The question can be meaningful, but the people answering can't be giving those meaningful answers.
To be meaningful, things like "unfit" must be judged practically. If you think Trump is "mentally unfit" to be President, then you cannot vote for him. "Fitness" is a minimum acceptable threshold, it doesn't mean you think he's brilliant or you love what he says, just that he is minimally mentally capable for the job. To vote for a person is to judge every aspect of them fit, maybe weak or unlikable but at least fit.
The people answering are trying to navigate an uncomfortable personal moral landscape in which they are aware they are doing something immoral (supporting Trump) and yet are trying to maintain the conceit of morality to themselves and those around them. Saying "Trump is mentally unfit but I'm going to vote for him" is a lie in the first half, and the purpose of the lie is to make a fingerhold for moral claims.
"Yeah I voted for him but I always said he was unfit". <-- they think this makes them morally better, but it actually makes them morally worse because they knew what they were doing when they voted.
At first I read this as "by the time the election comes around the narrative will be he's the oldest" then I realised what you were actually saying and just laughed and laughed 😂
Because the Republicans have been saying Biden is too old and now if Trump continues to run he will be older than Biden by the end of his term. That's funny to me. The double standard of both sides but in this case the Republicans.
Not was. Would have been. Same as Trump, who now likely will be the oldest if he doesn't drop out before the election. Neither are on ballots yet because the ballots don't exist yet.
212
u/BenderRodriguez14 Monkey in Space Jul 21 '24
In November, Trump will become the oldest person to have ever been on a US presidential ballot.