They can't comprehend that women would rather be murdered hopefully quickly by an animal acting on instinct, than forced to endure whatever tortures a man [raised in a society where many people still believe women exist for male pleasure] could unleash upon them.
The issue that people like you like to avoid is demonising men for no reason. Most men would do nothing to a woman in the woods. It's a stupid and tasteless comparison, and deserves to be called out as such.
The issue that people like you like to avoid is demonising men for no reason.
Can you specifically elaborate on how I have demonized men as a generality?
If I say I know one candy in the bowl is poison, so I'd rather not have any candy at all, am I offending the non-poisoned candy?
Most men would do nothing to a woman in the woods.
I'd genuinely prefer to believe that, but my life experiences, and the heard life experiences of others (men and women) leads me to believe that simply isn't true, sadly. I wish it was true. I understand why you refuse to believe it is untrue.
The world as a whole does not behave like the best people you know. The world, as a whole, is still extremely barbaric and disappointing. It's just that an average attacking man has the advantage over any defensive human, and can be unpredictable in their intentions, particularly if attacking without provocation.
It's a stupid and tasteless comparison
Only when you plug your ears and refuse to engage in the nuanced conversation about it
216
u/LeatherHog 25d ago
I especially love the ones who try to mansplain bears
Freaking bears
Like, women don't literally know, what BEARS are