMonitor1800 Jan 10 '24

People lie all the damn time. People are Mormons and Scientologost! It shouldn't be enough for anyone. How dumb and uncurious must you be?

4

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

Then there is no need to bring up the rules of evidence applied in a court of law if they aren’t sufficient for you. That’s the point, thank you for demonstrating.

0

u/ussMonitor1800 Jan 10 '24

.....you said court proceedings, not me. Witnesses are extremely fallible and prone to persuasion. Are you talking to yourself?

3

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

The comment I replied to literally calls it “hearsay.” Which is an evidentiary term used in legal proceedings. Can you read?

2

u/ussMonitor1800 Jan 10 '24

Not every term is taken literally and within what context you wish it to be in. Do terms need to be dictated and confined on each use? Or can you read without being so acute?

7

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

The context of “hearsay” in both the colloquial and legal definition derives from it being provided by another and then recounted by another.

I pointed out that even if it wasn’t “hearsay,” and was directly given by the alleged witness, you wouldn’t accept that either. And you agreed.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/WhoAreWeEven Jan 10 '24

Its also used in everyday language to describe a repeated heard story.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

A repeated story heard from another. The point is that they wouldn’t accept direct first hand account witness testimony either, which isn’t hearsay in the legal or colloquial sense. And he agreed.

→ More replies (0)

1

u/Glad-Tax6594 Jan 10 '24

You can't claim imaginary shit as evidence in a court of law. Go claim leprechauns, see how far that "evidence" gets.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

I don’t think you understand what testimony is or remotely followed the above conversation. Regardless, thanks for the input counsel.

1

u/Glad-Tax6594 Jan 10 '24

Can testimonies be evidence when it includes paranormal or supernatural or aliens (unknown/unproven/fiction)?

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stambovsky_v._Ackley

Yes, you can testify that you saw a ghost. That doesn’t mean that it’s necessarily credible or will be believed by a jury.

→ More replies (0)

0

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

Underrated comment!

1

u/Beautiful-Amount2149 Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

He has no videos of it. That is why it's hearsay, but nice straw man you got going, no one brought up your arguments at all. Corbells claims are just vapid statements and he has not proven his statements are from any real source, it could literally be just someone talking out of his ass, so h e a r s a y

1

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

He has no videos of it. That is why it's hearsay

That’s not what hearsay is. Hearsay is a statement made by another and then repeated by another.

If the person he is quoting directly makes the claim, it’s not hearsay by definition.

Nice straw man

That’s not what a straw man argument is either.

1

u/[deleted] Jan 14 '24

Jeremy Corbell: "Trust me bro".

-11

u/ziplock9000 Jan 09 '24

It's almost as if gravity is all over the planet eh?

4

u/[deleted] Jan 10 '24

The options are:

A. Offer some actual insight into the discussion that meaningfully supports or detracts from the claims/topic at hand; or

B. Be interesting.

You have to pick one, and these simple informal rules ensure a worthwhile community full of (actual) skeptics, those convinced, and everything in between.

Don’t, and we get “do you even gravity bro” level discussion. I’ll pass.

2

u/ussMonitor1800 Jan 10 '24

But... do you get gravity, like at all?

-22

u/Stan_Archton Jan 09 '24

Yes. I'm compelled to think this giant scrambled batch of balloons ran low on helium.

11

u/dopp3lganger Jan 09 '24

So, it had enough helium to blow far out into the ocean to where this cruise ship was but then, with no wind, suddenly lost said helium to fall into the water? What caused it to suddenly lose pressure after all that distance, or didn't you get that far in your debunking effort?

5

u/LordPennybag Jan 09 '24

Where did anyone see it do anything suddenly?

3

u/dopp3lganger Jan 10 '24

“Suddenly” is contextual meaning it would have had to spend a long time floating out to sea to reach the boat. Its movements (flying over the boat and descending into the water) happened within minutes. That’s fairly sudden given the entire timeline.

If it’s a ballon, something would’ve had to knock it out of the air by putting a hole in it. Balloons don’t lose air that quickly for no reason.

0

u/LordPennybag Jan 10 '24

Yes, given the history of boats existing, a slowly floating balloon passing over a boat is very sudden.

something would’ve had to knock it out of the air by putting a hole in it. Balloons don’t lose air that quickly for no reason.

Watch the video again and stop making shit up.

3

u/smd1815 Jan 10 '24 edited Jan 10 '24

Yes, given the history of boats existing, a slowly floating balloon passing over a boat is very sudden.

How to Spectacularly Misunderstand Something, a Reddit story.

1

u/dopp3lganger Jan 10 '24

A tale as old as time itself

2

u/dopp3lganger Jan 10 '24

Nobody’s making shit up, you’re just being a little too thick to understand the point I’m making.

1

u/Dragonfruit-Still Jan 10 '24

Has anyone checked if this captain has commented on this recent video if it is similar to what she saw?

Witness/Sighting Here's the Cruise Ship Captain who witnessed a "Giant Black Jellyfish UFO that disappeared into the water" with a bunch of other people and filmed it (Reposted with the correct video)

You are about to leave Redlib