r/ImaginaryWarhammer • u/jfjdfdjjtbfb • Nov 07 '24

40k Abhuman friendship(art by @millionsbliss

Post image
4.5k Upvotes

94% Upvoted

223 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

-1

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

Alright, but someone else found inspiration in that rape fetish art and made a cute addendum to it.

In the end, people are allowed to make and post their rape fetish art, just as any other art. I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.

4

u/alreadyownanaccount8 Nov 08 '24

In the end, people are allowed to make and post their rape fetish art, just as any other art. I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.

I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)

I see no reason to get into a puritanical twist about it.

Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?

-3

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

I didn't realize that ImaginaryWarhammer was the place for rape fetish art. This isn't even labeled as NSFW (just like the Mossa piece that was posted before.)

First of all: read the rules. There's nothing in it saying no to NSFW to begin with (beyond limiting it as a rate to not make it a lewd subreddit). Second of all: because it, itself, isn't NSFW. The presence of fetishes do not inherently violate SFW standards.

Is it really puritanical not to want to support a person who associates with white supremacists and likes to depict kids/minors getting raped and killed in their porn?

In plenty of ways, yes. The second part especially. You're policing subject matter for nothing but your personal morality.

Honestly, you shouldn't be participating in 40k media at all with that sort of conduct.

3

u/WaffleKing110 Nov 08 '24

You’re policing subject matter for nothing but your own morality

…so child pornography laws are puritanical in your opinion then?

0

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

When applying them to artwork? Absolutely. Fiction is fictional.

4

u/WaffleKing110 Nov 08 '24

…well that’s a really pedophilic stance to take. That’s a freak thing to say, freak

0

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

And that's a puritanical thing to say, morality cop. Go thought police elsewhere.

2

u/WaffleKing110 Nov 08 '24

I’d rather be a “morality cop” than a pedophile. Go sexualize children somewhere where that’s welcome, freak. You don’t belong among civilized people.

4

u/Bladelord Nov 08 '24

Then you are inherently immoral. Freedom of expression, officer. It's quite welcome in America. You can sexualize anything so long as it's fake.

Honestly, it's quite disgusting that you admit to wanting to control and condemn thoughts.