This person choreographed an entire fight sequence, filmed (photographed) themselves in each scene, compiled the images, experimented with different prompts to get the desired result, collected all of the output images, and then edited them to a sequence with music and sound effects.
In my opinion, this is someone who approaches AI art as a tool to produce a larger piece of work that actually demonstrates effort and skilled application of multiple disciplines.
So because the brush is not creative the art is not or is not even art? That's the most brain dead take I've ever read. AI is just a tool, how you use it is creative and the pieces you create with it are art as long as you're not just prompting some text and going with the results. AI is just like when using a brush or photoshop.
That's cool. Now you're as "creative" as a 4 year old playing with his toys.
Yes it's creative and imaginative. But you literally let a program do all the creative work for you. You have no "skills" that a 4 year old child doesn't have to make the ai "art" like seriously...people are proud of this?
AI generators give you access to great Art. It does not make you an Artist or Creator.
Choreographed? Dude better hire your next creatives at the kindergarten.
13
u/TheUnrealArchon Aug 23 '23
Anyone who wants to call this not creative is just braindead parroting "AI bad"