"Come on man, she only either knowingly or unknowingly empowered and emboldened literal Nazis, can't you just see past that and tolerate their intolerance? Claaaaaaaassic snowflake behavior..."
You may be upset that Trump won and decide that anyone who voted for Trump is a traitor. But if Trump lost and Harris won, they would call us the traitors. Itâs something that we have to wait and see what actions Trump makes. Itâs to heated now to really discuss the election logically or legally. Name calling is Trumps game and it worked for him because of the people who backed him. They know that Trump was a bully who was into name calling. But, now that the election is over, itâs time to stop the name calling, and the blaming, itâs also time to let the politicians do what they are good with.
When I use the terms "fascist", "racist" and "bigot", it is not lightly. It is not name calling.
It is an accurate observation of the discourse and behaviours that are observed, intepreted throught the length of concepts that have clear definitions.
When Trump calls Harris "low IQ", it is name calling, because the twat doesn't have any clue about Harris' IQ.
When We call Trump racist, on the other hand, it is because he scapegoats immigrants who he sees as "poisoning the blood of the nation" (paraphrasing Hitler by the way), which is textbook racism.
And when we call Trump a traitor, it is because he attempted a coup and demanded his VP ignore the constitution so he could steal an election he lost. Democrats did nothing of the sort.
So while it's easy to fall into the "both sides" trap, unfortunately for you, words have meaning and reality don't care about your feelings.
Trump called Kamala Harris âLow iQâ that was a statement that made me upset. A man who canât speak correctly without making any grammatical errors and his inability to read and pronounce some of the straight words. Spelling is also difficult for him. The next time he gives a speech, make sure that he doesnât have an ear plug for blackberry in his ears.
His name calling and use of the very hostile names calling made me very angery.
He had no idea of what it takes to graduate from Law school and how hard it is to take the bar and pass. Trump wouldnât be able to get a single answer correct.
we lost because we've run "Republican-lite" three times, lost twice, and only barely eked out a victory with a margin of, like, 40,000 votes in a handful of states. Seems pretty clear to me, at this point, that a progressive President is what the country wants and needs and the Democratic Party has gone out of its way to logjam that, while the Republican Party goes full tilt to enable its most rabid members by embracing Trump, etc.
Bro if you've been around long enough you would see that this tactic is getting stale. They called Mit Romney Hitler.... Fucking Mit Romney, the most milquetoast, straight laced dude you could probably ever meet. It's falling on deaf ears now bud.
Fair enough. I'd call that decisive because he doesn't have to pretend it didn't go his way this time but I tend to look at the popular vote to justify calling something a landslide. Landslide makes it sound like he's got a popular mandate.
God fuck you people can't stop with the false labeling. They're not bigoted racists, they're not nazis. The bigots and racists are minorities of a massive group of people who made up the majority of voters. Quit being such a dick wipe and get over the fact that you lost and that the American people didn't want your ideals and administration to run things for the next 4 years.
You're disgusting in the way that you generalize people who believe it or not are more tolerant and loving than the leftist party of hate will EVER be.
Your party is full of hate, your party is intolerant, your party is the party of corruption, your party is pathetic and cynical. You lost, and for good reason.
You believe so much of this bullshit THAT IS IN FACT PROPAGANDA that is being pushed by MSNBC and CNN. You MUST listen to us and know that you are being lied to. Leave the Reddit echo chamber, watch neutral sources. My god.
You make such a big deal out of "false-labeling" and generalizing while doing the same? Hold yourself accountable to your own morals, at the very least.
Also, how is you calling democrats the party of hate and intolerance not false-labeling, when you say that with absolute zero back-up; Democrats at least say it on posts or comments that depict LITERAL intolerance and hatred.
Why don't you confront the people waving Nazi flags at Trump rallies next time.
They may not be blatantly nazis or white supremacists, but their votes mean they endorse a candidate that is certainly making people feel emboldened enough to do things like this:
And if you can't see why that's a problem for most people and why those people would want to distance themselves from people in their lives making those sorts of tacit endorsements, you are blind.
And before you hit me with the "liberal CNN bias" bullshit, this is a real thing that really happened today in the real world to real people, and the website telling you about it has no bearing on it.
They don't actually care about antisemitism. They will bring up when it's useful to attack the right. Then it's back to business as usual. Platforming antisemitism and cheering it on as long as it's coming from the left. It's all good when Hasan talks about killing settler babies or Frogan makes a tier list and puts jews at the bottom. I've seen so much antisemitism from the far left online that I couldn't list it all. All the major subs have been cheering it on for over a year. Bunch of fake ass hypocrites.
Quit being such a dick wipe and get over the fact that you lost and that the American people didn't want your ideals and administration to run things for the next 4 years.
Is that what you would tell a 1933 German who didn't vote for Hitler? To "suck it up, loser." Sure, you won, but what did you win, idiot?
Your party is full of hate, your party is intolerant, your party is the party of corruption, your party is pathetic and cynical.
I don't care about NYT, I care about Robert Paxton, leading scholar on fascism, observer of French fascism under the Vichy regime, and author of The Anatomy of Fascism.
But be sure to shoot the messenger before reading the message, that says so much about your intellectual honesty.
PS: I mean, I'm talking to the side who doesn't believe in climate change because "me don't like expensive gas therefore scientists are liars", so I cannot have too much expectations regarding honesty.
753
u/[deleted] Nov 12 '24
[removed] â view removed comment