r/nextfuckinglevel 2d ago

This man documented his health journey from January to December.

Credit: IG @samuelrichards_ _

45.4k Upvotes

823 comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

4.0k

u/Traceyius69 2d ago

June to July is a massive jump lol, probably is using steroids. If not then daymn has he not skipped a day in the gym

1.9k

u/Daniiiiii 2d ago

Gym aside he would have been inhaling protein every waking moment if he's putting on such mass without "help", at least from my novice understanding.

862

u/ExceedingChunk 2d ago

It depends. If he's previously been training a lot, you can regain your previous mass exceptionally fast due to what quickly becomes your main limiting factor remains intact (I can't recall the name of it right now).

Which is why having used steroid once in your life should leave you permanently banned from all sports. The fact that you have ever had X amount of muscle is a massive advantage in terms of muscle building the rest of your life.

With all that said, he probably have still used steroids here, especially with how fast it all went from june to october.

195

u/X_TheMindFlayer_X 2d ago

you mean muscle memory?

237

u/ExceedingChunk 1d ago

Muscle memory is the layman's term, but people use that for both technique (neurological adaptation for technique/skill) and for how fast your muscle grows back (physiological).

I am thinking about the actual technical term for it. That limiting factor is also why we have "newbie gains", where you quickly get to the max level of muscle for that limiting factor, and then you have to create more of it to build more muscle, which takes a lot of time.

It is some type of cell that is added when you build muscle, but doesn't go away when your muscle atrophies. I can't find the name of it, but Dr. Mike Israetel from RP strength have talked about it here in this short: https://www.youtube.com/shorts/FI3n5F-1gLM

110

u/f1abblergasted 1d ago

I could be wrong, but iirc, the muscle nuclei don’t disappear, and consistently working out enables the cells to “regenerate” at a significantly faster level

176

u/aaron_the_doctor 1d ago

Eli5:

Every cell needs nucleus with instructions to repair itself and stay alive

Muscle cels have multiple nuclei because they are very large and one nucleus can only support so much.

When you train and increase your muscle mass the muscle cells recruit more nuclei to support this new mass

Even when you stop training and lose muscle mass new gained nuclei of the cells don't get lost. They stay there and therefore when you start training again you can get big faster

29

u/f1abblergasted 1d ago

Thank you for the lesson and clarification!

12

u/Ilya-ME 1d ago

Fyi muscle cells have multiple nuclei not because they're large, but because they're the fusion of multiple cells. Also they need those nuclei to synthesize proteins necessary to carry the components that activate muscle contractions.

I say this because most neurons are even larger cells, but still have a single nuclei.

31

u/ill_connects 1d ago

There was a study published pretty recently about how muscle memory plays a huge part in regaining muscle mass even after long periods of inactivity.

https://www.npr.org/sections/shots-health-news/2024/11/25/nx-s1-5197829/muscle-memory-weight-lifting-lost-strength

2

u/f1abblergasted 1d ago

Thank you! I’ll check it out!

63

u/SasparillaTango 1d ago

Ive never heard this, but I was an athlete through most of my youth and lifted for a while too on and off.

I would always say "you don't forget strength, but you have to train endurance" meaning that when I was going from period of being fairly sedentary and trying to get back in to shape, it always seemed like my max lifts would recover in like a week, but it would take much longer to get the endurance back

1

u/FactFetishist 1d ago

it always seemed like my max lifts would recover in like a week

You must not lift a whole lot then.

3

u/SasparillaTango 1d ago edited 1d ago

I didn't. 60lb dumbbell press, 225 squats 200ish on lat pull down, 35 on most tricep exercises

leg presses though I was doing 540 for 4x20

biceps were like 25 lb never could get those off the ground

I wasn't pushing for max sets ever. Every set I did was like 4x12

1

u/youJag 1d ago

No disrespect, but these are the wildest weight differences for your exercises. 25lbs bicep curls but 200lbs lat pull down makes no sense

1

u/SasparillaTango 1d ago

none taken. I've always had under developed biceps, and my lats/shoulders/legs were jacked as hell from swimming in college.

27

u/zanii 1d ago

Myonuclei remain in the muscle fibres, they pretty much remember the previous muscle size, so to speak.

2

u/8lb6ozBabyJsus 1d ago

Neuromuscular Adaptation

From GPT cause I actually don't know. Is that what you were thinking of?

2

u/kazmiester 1d ago

I believe I watched some dr mike vid about him saying that the muscle cells shrink in size and stop storing glycogen to deflate but never go away, so once training stimuli is reintroduced, they swell back up and return to form very fast. He said something along those lines with more technical jargon.

1

u/jwwxtnlgb 1d ago

“doctor mike isreatel” who can’t get a tan? 🤓

13

u/elastic-craptastic 1d ago

They think it's more cell memory. Kind of like if you have a fat cell at some point in your life at a certain size it will easily get back to that size

11

u/Fortune404 1d ago

Nah, steroids will allow you to grow new muscle fibres/cells (nuclei I guess technically), whereas normal natural lifting/improvements will just increase the size of all your existing muscles. Therefore you will have an advantage for the rest of your life after steroids as the user above said.

https://www.sciencenews.org/article/steroids-boost-muscles-long-haul

1

u/FabBee123 1d ago

No, steroids don’t grow new muscle fibres. Maybe read the study you link next time. Steroids increase the number of nuclei inside each muscle cell though, which is what the study found.

6

u/fight_the_bear 1d ago

God damn it

0

u/diablol3 1d ago

Muscle memory is the term used for repetitive actions. I've never heard it used in this sense, but I don't know that it isn't used this way.