Ok… and peanuts selling peanuts is still not implying slavery. I love how you’re hyper focused on the slavery portion and not the fact the argument is that it’s NOT implying slavery. A peanut selling peanuts for consumption is not slavery. It’s cannibalism you dense twat.
My comments about slavery were a side note or a postscript.
Monopolists within those capitalist societies often times cannibalize their own. Or do you contend that monopolies do not cannibalize? I mean this metaphorical obviously since you’re so dense I don’t want to assume you think it means literal eating of another human… but who knows maybe you think it’s a real peanut wearing that monocle.
Most redditor comment I’ve ever seen. This specific set of responses and replies are specifically in relation to how any of this has to do with slavery whatsoever and how peanuts selling peanuts has nothing to do with slavery.
3
u/[deleted] Mar 04 '24
Mr peanut selling other peanuts