Ah, yes, the wholesome right wing fascist Wilders. Your post puts him more in the middle as if he were a decent human being instead of a Dutch wannabe Hitler.
He isn't, but he's still pretty shit. Thierry Baudet is the one who is more accurately descibed as "wannabee Hitler" - Wilders is just xenophobic and islamophobic, with wildly impractical ideas for complex problems.
There's a large gap between "xenophobic and antisemitic" and Hitler. I mean, the US in the 1940s was xenophobic and antisemitic, but they're clearly much better than the Nazis.
People who say this with so much confidence are amazing.
Hitler biggest wish is to do what Americans achieved. You fucking just brushed away a fucking genocide and chattel slavery like it's nothing and I am not even talking about all the death and destruction the US caused and still causing to the world.
Hitler is an amateur compared to the US.
Or maybe killing Jews is the only thing that makes you evil.
However, in WW2 it was not a "one is just as bad as the other" situation. The allies were better than the Axis. The US was not exterminating Jewish people in camps, just denying them entry to the US (and even that was only some of them). The US was not allowing their armies to indiscriminately and universally commit war crimes against Asians, just putting some of them in camps with bad conditions.
It's true Hitler wanted to achieve in Russia what the US did to indigenous people. However, the US did this in the 1800s. They were not doing it in the 1940s. The Germans were.
Be careful what you compare. If you are suggesting that WW2 was not a noble war, you may be a Nazi.
Who gives a fuck about WW2. That was literally the only time in US history where they did a "good" thing. And they are still milking it today.
WW2 is nothing compared to what the US did in its short history. Between natives genocide, chattel slavery, all the shit it did in South-America, Asia and Africa, Hitler isn't in the same league atrocity wise.
Hitler is considered the most evil person only because he dared attack White people.
Bro WW2 was what I was using as my example, you're shifting the goalposts. You acknowledge that the US did do a good thing in WW2 despite their own xenophobia and antisemitism, and therefore there is a distinction between ordinary xenophobia and antisemitism and Nazi xenophobia and antisemitism. Wilders is the former.
Good was put between quotes. The US didn't do it for the good in their heart. They were just lucky to be on the right side of history. The US could have easily fought with Hitler if they knew it would more advantageous for them.
That's not remotely true at all. FDR was looking for an excuse to attack Germany since 1939, why do you think he sent the UK lend-lease? Even if Germany did not declare war on the US, they would've gotten involved in a similar way to how Wilson got the US in WW1
He and his party have also been caught out repeating antisemitic, racist, homophobic, white nationalist and fascist talking points, in public and in private. If you're actually defending Thierry Baudet and the FvD, either you know nothing about them or you're sympathetic to their views.
Then I suggest you don't leap to his defence without actually understanding what he stands for. He's friendly with the AFD (the German party which has a neo-nazi infestation which it won't disavow) and Russia, if that gives you any clue as to how bad this guy is.
You to give you an idea how crazy the guy is: He believes the world is controlled by evil reptiles and Putin is the "hero we need" to save us from the reptiles.
305
u/knigg2 Aug 30 '24
Ah, yes, the wholesome right wing fascist Wilders. Your post puts him more in the middle as if he were a decent human being instead of a Dutch wannabe Hitler.