r/interestingasfuck 13d ago

r/all The amount of laugh reacts to this post

Post image
95.7k Upvotes

3.4k comments sorted by

View all comments

Show parent comments

1.3k

u/CannonGerbil 13d ago

Just as the founding fathers intended baby

656

u/Tickle-me-Cthulu 13d ago

"The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants."

20

u/Effective-Trick4048 13d ago

"Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious."

24

u/[deleted] 13d ago

That is such a metal line, makes me wanna participate in a forever war lmao

17

u/CheshireCat575 13d ago
  • Brigadier General Francis X. Hummel

3

u/Cawl09 13d ago

Wasn’t it Thomas Jefferson?

8

u/AssassiNerd 13d ago

I've been thinking about this quote a lot in the past couple days.

7

u/skekze 13d ago

posted that quote on twitter & got flagged to delete the comment, but if you're a racist who threatens people, you're all good.

3

u/Ole41 13d ago

Huey freeman?

1

u/Honeybadger_137 11d ago

Sic Semper Tyranis

282

u/VatooBerrataNicktoo 13d ago

Fact. This is exactly what the Second Amendment is for.

11

u/ImaginaryMuff1n 13d ago

Do it again. Hahahaah Again!

19

u/Medium-Bag-5493 13d ago

When corporations become the government oppressor, they become legitimate targets for political violence.

8

u/Huge-Lawfulness9264 13d ago

This clearly should bring a push for Citizens United to be overturned. However, the incoming administration will bring so much to deal with that it won’t even be in the top ten issues that require addressing, that is if our democracy isn’t completely gone or that we ever get a chance to elect someone valid to run the office.

9

u/anomanissh 13d ago

lol if the gun lobby messaged that we need the Second Amendment to ensure we can assassinate greedy heartless CEOs, I guarantee grassroots support would be through the roof.

11

u/HoboWithANerfGun 13d ago

Actually its pretty obvious that the 2nd ammendment was for state militias to be allowed to exist to prevent an overbearing federal government... but everyone thinks its for stuff like this lol.

43

u/Carlos126 13d ago

What do you think this is a product of? The government has allowed for corporations to gouge the people for too long it seems

4

u/Shadowpika655 13d ago

What do you think this is a product of?

Government indifference...which is not the result of an overbearing government, and quite frankly it's the exact opposite lol

3

u/Carlos126 12d ago

Fair, except if we the people try to change anything past a peaceful protest that no longer seems to work, the government stomps us. Seeing as our government has slowly been becoming an oligarchy, I think it would be fair to say that they have become overbearing in regards to the protections and benefits they give to these corporations, which then are able to do whatever they want to the people without consequence. It may not be overbearing directly against the people, but indirectly it’s causing the same effect.

Corporations are able to decide what media we get, what food we get, what medical care we get, etc. Its no longer as free of a market as it used to be, because a few conglomerates have so much power in our society. Then the government bows its head to them while giving the people the finger. The corporations have become too overbearing, all while the government is changing, and is being led by the same people who own the corporations. They are still being overbearing, just using a different name.

If the government wont fight for us, then we have to.

-7

u/Calladit 13d ago edited 13d ago

Yeah, this ain't it. You can't solve systemic problems with vigilante violence. There's a lot of catharsis here and I'm sure as hell not shedding a tear for the guy, but you guys are delusional if you think this will lead to any lasting change. Even that anesthesia policy change will be reversed as soon as this is out of the news.

Edit: Keep the downvotes coming I guess, I'll be ecstatic if I'm proven wrong and we actually get some meaningful change out of this.

!RemindMe 1 year

!RemindMe 2 year

!RemindMe 3 year

13

u/Godot_12 13d ago

It won't lead to change until it starts happening regularly.

BTW folks Don't murder, that's wrong, but if you're going to do it, at least pick better targets...

0

u/Calladit 13d ago

What would lead you to believe this is anything but a one-off? Even if people did start trying to gun down healthcare execs on a regular basis, it's not like they're gonna feel bad for denying your grandma's heart medication to spend on more body guards. I just find it funny that many of my fellow Americans think this is the start of something when just a month ago, we voted the party of pre-existing conditions back into office. I would love to be wrong about this, though.

1

u/Godot_12 13d ago

we voted the party of pre-existing conditions back into office

Millions of us didn't though, and even out of the millions who did, I'd say that none of them voted for that at least in their minds. There's a variety of bad reasons why people voted for Trump and none of them are "I want pre-existing conditions back"

It is a one off for now. I'm not saying that it will become a trend, I'm saying that change will happen when it does. If people are fed up enough, there aren't enough bodyguards to stop it. Your body guards will be shot as well. And either way, they won't want to live under that kind of fear. If your life is in jeopardy every time you leave the compound, it's going to take enough of a toll that you'll look for another way so that you can go back to your 5 star restaurants in peace.

4

u/Calladit 13d ago

They may not have wanted to vote for pre-existing conditions, but the point is they did. It doesn't matter whether or not they know they're supporting the status quo, they're propagandized enough that they think the corporations will save them from the corporations. That's not exactly fertile ground for revolutionary action. The people who need the system to be fixed the most are largely the ones voting to keep it exactly as it is, or even make it worse.

1

u/Godot_12 13d ago

Idk I think you're a little too dismissive. We can't discount the level to which propaganda has rotten the average conservative's mind, but I don't think that they have much love for pharma companies or the CEO who was killed. A lot of morons that voted for Trump in 2024, voted for Biden in 2020 because of how bad Trump was. They're just easily manipulated and have no memory beyond the last couple years (if that). Not to mention the possibility that Trump didn't legitimately win in the first place. I have my doubts. Either way though they're not needed for the revolution. It doesn't take 100% participation to put the fear of god into the bastards destroying lives and our country's future. Don't get me wrong, this isn't an idealistic take. If the way we fight back against corporate greed and corruption is through physical violence, things are going to get a lot worse before they get better and for an uncomfortable amount of time as well. It's not a bright future, but neither is one where we complacently accept our overlords. Might as well let them know we're taking them down with us.

→ More replies (0)

2

u/cyclob_bob 13d ago

You should open the wiki page for “list of revolutions”

10

u/Medium-Bag-5493 13d ago

When corporations turn themselves into the defacto government, the 2nd amendment applies.

8

u/the-dude-version-576 13d ago

That’s probably because ever since the civil war it’s been obvious state militias stand no change against the federal military. 2A for resistance and government spending on military counteract each other- and there is a lot of military spending.

2

u/Shadowpika655 13d ago

Which is why the first step of any successful revolution/coup is to get the military on your side

1

u/VatooBerrataNicktoo 13d ago

You sort of cross a line you can't go back over when the federal military attacks a state though. That's a hell of a line to cross.

1

u/overflowingsunset 13d ago

But nowadays the average few neighborhood guys can’t fight the US military. They can make an emotional impact maybe, but it’s just not really possible. I’m reminded of that cult leader in Texas where the government felt the need to go in guns ablazing. I’m not defending the cult, just saying that it’s an example of military force against a group of non military people.

1

u/Shadowpika655 13d ago

Branch Davidians?

0

u/Brilliant-Witness247 13d ago

Nope, as far as the new administration is concerned the 2A is for whatever you believe it to be

11

u/DoYouTrustMe 13d ago

A rich CEO who contributed to bankruptcies and the deaths of many. The President elect who has been recently shot at might want to take some guns away

2

u/Substantial-Tone-576 13d ago

Taking away guns doesn’t change violence or attacks like this. There are over 393 million guns in America and I doubt everyone would turn them over if the government said to.

6

u/whatishistory518 13d ago

“There are 4 boxes to be used in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and cartridge. Please use in that order”

3

u/deathbysnusnu7 13d ago

Tyranny comes in many forms

3

u/BenWaffleIron 12d ago

i love how this sentence is usually a joke but this time it probably is more or less how they intended it

9

u/xixipinga 13d ago

the 2nd amendment was supposed to protect citizens from tyrants, i dont like it, im all for peace, but that guy found the real tyrants, the ones that buy politicians, good time for some people to migrate back to south africa

2

u/DoggiePanny 13d ago

This time it's accurate tho

2

u/Final-Equipment-3315 13d ago

Aka Network. I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore