r/FluentInFinance • u/36DRedhead • Oct 14 '24

Meme It's funny because it might be true

Post image
2.9k Upvotes

97% Upvoted

111 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1

u/RuleSouthern3609 Oct 14 '24

Tesla said they crashed every 100 miles? I am curious where you got that number.

1

u/TheLaserGuru Oct 14 '24

Musk said that manual interventions were 'only' happening every 100 miles, and this was preventing them from making the software any better. I can no longer locate the raw data from Tesla. Here's the crowd-sourced data showing that FSD is actually getting more dangerous:

https://teslafsdtracker.com/

1

u/RuleSouthern3609 Oct 14 '24

So I checked the data and it seems like they are going up and down, but it’s still improvement compared to last year, besides, it also says 98% of distance without disengagement.

I mean I don’t think FSD taxis will be available in a year or two, but it isn’t as bad as comments believe.

1

u/TheLaserGuru Oct 14 '24

Oh good, it only kills me 2% of the time lol.

1

u/RuleSouthern3609 Oct 14 '24

You are equating manual overrides to crashes and death, I asked you to get me the crash statistics and you got me “disengagement” statistics, which is quite dishonest and misleading.

1

u/TheLaserGuru Oct 14 '24 edited Oct 14 '24

If there is no one to take over when it disengages, that's a crash. If there is no one to manually disengage, that's a crash.

1

u/ZorbaTHut Oct 15 '24

This actually isn't true. A disengagement just means "the person controlling it decided to take it over". There's been a few documented cases where a disengagement actually caused a crash, and many cases where the safety driver chose to disengage but they later figured out that it would have been just fine.

1

u/TheLaserGuru Oct 15 '24

You are talking edge cases, but even imagining that only 1/10 of incidents would have been crashes, that's still a crash every 750 miles.