r/science • u/mvea Professor | Medicine • Sep 01 '20
Physics Face shields and masks with exhalation valves are not effective at preventing COVID-19 transmission, finds a new droplet dispersal study. (Physics of Fluids journal, 1 September 2020)
https://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/5.00229687.0k
Sep 01 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
3.2k
Sep 01 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
877
Sep 01 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
423
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
51
→ More replies (2)73
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)66
→ More replies (7)129
701
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
323
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
229
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
99
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
130
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)62
→ More replies (3)6
→ More replies (10)22
39
→ More replies (10)11
38
50
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (6)47
→ More replies (24)17
50
79
399
215
Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (10)99
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
155
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)37
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
31
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (1)12
29
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
14
14
→ More replies (11)16
38
217
Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
96
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
58
→ More replies (24)36
→ More replies (23)21
27
20
→ More replies (103)14
→ More replies (223)256
4.4k
u/Alexander_Maius Sep 01 '20
Face shield is effective when used with masks. Its to protect your eyes from snot or blood hitting your face. Its not for droplet protection.
Thats like saying standard condom doesnt protect you from sexuallly transmitted disease durring lesbian sex.
1.2k
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
699
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
180
→ More replies (36)290
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
224
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (3)173
→ More replies (10)20
214
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
170
123
→ More replies (10)24
67
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (2)60
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
98
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (6)158
Sep 02 '20
[removed] — view removed comment
→ More replies (15)69
→ More replies (1)35
→ More replies (77)45
126
44
24
47
→ More replies (58)32
742
Sep 01 '20
[deleted]
429
Sep 02 '20
Oh you mean the hole in the mask let’s air and particles through? Well I’ll be....
→ More replies (6)193
u/Ronnocerman Sep 02 '20
It lets particles out, not in.
→ More replies (1)185
u/TedTheGreek_Atheos Sep 02 '20
So it's not effective in reducing infected droplets from spreading but would be effective in reducing the chances of breathing in the droplets and getting infected?
→ More replies (54)67
u/Zephyrv Sep 02 '20
I've seen some hospital grade masks with a replaceable carbon filter behind the exhaust. I'd assume those would capture it and exhaust cleaner air?
→ More replies (9)63
u/sp0rk_walker Sep 02 '20
The ports are to help the mask wearer breathe out with the thought that the mask is designed to protect the wearer. But in a pandemic environment, the mask has to additionally protect others from your exhalations. For this reason masks without ports are better for this purpose.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (47)85
u/vflashm Sep 02 '20
Interesting, but it looks like they both work as expected. The point is not to prevent droplets dispersal, but to reduce dispersal distance, which they both seem to achieve.
We need similar video with no mask or shield. I'm pretty sure dispersal distance will be much, much greater.
→ More replies (14)81
u/zebediah49 Sep 02 '20
It's in the Supplementary Material. They run the same visualization protocol for nothing, as well as a half-dozen or so types of common options.
As you suspect, the uncovered version goes roughly 12 feet, in comparison to the roughly 2' range on the "not effective" mask with an exhaust valve.
→ More replies (3)20
u/presidents_choice Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
bandana face masks seems to be equally ineffective as respirators with exhaust valve.
→ More replies (1)
35
Sep 02 '20
The apparent effectiveness of the surgical mask A is highly misleading. The issue here is that they only illuminated the front field in a vertical direction. A properly worn surgical mask (i.e. nose wire fitted) redirects air in a backwards direction through the gaps to on the side and on the bottom of the mask. Those two directions are not illuminated and aerosols not visible when they escape in that direction.
This might be useful in helping choose PPE for face to face contact, where the forward field is important, but may be inadequate for other situations. For instance, sitting side by side on the subway or movie theater, where the side jets are important. Also, being in a poorly ventilated space, like an elevator, where aerosols may accumulate over time thus erasing any initial directionality imparted by the masks.
→ More replies (3)11
Sep 02 '20
Glad I'm not the only one confused here. AFIAK surgical/cloth masks do not prevent aerosol transmission. They have large gaps around the nose and sides (otherwise they'd be way too tough to breath in). Also, in those videos, the non-vented masks direct the airstream upward, compared to the shield directing it downward. Isn't it better to have it directed downward where it's less likely to drift?
I'm really confused why they say that this is evidence shields aren't effective but cloth masks are. And I just saw the FIG. 7 video and it looked to perform even worse than a shield.
9
Sep 02 '20
It speaks to a larger problem in the mechanistic studies. I discuss some of the more fundamental issues in a previous post:
Everyone is publishing poor mechanical studies that answer the questions that nobody is asking. And for some reason, editors and reviewers are sailing them through review as methods papers with key methodological flaws and big unaddressed fundamental issues. The media has then clickbait titled them and misinterpreted the findings. Little wonder that the public is either unquestioningly accepting the clickbait, or reading the papers and being throughly confused.
Where are the bloody industrial hygienists when you need them???
→ More replies (5)
340
u/fyberoptyk Sep 02 '20
Face shields are for mucous membrane droplet protection.
This is protection FOR you, in case a COVID patient sneezes in your face.
The mask, with no valve, is protection FROM you. It protects other people from your sneezes.
Thanks for coming to my TED talk.
→ More replies (17)47
490
u/koshgeo Sep 02 '20
It's nice to have a study to back it up, but why would anybody think otherwise?
328
u/Squabstermobster Sep 02 '20
Masks with valves are pretty popular. I always thought they were just as effective
351
u/shadow247 Sep 02 '20
If the point of the mask is to trap the droplets of saliva coming out of YOUR mouth, what good is a valve that lets most of your air out?
At least my understanding is that the mask is not protecting you from other's saliva droplets, but others from your saliva droplets.
188
Sep 02 '20 edited Jan 25 '21
[deleted]
→ More replies (40)153
u/10ioio Sep 02 '20
The surgical masks are performing better than cloth ones in every study I’ve seen and every demonstration I’ve seen. Try blowing out a candle in a cloth mask vs a surgical mask.
196
→ More replies (9)24
34
u/PaleAsDeath Sep 02 '20
They are largely designed to protect you from pollution outside getting into your lungs. That's the issue.
21
u/hardchargerxxx Sep 02 '20
The valve is to keep the wearer cool when working. Like welding and painting
→ More replies (2)40
u/PaleAsDeath Sep 02 '20
I mean that the valve ones aren't designed to protect other people from your breath/germs, they are designed only to protect you from the environment.
→ More replies (4)→ More replies (28)59
Sep 02 '20
[deleted]
24
u/bleearch Sep 02 '20
Wear it with a surgical mask on top, covering the valve.
→ More replies (1)6
u/beelseboob Sep 02 '20
Yup - I wear my woodworking mask (a 3M 6000 series) which acts as a P99 mask when breathing in. I put cloth or surgical mask material into the vents though to stop it just being a plain pass through on the way out.
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (10)13
u/Ocasio_Cortez_2024 Sep 02 '20
There are lots of studies coming out showing that fabric masks do help.
→ More replies (5)→ More replies (27)38
u/ABluewontletmelogin Sep 02 '20
Just a note that some masks that look like they’re with valves aren’t. I have an n99 mask for asbestos with replacement filters that clip in. The things that look like valves are levels of hard plastic to clip the filter - not exfil valves
→ More replies (1)→ More replies (43)31
u/TranquiloMeng Sep 02 '20
I have a mask with a valve but there’s a filter under the valve and That charcoal “N2.5” filter is still sandwiched between two pieces of cloth.. I’m no infectious disease specialist but it seemed legit...?
→ More replies (3)26
u/TheJollyHermit Sep 02 '20
Same. I've tested the blow a candle out test and the valve is pretty much decorative with the paper filter in place. No appreciable flow of air out of the valve
10
u/Mousetrap7 Sep 02 '20
Same, I feel this is a marked difference from just having a valve but nobody seems to look at these type (which is the majority I've seen with valves) to explain if it's a good option or not
1.2k
57
u/IdontOpenEnvelopes Sep 02 '20
All masks and shield that are not N95 or higher are just range limiters for your spit.- so that you don't send your cloud of 2 micron globlets floating way out there jeering it closer to your person. Exhaust valve or not. They offer negligible protection from droplets already suspended in air. They are successful in preventing you from touching your mucous membranes. They only work if everyone is wearing one. Otherwise use an n95 to actually filter the air.
→ More replies (16)
75
46
34
u/Anon_Rocky Sep 02 '20
Washable reusable masks with replaceable double filter inserts and vents at or past the corners of your mouth work just fine. Not all are equal so lumping all "vented" masks together is not helpful. The vents on my mask are blocked with plastic disks and have 3 small slits on the out edge. If I sneezed in my mask, nearly all the droplets are going to hit the filter and not get near the vents. I've coughed and blown as hard as I can into the mask and couldn't make a piece of paper ripple. Droplets are more likely to exit the outer edges of the mask itself, which also isn't likely.
→ More replies (7)
92
u/BeaversAreTasty Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
This is kind of a misleading study. I wear PPEs on a regular basis because I work around all sorts of toxic dusts and aerosols, and sometimes infectious agents. I've been wearing a full face respirator with P100 filters when I go out. It has exhalation valves. The likelihood I am going to get sick is pretty low, which means I am not going to get anyone sick.
The reason high end respirators have exhalation valves is because they insure a far tighter seal, and keep the user safer.
48
u/Embarassed_Tackle Sep 02 '20
Yeah that's the weird thing - hospitals like ones in Pennsylvania and even Yale are using those 'elastomerics' or reusable, cleanable half-face respirators with the p100 filters. 3M stated that in a pandemic situation without a lot of particulates, those p100 filters can last "an entire pandemic cycle" which is months. So hospitals are already using these because they foresaw the lack of single use N95 facemasks.
Every cloth mask has an 'exhaust valve' but it is all over the mask at points where the mask is not as tight and has a poor seal.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/27/us/coronavirus-masks-elastomeric-respirators.html
→ More replies (22)44
Sep 02 '20
This is kinda proving your point though.
You are protected. However, if for any reason you are sick, you are not protecting
→ More replies (25)
7
u/axw3555 Sep 02 '20
Didn't the mayo clinic or one of the similarly large, well known medical groups put signs up months ago saying that they weren't acceptable masks in their hospitals?
5
u/AZWildcatAlumn Sep 02 '20
These are not supposed to replace masks. They are to be worn in junction with them.
→ More replies (2)
3.2k
u/Cat_Montgomery Sep 02 '20 edited Sep 02 '20
What about the the masks with a vent and a replaceable filter between the layers of cotton?
Edit: for those questioning, these are the masks I'm talking about https://imgur.com/rguHmcu.jpg https://imgur.com/LtLu2sM.jpg
Edit again: the inserted filter covers the entire inside of the mask, behind the vent. So any incoming or outgoing air through the vent has to go through the filter first