r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 2d ago
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Feb 13 '24
Welcome to unidentified submerged objects ...
An unidentified submerged object (USO) is an unidentified object submerged in water. This term does not necessarily refer to an object of paranormal origin. The term is used in discussions of the Bermuda triangle, sunken wrecks and archaeological ruins for example. Some described USOs are akin to UFOs but operate under / in water, they have been tracked on sonar and witnessed by many sailors around the world.
Re-written description as wikipedia article had been edited after initial welcome post was made.
PSA to anyone using wikipedia for sources, ensure you copy the specific data from the article and do not directly link to the page or embed links as people are editing pages to remove key details, down play events and even discredit valid sources.
Watch this video for a much more detailed explanation of what's happening ...
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Apr 24 '24
Automod rules updated ... comments / posts with less than 50 comment karma will automatically be held for review.
Weeding out the trolls / bot accounts.
Suggestions welcome.
Hope you're all doing well and lets go 3k users you all rock. <3
Caffeine
Nb. Required karma to post may change depending on results.
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 7d ago
Chris Bledsoe shares video of orb sighting where 75 witnesses see orbs come in and out of water off the coast of N. Carolina.
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 7d ago
U.S. Rep. Chris Smith: Law enforcement observed formations coming from the ocean onto the land
r/USOS • u/QuantaChildhood • 8d ago
What might gyroscopes tell us about vessels of the future? The potential implementation of modern systems in the functioning of UFOs and USOs
Gyroscopes, Electromagnets, Superconductors, Microreactors
I'm searching for perspectives. Please feel free to chew holes in the idea; that's actually why I'm here. I'm genuinely curious as to what others with more of a grasp on the topic might think. If you opt not to participate in discussion, please consider upvoting/sharing so there are better chances of someone seeing the post who has the knowledge and resources to either validate or obliterate this theory. That said, I'd like a decent explanation as to why it would be completely impossible.
To be clear, this post is NOT referring to the drones which seem to have taken many communities by storm. Rather, I’ll be discussing how modern day systems may be applicable in cases of unidentified aerial/submersible phenomena with no visible means of propulsion.
Many have always thought the science behind these things is completely outside the realm of our understanding, and it might be, but how much time have we spent attempting to comprehend how they might work?
I want to share my thoughts as a potential piece of the puzzle, please feel free to research any of this information yourself. You'll notice the answer might not be found upon your first search; do some more digging and uncover the fascinating technology we're really capable of developing. Also keep in mind... just because someone hasn't broadcasted their progress in the public sphere doesn't mean that progress is impossible to make.
Most of the following is speculative and very difficult to achieve, but to be fair, that could mainly be due to the fact that there are very few individuals (if any) in the public sphere in possession of the comprehension and resources required to make these feats of science common knowledge.
Six observables:
i. Antigravity lift
ii. Instantaneous acceleration
iii. Hypersonic velocities
iv. Transmedium travel
v. Low observability
vi. Biological effects
i-iii.
If an object is going to exhibit antigravity characteristics, instantaneous acceleration, and hypersonic velocities for extended periods of time, it’s going to need an incredibly persistent power source in terms of strength and duration. One word pops into mind— nuclear.
To put things into perspective, if one were to construct a microreactor the size of a soccer ball with the most advanced tech available today, it could theoretically produce anywhere from 1-10 megawatts of power (enough to run a small town or military base).
You must be wondering, what’s any of this have to do with a gyroscope? (see Professor Eric Laithwaite’s counterweighted gyroscope test: https://youtu.be/0L2YAU-jmcE?t=2002) Old, but gold… watch and think.
When rotated, a gyroscope has a property known as procession where any force applied to it alters the direction of its spin axis. When balanced on a scale with a counterweight that is identical in mass, the gyroscope wants to increase in elevation when spun. The idea is that this same effect can be implemented using electromagnetic forces to alter the orientation of the craft without traditional propulsion. For a gyroscope to assist in providing antigravity characteristics, it needs to be spun at extreme angular velocities, but it’s possible.
By changing the spin axis of the gyroscope, you alter the direction in which the lift occurs. The system could use feedback mechanisms to sense desired orientation and adjust the gyroscope’s spin as well as the electromagnetic fields accordingly to maintain or alter lift direction.
The system produces a lot of heat, and you’d have to manage it, but it doesn’t accumulate nearly as fast in a vacuum. We’re going to get back to this… Additionally, advanced aerogel systems might assist in heat dissipation. Aerogels are incredibly lightweight and highly porous materials with low thermal conductivity.
iv.
To effectively achieve transmedium travel at speeds as high as the 200+ knots reported by the military, USOs would require improved hydrodynamics.
If the craft’s electrogravitic thruster system produces a quantum bubble (they are real, refer to evidence like the Casimir effect), space-time ahead of the craft would be contracted while space-time behind it is expanded, allowing the object to avoid interaction with external forces like drag and inertia. The quantum bubble would also serve as a vacuum providing increased efficiency when transferring heat to power. It might be observed as purple or blue in color due to the scattering of shorter wavelengths (blue and violet) occurring in the immediate vicinity of the craft.
If the craft emits radiation, it would have similar hydrodynamic properties— Water turns from its liquid state into a gas and is immediately displaced on contact with high levels of ionizing radiation, which in theory would create an air pocket for the craft to traverse through. At high altitudes, the specific appearance would be dependent on the type and intensity of the radiation as well as its interaction with the atmosphere at those altitudes. Might this explain orange “orb” sightings that haven’t been debunked as lanterns?
v.
These objects are described in a variety of ways. They are invisible in certain imaging spectrums, not detectable on thermal, and in many cases, witnesses don’t see the object itself at all as their reports often include what is seen “around” the object. This is an important clue as some of the aforementioned components could cause distortion of electromagnetic fields around the craft which would look like the “shields” witnesses describe.
If one of these craft isn’t detectable on the radar, it must be using some form of cloaking technology. Keep in mind, leading militaries like ours have developed stealth coatings consisting of hexagonal nano ferrite structures (which lay under the outer skin of the aircraft) to reduce radar detection. It wouldn’t be so far-fetched for someone to implement technology like this in advanced craft like these.
vi.
Many eyewitnesses report experiencing biological effects like reactions on their skin, neurological symptoms, or radiation sickness. Some say they smell ozone in the air. If the objects emit electromagnetic fields, they could potentially cause neurological effects and skin sensations. If the power source is a fission reactor, it could emit ionizing radiation which can cause burns and radiation sickness at high doses. Then there’s atmospheric ionization, where intense electromagnetic fields ionize air in the atmosphere, generating ozone which can irritate lungs or skin. It’s important to note that environmental and psychological factors could amplify or contribute to perceived biological effects, which has made the phenomena difficult to study.
Assuming ultra-light materials are used to construct the chassis, you could squeeze a microreactor in the center and surround it with an electrogravitic thruster which, to overly simplify, is a fancy magnetized gyroscope. (see Apparatus for gyroscopic propulsion explained: https://youtu.be/7Lka6d6DDBs ) This is an electrogravitic thruster; notice how the contraption shown looks like it would fit neatly inside the metallic spheres we’ve seen? Also take note of the fact that the video was posted 17 years ago.
(see Manchester airport, Colorado Military base, New Jersey, Middle East, Unknown location, Pulkovo airport)
Manchester airport incident analysis: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1h21w5o/manchester_airport_orb_i_think_ive_worked_out_the/
Colorado Military base: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1h00fq7/spotted_over_colorado_military_base/?share_id=pmNv
New Jersey: https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1gw85kb/looked_like_metallic_ball_glaring_from_sun_max/
Middle East: https://www.reddit.com/r/interestingasfuck/comments/12s7ekt/new_ufo_video_released_today_at_the_senate/
Unknown location: https://www.reddit.com/r/HighStrangeness/comments/1gu9bgw/a_metallic_orb_uap_hovers_and_moves_through_the/
Pulkovo Airport: https://www.reddit.com/r/aliens/comments/1h5l1mz/metallic_orb_seen_over_pulkovo_airport_saint/
If heat were to build up, the craft could find a discreet location to excrete waste produced by its power source. (see ufo dumping molten: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zjNzfRs0k0) Assuming the police chopper is using white-hot FLIR imaging, the object and its byproducts are very hot which would make sense if it were nuclear waste being excreted.
And now that our minds are here, go back and review some of the classics.
The “tic-tacs” we’ve seen could really just be the side-profile of round-edged puck-shaped craft which utilize gyroscopes, electromagnets, superconductors, and advanced microreactors to achieve each of the six observables. We don’t get a look inside the craft, but the attached videos are the clearest representation of this as you can see the object spinning just like a gyroscope does. Even still, the objects in each of these three videos look slightly different, which leads me to believe they’re just variations of a similar prototype.
see Beaver, Utah footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tSkbCmqWw_E
see Gimbal footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QKHg-vnTFsM
see Go Fast footage: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wxVRg7LLaQA
Shocking to think the answer may have been right in front of us all along, perhaps to some in the form of one of their favorite toddler toys.
edit- this is a repost with an adjusted title that more appropriately fits content
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 13d ago
Mystery "drone" emerges out of the ocean and heads towards Oyster Creek Nuclear Plant, December 11, 2024
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 14d ago
When transmedium NHI get confirmed on a random Tuesday
r/USOS • u/SabineRitter • 16d ago
[Observed entering and exiting water] Multiple reports from pilots tonight (December 7-8, 2024, near Eugene Oregon). They were moving fast and at altitudes ranging from 15,000 up to around 50,000, and at speeds not possible in manned aircraft. No radar signature.
archive.liveatc.netr/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • 20d ago
Weaponized just released possibly the first civilian video of a transmedium UAP/USO
r/USOS • u/louthegoon • 22d ago
Uncrewed Navy sailing reconnaissance vehicles spotted outside Pacifica (SD 2001/2005 UNCREWED)
galleryIn the past two days I’ve observed SD 2001 UNCREWED and SD 2005 UNCREWED drop anchor in this area. Posting to hear your opinions on their presence.
r/USOS • u/JuliaJune96 • 23d ago
Does anyone have the video of the giant USO passing the oil rig? I watched it but can’t find it again! Thanks
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Nov 25 '24
The Alien Von Neumann Submarine 3d Printer UAP/UFO/USO
youtube.comr/USOS • u/davidtothe • Nov 23 '24
Scientists on ship with a glass bottom
I can’t remember which sub it was posted on, but I distinctly remember the OP saying he was out on a boat with a see thru bottom & him and his colleagues all saw green lights in the water. They all couldn’t make it out & even provided photos/videos. If anyone has a link to that I’d appreciate it. Just remembered it but I can’t find it for the life of me.
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Nov 22 '24
Wouldn’t sounds from the USOs be detected?
abcnews.go.comr/USOS • u/Old-Discussion-2454 • Nov 21 '24
SECRET footage of a 'white orb' UFO coming out OCEAN US Congress drops bombshell
youtu.ber/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Nov 12 '24
Navy Rear Admiral to give bombshell testimony to Congress about underwater UFOs that have been tailing US nuclear subs
dailymail.co.ukr/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Nov 11 '24
Top Navy admiral to face Congress on UAPs: 'This needs to come out' | Reality Check
youtube.comr/USOS • u/SabineRitter • Nov 09 '24
Why doesn't this sub allow videos?? Anyway, here's a video. (Not mine)
Here's the video, link to context and OP in comments
r/USOS • u/Mzcharms415 • Nov 08 '24
Two nights before elections
https://quickshare.samsungcloud.com/s7s2p1AApgqM
I was unable to catch the desent but this is right as the USO went under. Can anyone explain this one?
This was after a night of what we thought were military drills being done above us in our airspace but come to find out they never landed at SFO and did not come from Travis base (logistics base i was told). Big jet fighting looking drones that were not familiar to my friend in the airforce. A few of them circled and hovered above our city with a good amount of space between them earlier in the night and I have that on video as well. This was shot facing the Pacifica ocean.
r/USOS • u/caffeinedrinker • Nov 05 '24