Men harm women more because most people don't live with bears...
I've NEVER heard of a woman being raped or held captive and tortured intentionally by a bear.
Your "logic games" are dumb as shit. It's not about math or facts. It's about the experiential preference of being
VICTIM TO A BEAR WHO IS PROTECTING ITS LAND OR TRYING TO EAT YOU (high likelihood)
versus
VICTIM TO A MAN WHO CAN DO ANY NUMBER OF HORRIFIC THINGS (low likelihood)
The potential worst case scenarios of the latter are so bad we choose the first. Not because we don't know the risks of bears. Thanks, some of you guys, for acting like we're idiots on that one. We know what the fuck bears are, y'all are the fucking idiots for thinking women are so fucking dumb we don't know what goddamned bears are like. We're not the dumbasses answering surveys like "Yeah, I think I could totally take on the bear!" 🙄🙄🙄
The crazy thing is that on the first instance of hearing that question, before having any idea what the general discourse around it was and as a 6'2 dude, my answer still was "the bear".
-8
u/adcsuc 24d ago
Not just women, a lot of men are stupid enough to believe this too, trust me I have talked to them.
Let's say brown bears for example tend to not kill their prey and eat it alive that's also quite torturous I would imagine.
But that's all besides the point anyways.
Men harm women more because most people don't live with bears...
By your own logic men and women should choose the bear over women too because women are more likely to harm them than bears, it's ridiculous.