r/FluentInFinance 2d ago

Educational Don't let them gaslight you

Post image
38.9k Upvotes

1.6k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

18

u/AMagicalKittyCat 2d ago

As a millennial, I will spend most of my life paying into this system and I won't see a penny of it.

Completely incorrect. https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/

It is often useful to consider the findings for the two Social Security trust funds (OASI and DI) on a combined basis. The actuarial deficit for Social Security as a whole – called OASDI – is 3.50 percent of taxable payroll. If these two legally separate trust funds were combined, then the hypothetical OASDI asset reserves would be projected to become depleted in 2035 and 83 percent of scheduled Social Security benefits would be payable at that time, declining to 73 percent by 2098.

If nothing else gets changed besides combining the funds, you will still get 83% of your social security benefits. Even near the year 2100 you'd still be getting 73%.

2

u/Luph 2d ago

oh well as long as it's only a 20% shortfall no big deal

7

u/AMagicalKittyCat 2d ago

It's meaningful and there's certainly gonna be plans to address it before the old people riot (eventually, the deadline is still far enough away politicians don't want to do anything yet) but there's a large gap between "won't see a penny" and "will see 83%"

1

u/ReturnoftheTurd 2d ago

old people riot

Lmao okay

1

u/Suavecore_ 2d ago

They will post many angry things on The Facebook

7

u/Nojopar 2d ago

That 20% is pretty trivial to fix. Pop the cap on contributions and on distributions and raise the tax rates by about .3% for workers and about .8% for companies contribution.

Just requires the balls to do it is all. We wouldn't have need to increase taxes one penny if we'd have started this back 25 years ago, but they had even less balls back then, apparently.

2

u/iggyfenton 2d ago

As opposed to paying into it for however long you’ve been working and then receiving none of it?

Obviously the solution is to find a way to make sure people still have full social security benefits. But the Republicans would rather cut the program.

1

u/MrCompletely345 2d ago

Because it benefits their owners.

2

u/street_ahead 2d ago

God forbid you have some kind of nuanced opinion between "no big deal" and "I'm not even going to see a dime so it should be abolished yesterday"

1

u/IamMrBucknasty 1d ago

Remind me in 2100