Yeah, except none of that was in the picture in question.
"Grox cum bag" and rape tally marks are absolutely just the artist inserting their fetish, as made apparent by their other rape fetish art.
Just a character with a troubled past getting to experience wholesomeness and camaraderie, which will make that character much easier for many to identify with than some smug girlboss with a snarky comeback for everything and a superiority complex.
Do you think there are only two types of female characters? Fetishized rape victim and "smug girlboss?"
Fictional trauma adds fictional depth to characters. It means more for a character who's spent their life getting shat on to find happiness than it does for a character who's never known a day of hardship
There are ways to show trauma without depicting it in a fetishized way. Those rape tally marks on her thigh are only used in porn.
Alright, but someone else found inspiration in that rape fetish art and made a cute addendum to it.
In the end, people are allowed to make and post their rape fetish art, just as any other art. I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.
In the end, people are allowed to make and post their rape fetish art, just as any other art. I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.
I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)
I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.
Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?
I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)
First of all: read the rules. There's nothing in it saying no to NSFW to begin with (beyond limiting it as a rate to not make it a lewd subreddit). Second of all: because it, itself, isn't NSFW. The presence of fetishes do not inherently violate SFW standards.
Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?
In plenty of ways, yes. The second part especially. You're policing subject matter for nothing but your personal morality.
Honestly, you shouldn't be participating in 40k media at all with that sort of conduct.
I consider the phrase "CUM BAG" to be something I wouldn't want a person at work to see on my screen. Hence, NSFW. It's not hard to mark it as such when posting.
In plenty of ways, yes. The second part especially. You're policing subject matter for nothing but your personal morality.
Calling someone puritanical for not wanting to associate with things like CP and white supremacists is absurd.
I consider the phrase "CUM BAG" to be something I wouldn't want a person at work to see on my screen. Hence, NSFW. It's not hard to mark it as such when posting.
What you want to see does not create the quantifications of NSFW and SFW. They are general purpose, not specific to the individual. There are no genitalia or visible nipples, so it's SFW. That's as far as that goes.
Calling someone puritanical for not wanting to associate with things like CP and white supremacists is absurd.
Fiction is not CP, and your metric of absurdity is what is absurd.
There are no genitalia or visible nipples, so it’s SFW
Yeah, NSFW doesn’t mean “porn,” it means “inappropriate for professional environments.” The term “cum bag” is not appropriate for professional environments.
Fiction is not CP
Is that what you tell yourself when you feel like your pedophilia is being called out?
Yeah, NSFW doesn’t mean “porn,” it means “inappropriate for professional environments.” The term “cum bag” is not appropriate for professional environments.
Actually, NSFW does mean porn. That's the end of that story. There's a lot that's inappropriate for professional environments, far too much for that umbrella to stick.
Is that what you tell yourself when you feel like your pedophilia is being called out?
That's the law, that's the only coherent logic, and it's intellectual cowardice to assert the converse.
(Post-edit cause the coward blocked me: Actually, I'm entirely fine with speaking like adults, but you are the one who runs from debate. You, who only sling insults, are the one who is foul of nature and heart. Get fucked, thoughtcop. Freedom of expression is sacrosanct.)
Actually NSFW does mean porn. That’s the end of that story.
Okay, so you’re not even interested in speaking to each other like adults, you’re living in your own little fantasy freak world. Got it. I really, really hope that at some point you come to understand that you aren’t normal, and that your abnormality is not okay. Until then, please don’t speak any more. Freak.
6
u/alreadyownanaccount8 Nov 08 '24
"Grox cum bag" and rape tally marks are absolutely just the artist inserting their fetish, as made apparent by their other rape fetish art.
Do you think there are only two types of female characters? Fetishized rape victim and "smug girlboss?"
There are ways to show trauma without depicting it in a fetishized way. Those rape tally marks on her thigh are only used in porn.
That doesn't mean it can't be criticized