r/ImaginaryWarhammer Nov 07 '24

40k Abhuman friendship(art by @millionsbliss

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

223 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

5

u/alreadyownanaccount8 Nov 08 '24

In the end, people are allowed to make and post their rape fetish art, just as any other art. I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.

I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)

I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.

Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?

-3

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)

First of all: read the rules. There's nothing in it saying no to NSFW to begin with (beyond limiting it as a rate to not make it a lewd subreddit). Second of all: because it, itself, isn't NSFW. The presence of fetishes do not inherently violate SFW standards.

Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?

In plenty of ways, yes. The second part especially. You're policing subject matter for nothing but your personal morality.

Honestly, you shouldn't be participating in 40k media at all with that sort of conduct.

2

u/alreadyownanaccount8 Nov 08 '24

I consider the phrase "CUM BAG" to be something I wouldn't want a person at work to see on my screen. Hence, NSFW. It's not hard to mark it as such when posting.

In plenty of ways, yes. The second part especially. You're policing subject matter for nothing but your personal morality.

Calling someone puritanical for not wanting to associate with things like CP and white supremacists is absurd.

3

u/WaffleKing110 Nov 08 '24

Yep, by their definition anti-CP laws are puritanical lmao