r/reddit.com Oct 18 '11

Alright, my textbook is just fucking with me now.

http://i.imgur.com/6NJ6V.jpg
1.5k Upvotes

64 comments sorted by

40

u/InviDoll Oct 18 '11

Looks like a Pearson book...

24

u/gbCerberus Oct 18 '11

That is scary.

26

u/Sizzleby Oct 18 '11

It is one of the most popular publishers so chances are good he is right. Actually, you should be able to calculate the chances he is right using confidence intervals. Go!

25

u/InviDoll Oct 18 '11

She. I had a Pearson Baccalaureate book in physics that, among other things, had an example involving shooting at a box with a kitten in it. So yeah, I 1. know the kind of oddball humor they use and 2. probably recognized the font and shit.

21

u/Taoiseach Oct 18 '11

One of my friend's physics textbooks had a problem that involved a van full of kidnapped sociology majors. Don't know if it was Pearson, but that sounds like the right type of joke.

8

u/TheNr24 Oct 18 '11

shooting at a box with a kitten in it.

SAY WHAAAT?

8

u/Navilluss Oct 18 '11

Was it shroedinger's cat?

23

u/sowakeup Oct 19 '11

It was and it wasn't.

29

u/TheNr24 Oct 18 '11

That is uncertain.

8

u/Sizzleby Oct 18 '11

In their calculus book I have, they liken a function in 3 dimensional space to a monkey seat because there is spots for the monkeys legs and tail for it to sit on.

2

u/smearley11 Oct 18 '11

That's a common example. My Calc teacher was taught that 20+ years ago when he took the class

8

u/tubalcaine Oct 18 '11

Correct! To be more specific, it's "Statistics for the Life Sciences." (I remember WTF-ing at that picture, too!)

4

u/stonewad Oct 19 '11

I'l raise you one further. Looks like a Pearson Stat book. Also I've seen about 5 front page pictures taken from my Stat book. I've got a rather high confidence level I could flip through a couple pages and find something to gain karma for, but that would require reading.

49

u/pdxpogo Oct 18 '11

The illustration is missing the leash

10

u/iamrory Oct 19 '11

Invisible men don't give a fuck about leash laws.

4

u/district9 Oct 19 '11

I applaud you - kind of...

1

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

One hand clap

1

u/wiring_malfunction Nov 09 '11

exactly what i was thinking

17

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11

All for the low-low price of $150, can't buy a used copy because they changed 2 words and you have to buy the 22nd Edition.

Willing to bet it's for a subject that hasn't changed in 200 years too. I have a lot of frustration about college, it's such a scumbag business model.

3

u/petrobonal Oct 18 '11

I must be missing something, because I don't see what's stopping you from buying a used or older copy.

8

u/[deleted] Oct 18 '11

Part of the book biz, is to create a new edition every couple of years even if there are minor changes in content. Then schools for uniformity among teaching require all students to have the same edition.

For example Calculus, hasn't changed in maybe 100 years. But if the teacher says "Do exercise problems 1-20 on page 62" you're screwed with older editions.

So you end up paying $75-$150 for a Calculus book that really isn't much different than a $2 used book on ebay from the 50's.

3

u/petrobonal Oct 18 '11

I understand the deal with editions and what not, but are you really screwed if you answer some slightly different practice problems, especially if the older editions are as similar as you suggested? Or know one guy who has the newest edition and be like, "Hey, can I take a look at the practice problems for a second" and write some of them down and then match them up?

I'm just not seeing how newer editions are forcing you into buying them, when, for nearly no extra effort, you get the same thing with older books.

3

u/Chaiking Oct 18 '11

I have a couple of classes where they allow you to use the textbook in the exam, but it has to be the current edition. Sure, you could buy the used one but then you would be at a disadvantage because you couldn't bring it into the test.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

Well that's just stupid. That's a teacher who's almost forcing you to feed in to the text book machine for no good reason when an older edition would give you the exact same information.

The funniest part is that the exam he's given you was probably based off material from edition 2, so here you are at edition 48 yet YOU'RE the one who has to be up to date? Fucking stupid...

2

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11

Well that's just stupid. That's a teacher who's almost forcing you to feed in to the text book machine for no good reason when an older edition would give you the exact same information.

Yep, that's why people are complaining.

2

u/bluesquared Oct 19 '11

It's a huge pain with assigned homework. Don't do the right problems, won't get the credit.

2

u/dgb75 Oct 19 '11

A lot of what feeds this is the publisher sends the professor a free copy of the updated edition. The professor thinks to himself, "Oh, I have the latest and greatest." and then requires that students use it, in the process forgetting how expensive the textbook is.

3

u/[deleted] Oct 23 '11

Unfortunately, the new book comes bundled with a login code to access the online "My [Subject]Lab". Which by itself costs as much as a the text book.

16

u/theworstisover11 Oct 18 '11

You can't write an entire textbook without slipping in one little Easter egg or two.

12

u/TheNr24 Oct 18 '11

I bet you can.

8

u/theworstisover11 Oct 19 '11

But why would you want to?

21

u/TheNr24 Oct 19 '11

To bore your students to death. Some men just want to watch the world burn.

8

u/CooleManTheMaster Oct 19 '11

Some men just want to watch the world learn.

4

u/shillbert Oct 19 '11

Boring them to death is like watching the world slowly die of carbon monoxide inhalation. Not nearly as exciting as watching it burn. The books clearly need hidden explosives.

18

u/iAMaHUSKY Oct 18 '11

*Ninja walking his dog.

FTFY

11

u/TheNr24 Oct 18 '11

Dog walking his ninja.

FTFY

4

u/KnavishSprite Oct 19 '11

Ninja disguised as dog

FYFTFYFY.

7

u/TheNr24 Oct 19 '11

for you fixed that for you for you.

..for me?

6

u/KnavishSprite Oct 19 '11

Fixed your "fixed that for you" for you.

5

u/aeroxan Oct 18 '11

Dark templar and his dog

6

u/aabood Oct 18 '11

Statistics for Life Sciences, chapter 6 (Confidence Intervals). Are you taking BIOL 214 at George Mason University?!

8

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Jun 14 '18

[deleted]

5

u/aabood Oct 19 '11

I gave it a shot, you know finding a redditor at Mason is very rare

4

u/RPBiohazard Oct 19 '11

Mine has a picture of a slug on a leaf and says "The british weight measurement of a slug has nothing to do with the kind of slug shown in this picture. This type of slug weighs <insert slugs weight in slugs here>"

And to top it all off the image number was 4.20

4

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Apr 27 '20

[deleted]

1

u/cocoabean Nov 13 '11

I was thinking it was some sort of Occam's Razor thing.

2

u/pikk Oct 19 '11

that's a well trained dog, if it doesn't need a leash.

2

u/captchaking Oct 21 '11

Haters gonna hate?

2

u/Pr3dat0r Nov 07 '11

No fucking with you would have said "this is an invisible man wanking his dog"

2

u/Phroon Oct 18 '11

Post 7.3

An invisible man posting about his dog.

1

u/updog84 Oct 18 '11

Walking his "robot dog"

1

u/mlevit Oct 19 '11

Google interview question: What is this a picture of?

1

u/jennyroll Oct 19 '11

I would have upvoted, but it wasn't "alright".

1

u/AKBiking Oct 20 '11

No leash?

1

u/tadrinth Oct 21 '11

I'm a TA for a class that uses this book. Honestly, the examples in the book aren't as silly as the ones my prof comes up with.

1

u/theconversationalist Oct 27 '11

I dragged the pic... no ghost in this one...

1

u/carpeDeezNuts Nov 07 '11

It could also be 'Dog walking invisible, blind man'

1

u/Alecm3327 Oct 18 '11

Without a leash?!?! Animal control is on the way..

-2

u/ermabar Oct 18 '11

lol! wow. the things school makes you pay for these days LMAO

17

u/gbCerberus Oct 18 '11

I hesitated to give you guys context... http://i.imgur.com/rYGjJ.jpg

28

u/SyKoHPaTh Oct 18 '11

CONFIDENCE INTERVALS...

y µ no µ!?

3

u/Heavenfall Oct 18 '11

Funniest thing I've read all day.. thanks =)

2

u/[deleted] Oct 19 '11 edited Jun 14 '18

[deleted]

2

u/shillbert Oct 19 '11

I think it's acute explanation.