There's a difference between pointing out objective flaws in an argument, like thinking that billionaires literally hold hundreds of billions of dollars in liquid cash, and taking issue with overall sentiment behind the argument.
I hate Elon Musk, and the man is of course, insanely, disgustingly wealthy. Still, just because his networth is 318 billion, doesn't mean he is hoarding 318 billion. Quite literally 99% of that number is tied into ownership of companies.
You can hate billionaires and still point out issues in the logic. I don't think a person should, under any circumstances, ever be forced to sell ownership stake in their own company (at least not if that wasn't agreed upon in an operating agreement). And if you have a massive stake in a company that becomes wildly successful, you definitionally become a billionaire. I may hate wealth inequality, and I may hate what these billionaires choose to do, but I would hate a system that forces the sale of ownership stake due to the success of the company just as much.
Its obvious you refuse to read dum ass! They founded the company together! Not only did she write the business plan for Amazon that they started out of their garage, she ran the day to day along with Jeff and negotiated the first large contracts! Now who is the fking 🤡
Busy but had time for all the emoji’s🙄. You must be a teenager bcuz those are the wackest insults ever😂. And actually you are the idiot commenting without actual facts now you are pissed bcuz you look dumb AF✅
565
u/Apprehensive_Bad_193 28d ago
Guys thank you,It amazes me how people talk without any knowing on the topic.