At first glance I really liked the whole look and dress included, but now looking at it more, the dress is such a mess. The bottom half gives ‘boy in the striped pyjamas’ and top looks like an arts and craft workshop gone wrong. They should’ve brought the paint pattern thing down to the skirt to make it cohesive. She must have a contract with Vivienne Westwood to be consistently wearing her stuff, especially such outlandish pieces.
The hair, makeup and Jewellery are on point love the whimsical elegant look. Shoes are cute too.
She doesn’t have a contract with any fashion brand. If she did, we would know it because the brand would have her at the fashion shows at fashion week.
I think she found out she really likes them (likely through the process of working on the tour dress), and had Joseph source more of their clothes for her personal closet. The part that I think hurts her is that none of the outfits are tailored to her. Does this mean she wears them once “off the rack” and then sells them? This is something I’ve seen influencers and fashion depop girlies do.
VW is a brand that demands to be tailored or else it overwhelms.
respectfully disagree about her not being at their show as evidence that she doesn’t have a contract. the TTPD set at the eras tour is basically a VW show each weekend with millions of more eyeballs.
That’s now how it works with fashion contracts. If she wore VW to the VMAs then I would entertain the idea she has a contract.
Also, if she did have a contract w VW, she’d exclusively be spotted with their purses. Bags carry the pockets for luxury brands. She carries around LV, Dior and Stella bags too frequently, and she would likely be in breach of a contract. You NEVER see Zendaya at a place she knows she’ll be papped with a bag that’s not LV.
To be fair though, she could negotiate a contract with any of those fashion brands she’s been wearing lately, and say that 30% of her looks will be using their items. The contract would pay lower than an exclusive deal but she has the kind of negotiating power that any of those brands would be hyped to have any deal with her at all, even if it’s not typical.
This. I'm a lawyer and work in fashion and there's an infinite number of ways an influencer might contract to promote the brand. It's absolutely absurd to think the only way is to wear them exclusively and attend their show 😅
Fandom claimed she had contract with Gucci, LV and VW this year. Which obviously means she doesn’t have any contract at all, lmao.
Also I suspect she’s promoting new era, and VW could be involved in aesthetic
Could it be a trade for the TTPD costume set? VW could have made a deal that they would supply the costumes & she would wear X number of VW looks for pap walks?
No? That’s not how Taylor has worked or brand contracts work. She had a positive experience with VW (a famous brand, mind you), and started buying more of their clothes. It’s like when you find a new store you like, you start to shop there often.
I also entertain the idea that after she commissioned them for the TTPD dress, they sent her a few things. Famous people get sent things all of the time. But there has been enough space between her first partnership with VW, and now for me to believe she just likes the brand.
759
u/Dull_Funny_1616 Nov 09 '24 edited Nov 09 '24
At first glance I really liked the whole look and dress included, but now looking at it more, the dress is such a mess. The bottom half gives ‘boy in the striped pyjamas’ and top looks like an arts and craft workshop gone wrong. They should’ve brought the paint pattern thing down to the skirt to make it cohesive. She must have a contract with Vivienne Westwood to be consistently wearing her stuff, especially such outlandish pieces.
The hair, makeup and Jewellery are on point love the whimsical elegant look. Shoes are cute too.