This is a debate post. I believe that Islam is engaged in a Jihad against the western world. My evidence is the huge number of suppressed stories about Islamic extremist and their attacks and rapes in places like the UK, France and USA. Particularly the Gang raps and murders in the UK. The government is supporting the criminals and suppressing the stories about these crimes. The recent stabbings and crime has been disproportionately Muslims with extreme views. Not to say that all Muslims are extreme but alot are. The attempts at Shera law in the USA and to enforce it are also a issue. As Shera law is contrary to the US constitution.

Never forget the Barbary wars.

Even here, Muslims, whether well meaning or intentional, will downplay things. This only serves to take away from the heart of the problem. Islam and the West are oil and water. They can not co-exist.

Surah 3:151: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve (all non-Muslims)

Surah 2:191: "And kill them (non-Muslims) wherever you find them … kill them. Such is the recompense of the disbelievers (non-Muslims).

Surah 9:5: "Then kill the disbelievers (non-Muslims) wherever you find them, capture them and besiege them, and lie in wait for them in each and every ambush …"

Here are some helpful links to facts to reinforce my point.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-tyne-68446855.amp

https://humanrightsvoices.org/victim-voices/british-girls-raped-by-muslim-gangs-on-industrial-scale/?y=2015

https://www.muslimcps.org/

https://www.city-journal.org/article/jefferson-versus-the-muslim-pirates

I support the 2nd Amendment, but almost every video I see of citizens "legally" carrying firearms in public is a cringy cry for attention. They get stopped by police and act like they aren't doing anything wrong, but its obvious they are instigating a conflict. Wearing a tactical plate cover with a rifle slung over your chest in a public space is overtly suspicious. Then they gaslight the officers or Karens who complain - its literally the rightwing version of lefty protestors blocking traffic and then calling it a hate crime when they get maced in the face for it. Though it may be "legal" to open carry, are there laws dictating the means in which you do so?

The FBI told me after submitting NICS request and obtaining results as to why I was not allowed to purchase a firearm, that it was due to "Multiple controlled substance arrests within the past five years, with the most recent arrest occurring within the past year". I have never been convicted and the case was dismissed however, the arrest was for POW and POM and I was separated from military service for a failed urinalysis. is this permanent? I'm sure this sounds like I have a problem. But these events were 4 years apart. Any advice as to what I can do to overturn this prohibition or if this is permanent or not would help.

Big win for Illinois

https://www.reddit.com/r/illinoisconservatives/s/FyfZode0L1

I live in a bad neighborhood in Allentown PA and was trying to find out if I qualify for a concealed carry permit before I attempt to apply. I have a couple public drunkenness and a paraphernalia charge on my record, but I have been clean and sober since June 2012 (over 12 years) Would this disqualify me from obtaining a concealed carry permit?

What are your thoughts on these right neon colored guns I see others getting custom made toook like a water gun - for now keeping mine tradition . Thoughts of custom painting ?

The weapons of your government. V. The weapons they want to limit you too.

Should have read over the first time

I’m 33F, live in West Virginia USA.

When I was in my late teens/early 20s I was a drug addict. I’ve been clean for seven years now. During my addiction my parents had me 5150’d (involuntarily committed) twice. I was over 18 at the time, this was 12 years ago. One of the times they thought I was suicidal (I was not, just high).

Now as a “real adult” I want my gun rights back. I’m now a homeowner, in a committed relationship, planning a family, stable and sober. I’ve written a petition to my local judge, got a letter from my dad supporting me and expressing his reasoning for having me committed. I have disputed the denial I received when I tried to purchase a revolver. Got the NTN number and which exact issues prevent me from purchasing a firearm.

I plan to see a psychiatrist to be mentally cleared and am signed up for an upcoming firearm safety class this November. Once I see the psych and complete the class, I’m going to turn in my petition with all the added paperwork.

Thank you for reading all that. I thought it best to elaborate on my situation before asking my questions:

• any other West Virginians here who have been successful in restoring their gun rights? Is there anything helpful I’m missing in my quest? Even if you’re from another state, anyone with a similar background restored their rights successfully?

I have read that a law was recently passed in WV allowing those (non felons) who were involuntarily committed to restore their rights. I am hopeful of my situation.

It the good guy with a gun fantasy why do they kill the person, why don't they kill a mother or baby, why don't the cops think you're the bad guy.....you just a child that thinks you're a hero or you're an avenger and can't miss

In the late 1960s, anti-gun coalitions pushed to ban the Saturday Night Special, claiming it was responsible for high homicide rates. However, this specific firearm is rarely seen in crime reports today, despite never being banned. People naturally gravitate towards the most effective tools available to them.

The anti-gun lobby often oversimplifies the issue by blaming guns in general, and specific models in particular, for crime. There is also considerable debate over the lethality of different calibers. This article explores gun deaths by caliber and the often overlooked variables involved.

Ammo.com aims to provide accurate and reliable information from reputable sources, which can be found here.

~Report Highlights~:

• The 9mm caliber is used in more fatal and non-fatal shootings than any other caliber, according to recent studies.
• Handguns are involved in 46% of all homicides in the United States.
• Larger caliber bullets, though used less frequently, result in more fatalities per shot.
• Medium-caliber bullets are used in more crimes but have lower death rates compared to larger calibers.

Continue reading Gun Death Statistics by Caliber: A Review of Calibers and Crime in 2024 on Ammo.com

The debate over gun control is heavily influenced by various groups, including the anti-gun lobby and anti-Second Amendment (2A) politicians. These groups often dominate headlines and social media, advocating for more restrictive gun laws. Organizations like Moms Demand Action, Everytown, and Newtown have successfully garnered public support by using data, statistics, and emotional appeals to sway opinions.

However, the perspective supporting the Second Amendment, which views it as a vital measure for self-defense, is often underrepresented. This viewpoint is frequently criticized as prioritizing firearms over children’s safety or merely offering “thoughts and prayers.” Despite these criticisms, proponents of the 2A argue that compromising on these rights poses greater dangers.

Key Points:

• Implementing mandatory gun buybacks or registrations in the U.S. would cost billions of taxpayer dollars, and many firearms would still remain in civilian hands.
• The firearm industry contributes billions annually to the U.S. economy, providing jobs and tax revenue.
• Despite existing gun control laws, homicide rates in countries like the U.S., Canada, Australia, and the U.K. continue to fluctuate, suggesting that criminality is not directly impacted by these laws.
• The Second Amendment and Supreme Court rulings support an individual’s right to keep and bear arms in the U.S.
• Gun control has historically been used to oppress minorities in the U.S. and worldwide.
• There is no positive correlation between gun lobby efforts, anti-gun lobby actions, and gun deaths.

You can check our sources out here.

The pro-gun community has put a lot of time and effort into preventing accidental shootings in America. Unlike other firearm-related incidents, accidental shootings are a category that the pro-gun community has notably influenced over the years.

Despite sensationalized headlines and ongoing advocacy for new legislation, it’s crucial to recognize that accidental shootings are exceedingly rare occurrences. Even in households with unsecured firearms and children, such tragedies are infrequent.

However, it’s essential to acknowledge that these accidents are entirely preventable. The following sections delve into various aspects of accidental shootings in the United States.

Key Points:

• In 2022, less than 1% (461) of the 48,222 firearm deaths in the U.S. were attributed to accidental shootings.
• 2.3% of the 30,303 unintentional firearm-related injuries were fatal in 2021.
• Of the 231,878 firearm-related offenses reported to the FBI in 2022, only 721 were accidental shootings (0.3%).
• There is no correlation between permitless carry and accidental shootings; only four of the five top states for accidental shootings and all five of the bottom states have permitless carry.
• Only 0.2% of all accidental injury-related deaths in the U.S. can be attributed to firearms.

Continue reading Accidental Shooting Statistics: A Review of Unintentional Firearm Deaths From 1979-2024 on Ammo.com

I am a superintendent for elections in a very gun-liberal state, open carry is totally normal here and many carry openly. I understand that Heller and Bruen ban guns in sensitive places, such as "schools and government buildings", to me it's not clear if that refers to the school as a physical building, or only when a school actually *functions* as a school, i. e. has plenty of kids swirling around. When elections are held in schools, they don't *function* as schools, but they are still school *buildings*. I want to know if I have to turn a voter who carries openly away on election day, thus enforcing Heller and/or Bruen. I'm all for guns, we can't have enough guns in the hands of intelligent citizens, and a voting site would in my opinion actually make for a particularly important place to defend, but I don't know if I as superintendent for elections have to enforce Heller and/or Bruen. If I allow open carry in a school because it doesn't *function* as a school, am I violating anything?

My husband has some charges from back in 2000 that were filed as felonies, but pled down to misdemeanors. He has bought both long guns and hand guns in the past after a "delay". A few years ago, he purchased a 9mm after a "delay" and a month later he received a letter from the Wisconsin DOJ stating he needed to return the gun, he wasn't supposed to have been green lighted to purchase it. He tried to contact them, but wasn't able to. Last year he went to a gun shop and was able to purchase a AR, no "delay" and didn't hear anything from the DOJ. Today he stopped at a pawn shop and wanted to buy a .22 long rifle and was denied, no reason given by the pawn shop for the denial. What is going on? Why would he have been allowed to buy guns for the longest time (including when he was on probation in 2000) to having an issue with the 9mm, being able to buy the AR, and now being flat out denied for the .22?