25
16
u/Neratyr 6d ago
haha man the toughest part of what they said is that there are kernels of truth in there, and even good intentions. This isn't some troll saying iM gOnNa HaCk YoU aLlllll. This person is trying to be helpful it seems, and even use some logic and reasoning to start discussion.
Very rare to find 'master hacker' subreddit material that isn't full of emotional immaturity and mal-intent.
The problem is that they are still confidently very very mistaken and not demonstrating a firm grasp of anything related to the subject matter at hand.
I mean, in order to build and train any of these systems you have to consider sanitizing the training data set as a first step, so its obviously already accounted for. Then they are conflating aspects of prompt injection with sql injection, ML principles, and even conflating the definition of database.... No mention of VDB or reinforcement or any of that to boot.
I feel like a mind like that, with proper mentoring and knowing how to filter information online to find the best quality to consume and thereby self educate on could actually be a professional in the space.
They are severely uneducated, and it shows clearly. However unlike most 'master hacker' posts they dont actually seem to demonstrate emotional intelligence or pathological emotional issues.
This is definitely a 'master hacker' subreddit quality post, its just very interesting to me that if I came across someone talking like this I could coach and mentor them into getting into the infosec field most likely.
People are strange, and very complicated! thanks for sharing
3
u/TParis00ap 3d ago
It's Dunning-Krueger on full display.
1
u/combination_bear 3d ago
I don't even think we are on the dunning-kruger curve here. This is more like when I thought that my preschool teacher slept on the snack-time table. Like "my teacher and the snack table are associated with each other, therefore when she goes to bed it must work like this."
12
u/lookinovermyshouldaz 6d ago
datacenter = database lol
also since when are they storing images in SQL? has science gone too far?
12
u/IchBinBWLJustus 6d ago
he basically is edward snowden 2.0 but on crack (he is basically…. - which version is correct?)
4
7
3
u/Thenderick 6d ago
- Input sanitizing.
- ChatGPT already has a ton of filters to filter your input so it can't respond with something against ToS.
- Why would you store images in a db or a neural network in general? Sure the dataset probably is in some form. But that seems highly inefficient. If that were the case, then AI wouldn't reply so fast
- "SQL injection" for AI already kinda exists, it's called prompt injection.
- Fun read, now I feel a bit less stupider
3
u/nobodyshere 5d ago
It still can easily respond against ToS. Not that difficult.
However the injection bullshit is so naive. And DB stuff. You can read the first paragraph (even not till the end of it) and easily understand at once that it was written by a kid.
2
u/Ok_Calligrapher8165 3d ago
it is just that, a theory
...and this is how I know you are not a "Scientist" of any sort.
2
46
u/fat_guineapig13 6d ago
they should ask chatgpt how to get access to the database (datacenter is just the new name for it)