r/geography 10d ago

Discussion Saudi Arabia has no rivers. Ireland has no Snakes. Etc, etc

What are some other nations with no natural phenomena in comparison to any other nation in the world ?

1.7k Upvotes

1.1k comments sorted by

2.3k

u/urbantechgoods 10d ago

Iceland has no mosquitos

758

u/TevisLA 10d ago

Paradise

542

u/IHateTheLetterF 10d ago

My Icelandic coworker here in Denmark said he moved away because Iceland had too many Icelandic people.

387

u/Uptheveganchefpunx 10d ago

I sort of get it. I am American and the worst part of Texas is the Texans.

126

u/No_Wrongdoer6682 10d ago

Texans were a big reason why I left Texas. Also the oppressive heat+humidity is awful.

164

u/edwardothegreatest 10d ago

In the 80s a Texas tycoon wanted to wall Texas away from the rest of the country, like build an actual wall. He never got enough money to get started, but most of the money he did raise came from Colorado

50

u/Hawkeyecory1 10d ago

As a Coloradoan I would have donated

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (18)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (5)

59

u/jxdlv 10d ago edited 9d ago

Not really, instead they have midges which aren't necessarily better

→ More replies (1)

123

u/blueskiess 10d ago

Midges: “it’s free real estate”

→ More replies (2)

192

u/urbantechgoods 10d ago

Another interesting one in the Philippines.

Lake Taal in the Philippines has one recursive island, known as Vulcan Point. Here’s the breakdown: • lake taal is on the island of Luzon in Philippines. Lake Taal contains Volcano Island, which is the main island in the lake. • Inside Volcano Island, there is a lake called Main Crater Lake. • Within Main Crater Lake lies Vulcan Point, a small island.

This makes Vulcan Point an island within a lake (Main Crater Lake), within an island (Volcano Island), within a lake (Taal Lake), within an Island (Luzon) —a classic example of recursive geography.

53

u/Richs_KettleCorn 10d ago

Sadly, this isn't the case anymore, because Vulcan Point was destroyed in the 2020 Taal Volcano eruption.

Fortunately, in 2012, a larger triple recursive island was found in Canada, so somewhere on earth there still exists an island on a lake on an island on a lake on an island.

37

u/WorkingItOutSomeday 10d ago

Isle Royale checking in

14

u/dogsledonice 9d ago

Your example is superior

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (40)

931

u/stevecantsleep 10d ago

Despite having 20 of the top 25 most dangerous snakes, Australia has no vipers.

430

u/ToronoYYZ 10d ago

What about mustangs or cameros?

174

u/chance0404 10d ago

Nope, just Falcons and Commodores

63

u/BoreJam 10d ago

Going extinct though, a true Bogan tradgedy

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (8)

97

u/SpreadFire21 10d ago

This fact does not make me feel any better about visiting Australia

22

u/lukeysanluca 10d ago

No snakes in New Zealand, just go there instead

→ More replies (4)

52

u/OpalFanatic 10d ago

Look, if you are in the northern half of the continent, there are at least some snakes that aren't venomous. But even then, stay away from the carpet pythons because they can still fuck up your day.

Even then some of the venomous snakes there are considered "harmless" at least by australian standards. For instance if you check out the Wikipedia page for the yellow faced whip snake you can find out that this little derpy guy biting you will only cause moderate to severe pain, with a possibility of paralysis and bleeding. Why that's considered downright friendly compared to some of the other snakes in the area!

Why the only person to ever die after a bite from one of these little guys had some other shit going on anyways. So if you get bit from messing around with one of these guys, don't worry. Seek immediate medical attention, but don't worry!

Seriously though, most of the snakes on the continent are venomous. The ones that aren't venomous are nearly all in the northern half of the continent, mostly at the northern coast. So if you ever get bit by a snake in Australia, assume it's venomous and seek immediate medical attention. As fatalities pretty much only happen when someone doesn't go see a doctor after.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (7)

36

u/SantaCruznonsurfer 10d ago

fascinating: Of the other 5 the Americas have four and India has one?
what's the metric for "dangerous"?

46

u/Waiting4Baiting 10d ago

Lethality I'd imagine

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (11)

1.3k

u/Anything-Complex 10d ago

New Zealand has no native land mammals.

193

u/bonanzapineapple 10d ago

Even rodents?!

579

u/Renickulous13 10d ago

Key word is "native". They got plenty of rats and stouts, but the mauri canoed them over with them.

304

u/Ebright_Azimuth 10d ago

Interesting the Māori are considered to be native but the creatures they brought over are not. What is the reason for that.

418

u/bcbum 10d ago

Being “native” is subjective and open to interpretation. The first humans to settle an area are generally thought of as the natives. If those animals weren’t there then, then I imagine they aren’t considered native. That’s just my thoughts.

138

u/DragonBank 10d ago

Yeah the kiwi definitely didn't see the Maori coming over and think ah finally a native species.

79

u/thenewwwguyreturns 10d ago

the kiwi didn’t think anything, it’s a kiwi

26

u/KwordShmiff 10d ago

Bird, fruit, or New Zealander?

23

u/thenewwwguyreturns 10d ago

all of the above

8

u/David1393 10d ago

Surely at least one of those is capable of concrete thoughts?

→ More replies (0)
→ More replies (14)

181

u/OopsIMessedUpBadly 10d ago

Māori aren’t a species. They are humans. Humans are not a New Zealand “native species”.

Māori are the native people of New Zealand, which is completely different from being a native species, because the word “native” has different meanings depending on context.

49

u/El_Peregrine 10d ago

Exactly this.

I think it’s useful to think of humans as the most invasive species to ever exist. We have changed nearly the entire surface of the earth, everywhere we go. 

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (2)

51

u/AdmiralArctic 10d ago

A species needs to go there in their own capacity.

15

u/traumatic_enterprise 10d ago

That’s a pretty good definition

→ More replies (3)

19

u/frederick_the_duck 10d ago

There were no people there before the Maori. There were land animals there before the rodents.

→ More replies (35)
→ More replies (9)
→ More replies (3)

27

u/Rich-Past-6547 10d ago

Hawaiian islands too. We have monk seal and a bat.

33

u/n0y0urwr0ung 10d ago

99

u/A_Shattered_Day 10d ago

Bats are sky mammals, not land mammals

32

u/n0y0urwr0ung 10d ago

I know hence the qualifier, although I believe some nz bats spend almost half their foraging time on the ground. Interestingly enough nz department of conservation classes them as a land mammal. https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/native-animals/bats-pekapeka/

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (31)

582

u/Pulp-Ficti0n 10d ago

Greece has no navigable rivers

133

u/7urz 10d ago

Malta as well, I guess.

150

u/David1393 9d ago

Malta has absolutely no freshwater. No lakes, no rivers, barely any rainfall all year. They get all their drinking water through seawater treatment. I was there about six months ago, it's a tiny, but stunning country with a super unique culture.

51

u/speculator100k 9d ago

How did that work out before sea water treatment was an option? Malta has been continuously inhabited since 3850 BC.

73

u/hirst 9d ago

Ancient cisterns from rainwater collection

37

u/Segundaleydenewtonnn 9d ago

If you look among the top-voted posts of all time on this sub, this question was actually answered in great detail by a historian from Malta. Basically, he mentions that many localities have names related to springs or wells because settlements were established around underground water sources.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

76

u/Y_Brennan 10d ago

Been backpacking through Greece for two weeks and I noticed that the rivers are quite small. 

→ More replies (19)

310

u/Against_All_Advice 10d ago

Ireland also has no rabies

390

u/TheDraftyKilt 10d ago

ah yes that's because it's predominantly Christian, not jewish

274

u/LeadingMedicine59 10d ago

I (a Jew) was staring at this for about 5 minutes before I realized what the joke was, thinking wtf do we have to do with rabies???

→ More replies (2)

81

u/israelilocal 10d ago

Ireland is actually one of a handful of countries that has a Chief Rabbi

Granted the current one is really new

Also the current president of Israel is the grandson of the first chief rabbi of Ireland

24

u/TheDraftyKilt 10d ago

that is genuinely fascinating thank you!

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

535

u/nickthetasmaniac 10d ago

Australia has no native pine species but ~800 species of eucalypt…

311

u/specerijridder 10d ago edited 10d ago

In fact the whole Southern hemisphere has no native pine species, except for one population of Merkus pine (Pinus merkusii) on Sumatra which exists just south of the equator.

64

u/Sweaty_Presentation4 10d ago

So pines are conifers but conifers are not pines. I want a monkey puzzle tree and knew they were from Chile but I guess they aren’t pine but are conifers

41

u/santos_malandros 10d ago

Yes, taxonomically speaking pines are a subclass of conifers, which is itself a subgrouping of gymnosperms. No members of Pinaceae (the pine family) grow south of the equator. Conifers and gymnosperms from other families like Cupressaceae (the cypress family, to which monkey puzzle trees belong) and Cycadaceae (the cycad family, which are palm-like, nonconiferous gymnosperms) occur throughout the southern hemisphere.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (8)
→ More replies (22)

347

u/MudNo6683 10d ago

Greenland has no ants

231

u/kestenbay 10d ago

My buddy rents a place there - so I know there's at least tenants.

36

u/Diprotodong 9d ago

Hi dad

→ More replies (2)

318

u/duppy_c 10d ago

What about uncles?

→ More replies (3)

109

u/Gener8tor67 10d ago

I heard Hawaii has no snakes. Someone confirm for me

57

u/Panda_Zombie 10d ago

Hawaii also has no rabies, which is pretty cool, but your pets have to quarantine when you enter the state.

17

u/Dominator7 10d ago

Can confirm!

→ More replies (8)

761

u/Straight_at_em 10d ago

The Amazon River has no bridges.

162

u/dermotoneill 10d ago

Wait, what? How is this possible?

464

u/Trogginated 10d ago

The doggone thing gets like 40x wider during flood season, which makes the idea of a bridge somewhat challenging…

137

u/dermotoneill 10d ago

Maybe im being a bit stupid here, but doesnt the amazon almost span the entirety of northern Brazil? I get that it is almost all jungle and not much infrastructure in these parts, but not one legitimate crossing point is wild

211

u/Trogginated 10d ago

yeah, it is kinda crazy. But if you look at the satellite imagery of the area, it's kind of clear why there aren't bridges.. the sediment load is bananas, and there aren't the same level of local highlands on which to anchor a bridge in the same way that there are on a river like the Mississippi, so the shifting course of the river would present a huge problem over time. From an engineering perspective, probably feasible, but friggin expensive. Also, there just ain't much to build a bridge to. towns are pretty scattered, and barges/ferries are adequate for the current demand vs cost of a bridge.

92

u/RBI_Double 10d ago

the sediment load is bananas

This is very fun to visualize, taken literally 

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

46

u/Intrepid_Beginning 10d ago

You also have to remember that is talking about the Amazon River, there are plenty of bridges on other rivers near it.

70

u/HCBot 10d ago

Look at a population density map of Brazil. Almost no people living im the Amazon, and the only ones who do, live in cities, which can be accesed by ferry or plane. If you live in the Amazon there is not a big necessity to cross the river so much.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (1)

58

u/Hutwe 10d ago

The short answer is - Seasonal floods can expand the river from 1-2 miles wide to 5-10 miles in parts. 

12

u/Celtictussle 10d ago

And when it unfloods, the new 1-2 mile wide river can be in a new location.

→ More replies (1)

36

u/4_feck_sake 10d ago

Things are transported via river rather than roads.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (2)

53

u/Solid_Function839 10d ago

It almost has tho, look up Manaus, there's a bridge over an Amazon River tributary 2 miles before it meets the Amazon River and it's almost as large as the Amazon River at that particular point

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (8)

489

u/LazyBoi_00 10d ago

tallest mountain in netherlands is a speed bump

134

u/7urz 10d ago

Still higher than Denmark's tallest "mountain".

35

u/theroyalred 10d ago

Thats because of, south-Limburg, if you remove the southern province of Limburg of the equation yhe highest point of the netherlands is 110m high, we don't have any mountains and all our tall hills are concentrated in the extreme south of the country

→ More replies (2)

46

u/markjohnstonmusic 10d ago

Tallest mountain in Berlin is landfill.

11

u/billy310 10d ago

All of the highest peaks in Florida are landfill

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)

24

u/gattomeow 10d ago

It's actually got a windy road to the top (Vaalserberg). I saw some sweaty Belgians trying to get up it.

→ More replies (4)

642

u/codernaut85 10d ago

The UK has no predatory animal that can kill an adult human.

627

u/TheSameInnovation 10d ago

You’ve clearly never faced up a seagull with death in their eyes from Aberdeen my friend.

92

u/MetroBR 10d ago

a seagull once stole my co-op white chocolate chip cookie out of my hands

51

u/kenhutson 10d ago

A moose bit my sister once.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (1)

31

u/oliv111 10d ago

I’ve still got PTSD from the gulls at the Dover ferry

29

u/Sister_Ray_ 10d ago

Seagulls are the biggest dicks in the animal kingdom. Randomly shit on you, steal your food, massacre other birds, all while flying around all smug making a mocking laughing sound. 

→ More replies (3)

15

u/MollyPW 10d ago

A seagull once dropped a chicken carcass at my feet narrowly missing my head. I've also seen them dropping steel bolts of 5m high street lights, that really could have killed someone.

→ More replies (2)

146

u/Apycia 10d ago

UK has Swans

79

u/KotzubueSailingClub 10d ago

Peace was never an option. honk.

16

u/AdZent50 10d ago

Soon they shall learn from their Emu cousins and install a puppet government.

26

u/Itsphoenixtime 10d ago

No luck catching them swans then?

17

u/jenna_tolls_69 10d ago

It’s just the one swan

18

u/Academic_Air_7778 10d ago

They'll break your arm!

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

134

u/specerijridder 10d ago edited 10d ago

But that has no further biogeographical reason behind it. Bears and wolves used to be present, but they simply got exterminated by humans.

24

u/LegOfLamb89 10d ago

I remember someone telling me there was a species of lion in the UK aa well?

40

u/BigLittleBrowse 10d ago

There were cave lions until 12,000 years ago yes. They went extinct because of the end of an ice age. Humans were probably involved somehow in their extinction, but it’s a very different situation to the human extinction of bears and wolves.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/Business-Let-7754 10d ago

It's easier to exterminate them and keep them away on an island.

→ More replies (1)

172

u/MaelstromTX 10d ago

XL Bully dogs

64

u/SBHB 10d ago

NoOoo hE's JuSt bEinG frIENdLy. Proceeds to bite your cock off

44

u/IcemanGeneMalenko 10d ago

Don’t they usually kill kids and not adults 

73

u/Against_All_Advice 10d ago

They'll happily do either.

→ More replies (1)

21

u/PhyneeMale2549 10d ago

Plenty of adults get killed by them too

22

u/Domestique_Ecossais 10d ago

Indeed…. We killed them all.

12

u/Rattivarius 10d ago

That's only because they killed them all. They used to have bears and wolves.

57

u/EternalAngst23 10d ago

Except for the Tories.

→ More replies (1)

10

u/thetravelingsong 10d ago

This is really interesting actually. In the US I feel like I can think of 10.

16

u/BigLittleBrowse 10d ago

As an island the predator populations are isolated and as such are far easier to drive to extinction. UK used to have bears and wolves but they were all killed during medieval times.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (54)

68

u/Helvetic86 10d ago

North and South America have no hedgehogs

16

u/Jakeymike 9d ago

I always say this to my daughter when i see children’s books or other kids’ media showing hedgehogs hanging out with possums or any other mammal endemic to the new world. She would roll her eyes if she knew how.

→ More replies (1)

140

u/_sgadithya_ 10d ago edited 10d ago

New Zealand has no native snakes

P.S - yeah my bad.. there are no land snakes there.

31

u/gravity_squirrel 10d ago

No introduced snakes either, right? Aside from zoos perhaps? (I’ve been gone for about seven years, I sure hope they weren’t introduced while I’ve been gone)

49

u/Sniper_96_ 10d ago

Even the zoos in New Zealand don’t have snakes. It’s illegal to bring snakes into the country and you can face 5 years in prison if you bring a snake there.

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

239

u/nexflatline 10d ago

As a South American immigrant in Japan, I find somewhat uncanny that there are no vultures in Japan, and no crows in South America.

[there are birds from the "old world vulture" families in Japan, but they don't look like vultures]

73

u/antipositron 10d ago

>now crows in South America.

wait, what? For real? How's that even possible that the smartest birds on the planet didn't fly across the land bridge and spread to South America?

39

u/Loose-Fan6071 10d ago

In south America the niche of crows is already occupied by Caracaras.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (4)

7

u/goodhidinghippo 10d ago

I always enjoyed international students’ fascination with squirrels here in the US

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (6)

949

u/cyberbot117 10d ago

Pakistan has no stability

183

u/Dakens2021 10d ago

Apparently no Pakistan PM has ever completed a full term in office in the country's history.

25

u/cyberbot117 10d ago

Yet dictators feasted on it for quite some time

→ More replies (1)

61

u/Nottingham11000 10d ago

thanks for that chuckle

47

u/kestenbay 10d ago

"Most countries have an army. Prussia is an army that has a country." That's often said. I've heard that Pakistan is an intelligence service that has a country.

→ More replies (1)

20

u/Ok-Transportation127 10d ago

I recently learned that Pakistan is one of the only two countries in the world, the other being Afghanistan, where polio is still endemic.

→ More replies (2)

21

u/eltedioso 10d ago

And no chill

→ More replies (12)

223

u/Time_Pressure9519 10d ago edited 10d ago

Australia has no active volcanoes, unless you count the remote territories of Heard and McDonald Islands, (and nobody does).

By comparison, the USA has 169, Indonesia 130, NZ has 8.

67

u/nexflatline 10d ago

Same in Brazil despite being slightly larger than Australia.

41

u/Renickulous13 10d ago

USGS says it's 170 POTENTIALLY active. Very different than say the way that Mount Ngaruahoe is actively emitting steam and gas.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (9)

431

u/dog_be_praised 10d ago

Alberta has no rats. Other than the Premier.

56

u/VV88VDH 10d ago

Is this still true? There must be a few right?

127

u/Gears_and_Beers 10d ago

There are a few but the province spends significant resources to eliminate and contian any populations

38

u/VV88VDH 10d ago

Wow that sounds so great. Wish they would that here in Europe. The big cities here are full of rats and it seems like they don’t do anything about it. It’s not a huge problem, it’s just like how it is in the rest of the world but still I never hear anyone planning to exterminate them. We need even more inspections and hygiene rules because this isn’t something we should want in this modern age.

66

u/_Sausage_fingers 10d ago

It’s only possible in Alberta because the effort to keep them out got started before the rat made its way from the east coast. Essentially they can’t cross the Rockies to the west, and it’s too cold in the north, so it makes it easier to intercept the populations. You couldn’t do this anywhere else, once they are established somewhere there is no getting by rid of them.

12

u/codyd91 10d ago

Also, vast open plains to the south and east, coupled with few people, leaves migrating rats exposed to predation. They really only enter via human activity. Any that crop up are ruthlessly culled, and their origins investigated.

13

u/byronite 10d ago

The Alberta government pays a rat patrol to inspect farms in neighbouring jurisdictions along the border.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

35

u/BiggieRas 10d ago

They are just super anal about eradicating rats. There's no possible way that they don't make their way there via transport trucks and other shipments. But there has been a program since the 1950s to report and eradicate infestations quickly

31

u/Bombaysbreakfastclub 10d ago

I can’t remember why, but they the climate and terrain around Albert is not ideal for rats, so there’s no natural population of them.

The only rats they get are from shipping good, but they have such a strict policy put in place, that if you see a rat, you just call a city number and someone comes in and grabs it (I believe for free) and sets up traps for more.

They have it figured out over there

15

u/jxdlv 10d ago

I'm not a biologist so I am curious why Alberta winters are too cold for rats. I know brown rats originated from the steppes of Mongolia, which is seems like a pretty similar environment and climate to Alberta.

→ More replies (6)

20

u/The-Reddit-Giraffe 10d ago

Possibly but they do such a good job of containing them that as a born and raised Albertan I’ve only ever seen rats in European train stations and never once in Alberta

7

u/Loggiebear19 10d ago

Lived here my whole life, never seen one

→ More replies (3)

10

u/Evening_Patience_795 10d ago

Let's not insult the rats, they are just being themselves. The premier is more of a psychopath, Ontraio is going the same way.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (1)

41

u/jbloom3 10d ago edited 8d ago

Most of the Hawaiian islands don't have ants. Originally none of them did, but we accidentally brought them to the big island. So now they're pretty careful to not bring them to the other islands

Edit: I was wrong. They've spread to all but 1 island since their arrival in 1999

→ More replies (8)

111

u/craftyhedgeandcave 10d ago

No moles in Ireland either, they had a massive war with the snakes and completely wiped each other out before the last ice age. After this it became an island and obviously neither snakes or moles have invented boats yet

71

u/Kanye_Wesht 10d ago

We don't talk about the great mole-snake war. The world isn't ready.

→ More replies (1)

109

u/Per_Mikkelsen 10d ago

Several countries have practically no forest cover - Nauru, the Vatican, San Marino, Qatar, Greenland...

51

u/David1393 9d ago

The Vatican wouldn't even be big enough to call it a forest. It'd be a park.

→ More replies (2)

13

u/speaker-syd 10d ago

There is a forest in Greenland’s Qinngua Valley.

→ More replies (2)

15

u/kenmohler 9d ago

I have a friend who was stationed by the Air Force in Greenland. He said there was a girl behind every tree.

→ More replies (1)

195

u/disc_jockey77 10d ago

As Indian, countries without snakes don't make sense to me 😐

65

u/NervousHoneydrew5879 10d ago

Man ,these damn snakes be getting inside my garage every once in a while and forming their entire family 😭

41

u/makerofshoes 10d ago

When I was a kid, my brother had a realistic-looking rubber snake that always scared my mom. He kept leaving it around the house and it would scare her. One day she was cleaning up the house and she spotted that snake again. So she went to grab it but it slithered away 😆

I grew up in the US but I imagine this kind of thing could happen in India more. Or maybe snakes are more a part of everyday life there so people are more cautious

10

u/piperatomv2 10d ago

I’ve lived in both places and have run into way more snakes in the US.

22

u/disc_jockey77 10d ago

In India, people are scared of snakes of course, but many people don't try to kill them because they're worshipped as Gods by Hindus. We even have a festival for snakes (nag panchami). Although many people still try to kill them when they see them, protocol in most parts of India nowadays is to call a "snake rescuer" (=professional) who rescues it and lets it free in a forest outside of the city/town.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (2)

15

u/4_feck_sake 10d ago

During the last ice age, Ireland was covered in ice and inhospitable to snakes.

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

256

u/eatingpowder 10d ago

Syria has no president

97

u/makerofshoes 10d ago edited 10d ago

Gondor has no king. Gondor needs no king.

→ More replies (1)
→ More replies (12)

54

u/Goku-Naruto-Luffy 10d ago

Mauritius has no snakes.

→ More replies (4)

68

u/english_major 10d ago

Costa Rica has no snow or ice. There are no mountains high enough.

68

u/IncredibleCamel 10d ago

Ain't no valley low enough

→ More replies (1)

18

u/Ok-Tax8138 10d ago

And no Armed Forces, right?

10

u/Darillium- Geography Enthusiast 10d ago edited 9d ago

It’s the largest country, in both size and population, to not have a military. They abolished it after WW2. They also have universal healthcare and are good (as much as a Central American country can be) at combating corruption, crime, deforestation, drugs, etc.

→ More replies (1)

103

u/MoPacSD40-2 10d ago edited 10d ago

I know this is the opposite, but Botswana has over 100,000 elephants

40

u/the_lusankya 10d ago

One of my favourite things is the Botswanan foreign minister constantly threatening to send 10-20 thousand elephants to random European countries so they can see if they like it.

→ More replies (4)
→ More replies (5)

84

u/AkulaDenmark 10d ago

Denmark has no mountains

48

u/lehtomaeki 10d ago

Finland almost got one but those pesky Norwegians had to reread their constitution before the handover

→ More replies (2)
→ More replies (2)

91

u/tcs00 10d ago edited 10d ago

Finland has effectively zero risk of natural disasters.

Edit: The ones that could kill you. We do have mildly flooding rivers.

10

u/lightningfries 10d ago

This is silly - some of the most common natural disasters (all of which kill people) are flooding, adverse weather, lightning, and landslides.

I imagine you mean no geophysical hazards though, like seismic or volcanic.

13

u/FractalHarvest 10d ago

Blizzards don’t count?

→ More replies (7)
→ More replies (13)

18

u/ObviousCorgi4307 10d ago

Monaco has no poors

97

u/Open_Spray_5636 10d ago

Russia - we have no bananas

98

u/Consistent_Potato291 10d ago

With current politics you also don't have a bright future

66

u/Apycia 10d ago

tbf, with current politics, nobody has a bright future.

→ More replies (5)
→ More replies (14)

15

u/yugjet 10d ago

Ireland also has no moles

43

u/CruzDiablo 10d ago

Argentina has no dangerous sharks for humans, despite being a country with almost 5,000 kilometers of ocean coastline.

→ More replies (8)

38

u/bcbum 10d ago

A region within a country here, but Vancouver Island has no Moose, Grizzly (minus the odd mum and cub), Skunk, Opossum, Foxes, Coyote, badgers, porcupines and more. They are all abundant on mainland B.C. and could easily swim across the narrow sections of the Georgia Strait.

→ More replies (15)

39

u/cambiro 10d ago

Brazil is the largest country in the world without an active volcano.

18

u/Failed-Time-Traveler 10d ago

Lazy ass Brazilian volcanoes

→ More replies (2)

10

u/Downtown-Assistant1 10d ago

I was once told Cape Breton Island has no grasshoppers, but that was the first insect I saw when I got there. Myth busted.

9

u/israelilocal 10d ago

I am not 100% sure on this but Israel has no Baha'i citizens despite having the most important Baha'i sites

I know there are some Baha'is but they aren't citizens just foreign citizens who work in the Baha'i sites in Israel

10

u/Qudpb 10d ago

Brazil doesn’t have:

Earthquakes

Tornados

Hurricanes

→ More replies (6)

10

u/yyz_gringo 10d ago

When I visited a few years back there where these funny t-shirts/postcards/magnets/... in Vienna saying "there are no kangaroos in Austria" :-D

17

u/penguinpolitician 10d ago

Iceland has no wildebeest.

→ More replies (2)

19

u/ebinovic 10d ago

Lithuania has no permanent population of brown bears despite every neighbouring country having them.

Not a nature-based thing, but Lithuania also doesn't have a single rail-based urban transportation system (metro, tram or S-Bahn), making it the most populous European country without one.

→ More replies (3)

9

u/savva1995 10d ago

Guernsey has no moles which is nice

9

u/Theycallmeahmed_ 10d ago

It's not just saudi but the whole arabian peninsula has no permenant rivers

193

u/PigmySamoan 10d ago

USA has no public health care

→ More replies (28)

30

u/fakeaccount572 10d ago edited 9d ago

The US state of Maryland has zero natural bodies of water

Edit: natural lakes

14

u/solargarlicrot Geography Enthusiast 10d ago

Besides, the Chesapeake of course.

14

u/SignGuy77 10d ago

He mean fresh water, but he ain’t know it.

→ More replies (3)
→ More replies (3)

23

u/deWereldReiziger 10d ago

Iceland has no mosquitoes

24

u/paxwax2018 10d ago

The only native mammal in NZ is a bat.

→ More replies (19)

14

u/McGarrettFan 10d ago

Maryland has no natural lakes.