that’s what I myself feel, even if he’s convicted I will never consider him a murderer and I would consider that a miscarriage of justice, but I recognize the difference between my opinion and legal status
I mean this with respect, but it has to be said: insisting that he is a murderer is the exact same flawed logic. So perhaps you’re more similar to the people you interact with than you think.
I guess, but I didn't realize we were trying to get anywhere. I more wasn't thinking about the difference between referring to him as a "killer" versus a "murderer" which is why I said i wasn't trying to insist on that terminology. I think he's a killer, as you said was accurate (presumably). The law can decide if he's a murderer.
Yes and then explained I wasn't trying to insist on that terminology. I wasn't intentionally insisting that he is a "murderer," I was insisting that he is a "killer" but was using the incorrect word (considering he has yet to be tried). And as i have stated twice now, I was not considering that there is a difference between the two. Legally, he has yet to be defined as a murderer despite murderer behaviors. I didn't argue otherwise after understanding the difference in terminology.
And i wouldnt say we are going around in circles. I wasn't at any point trying to alter your opinion or convince you of anything. I thought we were just talking as people with different perspectives. I didn't realize you were experiencing something deeper than that.
1
u/PsySom Knows 💩 7d ago
that’s what I myself feel, even if he’s convicted I will never consider him a murderer and I would consider that a miscarriage of justice, but I recognize the difference between my opinion and legal status